[PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump

When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted, should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate like this? DylanFrom 05af66570794e80b4e8ce2447152eba251d67759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dylan Jeffers Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016

[PATCH] gnu: Add python-requests-oauthlib

From 5d475aff4eb6e9ec9058b80e5a40bb0cff6f5d9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dylan Jeffers Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:10:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-requests-oauthlib. * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-requests-oauthlib, python2-requests-oauthlib): New

Re: [PATCH 05/26] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add bluez-qt.

David Craven writes: >> I'll use 'BlueZ', the description of bluez uses it. > > Does this mean you are applying the patch or that you want me to resubmit? Oh, sorry for the confusing, I think you will push them yourself. And those KDE patches all look good to me, I haven't

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:21:31 -0700 Dylan Jeffers wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:06:48 -0400 > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > > > From 25cd777ff3a2429cbb257e02603d6bef78d1564f Mon Sep 17

Re: [PATCH 2/2] python-kivy

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 02:06:48 -0400 Mark H Weaver wrote: > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > From 25cd777ff3a2429cbb257e02603d6bef78d1564f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > 2001 From: Dylan Jeffers > > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:15:47

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem.

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:52:39PM +, ng0 wrote: > > Setuptools was not used, so I removed it. > > So python-setuptools is not needed all the when a setup.py is in place? Sometimes it's needed, sometimes not. This time, I tried removing it, and both python-stem and python2-stem still built.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add p7zip.

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> >>> k...@openmailbox.org writes: >>> On 2016-08-09 04:05, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add proxychains-ng.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:50:15PM +, ng0 wrote: >> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (proxychains-ng): New variable. > >> +(arguments >> + `(#:tests? #f >> + #:make-flags (list "CC=gcc") >> + #:phases >> + (modify-phases

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

David Craven writes: >> I just built musl and found that it also installs ?bin/musl-gcc?, a >> wrapper of sorts, but it doesn?t work as it depends on a ?gcc? >> executable to be available. > > With gcc 6 the wrapper isn't necessary anymore. You can disable it > with

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:26:03PM +, ng0 wrote: >> From d6a5487d361eb667448871c42c96d9007a264214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: ng0 >> Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:42:22 + >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem. >>

Re: [PATCH] gnu: cross-libc: Use the correct libc.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 09:56:27PM +0300, Manolis Ragkousis wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I noticed that in commit ef21276053b980 from core-updates-next I am > using (cross-libc-for-target ...) only in one place while I should have > used (let ((libc (cross-libc-for-target target))) (package ...

Re: [PATCH] gnu: cross-libc: Use the correct libc.

Hey Leo, On 08/12/16 21:40, Leo Famulari wrote: > Can you try applying it on top of WIP-core-updates [0]? > > And perhaps reviewing the new branch as requested in [0], while you're > at it? > > [0] > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg00731.html > The patch applied

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Aircrack-ng.

On 2016-08-12 13:01, Leo Famulari wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:58:17AM -0500, ericbav...@openmailbox.org wrote: * gnu/packages/networking.scm (aircrack-ng): New variable. +(inputs + `(("libgcrypt" ,libgcrypt) + ("libnl" ,libnl) + ("ethtool" ,ethtool) + ("pcre"

Re: [PATCH 2/5] gnu: Add libosinfo.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 05:46:00PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> * gnu/packages/qemu.scm (libosinfo): New variable. > >> + ("usb.ids" >> +,(origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + ;; FIXME: there is no versioned URL >> +

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add proxychains-ng.

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:50:15PM +, ng0 wrote: > * gnu/packages/networking.scm (proxychains-ng): New variable. > +(arguments > + `(#:tests? #f > + #:make-flags (list "CC=gcc") > + #:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + ;; Needs to be configured

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add stagit.

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:18:31AM +, ng0 wrote: > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (stagit): New variable. Thank you for this! I added some more licensing information, and cleaned up the synopsis and description a little bit. Pushed as b3885778. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Aircrack-ng.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:58:17AM -0500, ericbav...@openmailbox.org wrote: > * gnu/packages/networking.scm (aircrack-ng): New variable. > +(inputs > + `(("libgcrypt" ,libgcrypt) > + ("libnl" ,libnl) > + ("ethtool" ,ethtool) > + ("pcre" ,pcre) > + ("sqlite"

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem.

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 04:26:03PM +, ng0 wrote: > From d6a5487d361eb667448871c42c96d9007a264214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: ng0 > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:42:22 + > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem. > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-stem): New

[PATCH] gnu: Add proxychains-ng.

