Hello Guix!
I just pushed a couple of new modules to run system tests. As done in
NixOS¹ (in Perl + Bash), the idea is to run the system under test in a
VM and to instrument the guest system with a backdoor so we can fiddle
with it from the outside.
Here, the backdoor is obviously a Guile REPL,
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Jelle Licht wrote:
> Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
>
> I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
> I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
> (mariadb, blender)
>
> Regards,
> Jelle
>
So, we do need r-lattice when actually using the module..
I attached yet another patch.
>From bc85f769c42418b307339aaafb2f3785a7a897e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:53:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-coda.
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm
Dear Guix,
Yet another patch for an R package.
Kind regards,
Roel Janssen
>From ff2b4d8a0bc1ecf1dcc3a6ce8f3e457910e7aa33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:45:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-mvtnorm.
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm
I improved the patch by removing r-lattice because that is not needed,
and I made a complete sentence in the description.
Here it is:
>From aedf6029283733a19941de2d2b641f87790189d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:39:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH]
Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
(mariadb, blender)
Regards,
Jelle
2016-05-04 12:51 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht :
> Date: Sun, 1
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 00:09:41 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-estimability): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm b/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm
I have taken the liberty to try my hand at finishing this, as I figured
it would be a good way for me to get more familiar with 'the Guix way'
of packaging things.
Wow, did I misjudge this rabbit hole though. It seems to be the case that
rust needs the (most recent) snapshotted binary stage-0
I am presenting GNU Guix in a lightning talk at Dconf
(http://dconf.org/2016/schedule/). The slides are here:
http://biobeat.org/dconf2016.pdf
Still a few hours to go, so you can pitch in :)
Pj.
Alex Kost writes:
> Roel Janssen (2016-05-03 23:17 +0300) wrote:
>
>> I've been submitting most packages this way. Should I align (method
>> ...) to the r in origin for all packages in the future?
>
> Yes, 'method' is a sub-expression or 'origin', not of 'source', and it
> should be aligned
Roel Janssen (2016-05-03 23:17 +0300) wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>
>>> I added your magic for Guile. Here is the patch:
>>>
From 6221baadea331cff7e8ab6b9ea1b3bb7737b227f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Roel Janssen
>>> Date:
Andreas Enge (2016-05-03 22:23 +0300) wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:08:52PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> Only the package name is renamed here. I think it would be more
>> consistent to rename the variable as well.
>
> My apologies, indeed. I will push an additional patch.
I see, thanks!
>
Albin (2016-05-03 22:24 +0300) wrote:
> Den 2016-05-03 kl. 21:09, skrev Alex Kost:
>> Andreas Enge (2016-05-02 13:38 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:22:33PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> + (name "redeclipse")
I would name the package "red-eclipse", but it probably
13 matches
Mail list logo