>From 895ddace3e0645683adb07a05406419b58e42b01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ng0 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:47:41 + Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add proxychains-ng. * gnu/packages/networking.scm (proxychains-ng): New variable. --- gnu/packages/networking.scm | 31

Re: [PATCH v2] gnu: node: Update to 6.3.1.

On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:13:31PM +0200, Jelle Licht wrote: > Attached you will find the updated version of this patch. Please let me > know what you think. > From 798d0888cc57a18ab31fa546a94932476e39088e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jelle Licht > Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016

Re: JIT compiling

On 12.08.2016 17:08, Sergei Steshenko wrote: >> >> From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso >> To: Alex Vong >> Cc: Ricardo Wurmus ; guix-devel@gnu.org; Leo Famulari >> ;

Re: [PATCH 05/26] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add bluez-qt.

> I'll use 'BlueZ', the description of bluez uses it. Does this mean you are applying the patch or that you want me to resubmit?

Re: Trying to fix IBus

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Chris Marusich writes: >> >>> One last thing: it seems that the NixOS devs' choice of solution was >>> influenced by a desire not to require users to rebuild programs that >>>

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

David Craven (2016-08-11 19:19 +0300) wrote: > How invested are you in this patch? I decided that I wasn't that > invested and it isn't worth the trouble. Some things are not meant to > be. Invested? Sorry, I don't understand. Do you mean how much I need this patch? Well, I don't need it at

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add stagit.

ng0 writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Same as sic, I am not sure if the description could be extended. This is > what I could come up with. > > If you have trouble testing it, consider this commit which is not in 0.4 > release: >

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

> Invested? Sorry, I don't understand. One definition of invest is: devote (one's time, effort, or energy) to a particular undertaking with the expectation of a worthwhile result. I just thought that you had invested some time and energy with this issue, and don't know what your expectation of

Re: [PATCH] (3 patches): move dwm+dmenu to wm, move slock to xdisorg.

This comment updates the state of the patches I now no longer track: Web view of guix-devel at gnu.org server is currently unreachable. With two voices against/concerned about the suckless move, these patches need no longer to be applied. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on

Re: [PATCH] gnu: st: Mov to terminals.scm.

Hi, Mark H Weaver writes: > Mathieu Lirzin writes: > >> iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes: >> >>> ng0 writes: >>> Hi, I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software which just happens to

Re: node FTBFS

Jelle Licht writes: > Hi Alex, > > The patch I supplied at [0] seems to not have these issues: > - It builds (yay) > - That particular test seems run successfully > > Some other tests had to be disabled, but this was mostly due > to constraints of the build environment. >

Re: [PATCH] st: Update to 0.7.

ng0 writes: > ng0 writes: > >> This patch updates st, still in the suckless.scm. >> >> I can adjust whatever patchset gets applied first. > > Correction: I sent this patch before the email on the release got out, > release email says the

Re: [PATCH] gnu: add xlsx2csv.

2016-08-12 14:42 GMT+02:00 Ben Woodcroft : > Hi, > > On 11/08/16 23:02, Catonano wrote: > > > > 2016-08-11 14:11 GMT+02:00 Jan Nieuwenhuizen : > >> Ben Woodcroft writes: >> >> [..] > > >> > However, I note that while the check phase passes, many of the

JIT compiling

On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 23:27 +0800, Alex Vong wrote: > Finally, some unrelated stuff, I hope octave would have a byte code > interpreter soon. I would suggest to write it in rpython, it seems > to be the easiest way to have jit these days. That is a faraway pipe dream. Can you help? - Jordi G. H.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: add xlsx2csv.

Hi, On 11/08/16 23:02, Catonano wrote: 2016-08-11 14:11 GMT+02:00 Jan Nieuwenhuizen >: Ben Woodcroft writes: [..] > However, I note that while the check phase passes, many of the tests > are reported as being failed. Could you look

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

Ricardo Wurmus (2016-08-11 19:42 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> David Craven (2016-08-10 17:13 +0300) wrote: >> Even so, if one insisted on using the recutils output in a programmatic fashion (e.g. in a bash script), it would be best to run “guix build

Re: [PATCH 2/2] python-kivy

Dylan Jeffers writes: > From 25cd777ff3a2429cbb257e02603d6bef78d1564f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dylan Jeffers > Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 17:15:47 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-kivy. > > * gnu/packages/python.scm