Re: [PATCH] NON-WORKING: new package: sent -- simple presentation tool

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 09:35:13 + ng0 wrote: > Alex Vong writes: > > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:44:51AM +0300, kact...@gnu.org wrote: > >>> From: Dmitry Bogatov > >>> > >>> This patch does not work. I did my best during 1.5 hours, but I failed > >>> to ac

Re: QtHaveModule

David Craven writes: > [...] > >> cat >"$out/bin/qt.conf" <> [Paths] >> Prefix = $out >> Plugins = lib/qt5/plugins >> Imports = lib/qt5/imports >> Qml2Imports = lib/qt5/qml >> Documentation = share/doc/qt5 >> EOF > > I am not sure what the best way to proceed is, since $out should be > $GUIX_ENVI

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: atlas: Use cpupower in description.

M=5360, N=5360, lda=5360, NB=24 FINDING NB FOR M=5440, N=5440, LDA=5440: nb=80: 21451.30 --> 21451.30 MFLOP. NB refinement search: *** i=8, nbB=80, NB=80, mul1=8, mul2=0 *** nb=8: 7003.41 --> 7003.41 MFLOP. nb=16: 1278.46 --> 1278.46 MFLOP. nb=24: 1540.0

Re: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: gnome-icon-theme, adwaita-icon-theme: Don't install 'icon-theme.cache'.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:15PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: >> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-icon-theme)[native-inputs]: Remove 'gtk+'. >> [arguments]: Set 'GTK_UPDATE_ICON_CACHE' to the path of 'true'. >> (adwaita-icon-theme)[native-inputs]: Add 'gtk+:bin'. > > Would this patch

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: gtk+: Add "bin" output.

Eric Bavier writes: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:21:53 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:12PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: >> > * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+)[outputs]: New field. >> > --- >> > gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/

[PATCH] gnu: qtbase: Add search path specification for 'QMAKEPATH'.

* gnu/packages/qt.scm (qtbase)[native-search-paths]: New field. [arguments]: Add phase to patch 'qt_config.prf'. --- gnu/packages/qt.scm | 31 ++- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/qt.scm b/gnu/packages/qt.scm index a35c337..a12c

Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.

I hope this will be a topic in Rennes though I won't be there. Savannah is nice but limited in scope (and notably does not provide 100% uptime). The E-mail patch system is archaic and is certainly noisy. I think we should have an additional system that is more friendly. I use github a lot to col

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add bamm.

On 14/08/16 00:46, Alex Kost wrote: [..] Thanks Alex, correct on all counts. I pushed as 'a12ba6e'. ben

Re: Our git just broke

Hi Pjotr, On 14/08/16 03:28, Pjotr Prins wrote: [..] Also gnutls does not pass it's tests on my system, nor does subversion. Both gnutls and subversion are substituted for me on current master (891284), indicating they built without issue OK on hydra. Does it still not work for you? Thanks,

Re: New Polish PO file for 'guix' (version 0.11.0)

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 09:53:24PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:35:50 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:27:04AM +0200, Translation Project Robot wrote: > > > Hello, gentle maintainer. > > > > > > This is a message from the Translation Project robo

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils.

Leo Famulari writes: > Thanks for this patch! How about putting it in disk.scm? I have no > strong preference either way. I don't like moving things around too much > once they have been created, however :) sg3_utils and its library can be used with any SCSI device, which includes many devices w

Re: New Polish PO file for 'guix' (version 0.11.0)

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:35:50 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:27:04AM +0200, Translation Project Robot wrote: > > Hello, gentle maintainer. > > > > This is a message from the Translation Project robot. > > > > A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: gtk+: Add "bin" output.

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 22:21:53 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:12PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > > * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+)[outputs]: New field. > > --- > > gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/package

Re: Our git just broke

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 19:11:35 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:36:06PM +, ng0 wrote: > > On the subject of stagit, this is a software written by the cloud of > > people named "2f30", associated with the ideas of suckless. Should this > > go into suckless.scm and not versi

Re: New Polish PO file for 'guix' (version 0.11.0)

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:27:04AM +0200, Translation Project Robot wrote: > Hello, gentle maintainer. > > This is a message from the Translation Project robot. > > A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted > by the Polish team of translators. The file is available at: > >

Re: [PATCH 1/5] gnu: gtk+: Add "bin" output.

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:12PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+)[outputs]: New field. > --- > gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm b/gnu/packages/gtk.scm > index 21365b9..5c42053 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/gtk.scm

Re: [PATCH 2/5] profiles: gtk-icon-themes: Use 'gtk-update-icon-cache' from 'gtk+:bin'.

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:13PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > * guix/profiles.scm (gtk-icon-themes): Use 'gtk-update-icon-cacnhe' from ^ cache I admit I don't understand this pat

Re: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: gnome-icon-theme, adwaita-icon-theme: Don't install 'icon-theme.cache'.

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 06:46:15PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-icon-theme)[native-inputs]: Remove 'gtk+'. > [arguments]: Set 'GTK_UPDATE_ICON_CACHE' to the path of 'true'. > (adwaita-icon-theme)[native-inputs]: Add 'gtk+:bin'. Would this patch get rid of the icon-theme cach

Re: [PATCH 11/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kpty.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:19:29PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > * gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kpty): New variable. > +(arguments > + `(#:tests? #f ; FIXME: 1/1 tests fail. > + #:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-after 'unpack 'patch-tests > +

Re: [PATCH 10/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kpackage.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > * gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kpackage): New variable. > +(arguments > + `(#:tests? #f ; FIXME: 1/4 tests fail. > + #:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (add-after 'unpack 'patch-test > +

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:52:56AM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote: > Chris Marusich writes: > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils. > > * gnu/local.mk: Include gnu/packages/scsi.scm. > * gnu/packages/scsi.scm: Add new file. > * gnu/packages/scsi.scm (sg3_utils): New variable. Thanks for this patch!

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 02:42:34AM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote: > Hi, > > This patch adds sg3_utils (and libsgutils). > > When I ran 'guix size sg3_utils', I noticed the following output, which > seemed large to me. Is it normal? > > --8<---cut here---start->

Core-updates is ready for your patches!

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:15:58AM +0300, Manolis Ragkousis wrote: > On 08/10/16 22:49, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Since this required me to re-sign these commits, will somebody please > > review the differences between WIP-core-updates and core-updates-next, > > to make sure I've done the right thing

Re: Our git just broke

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:36:06PM +, ng0 wrote: > On the subject of stagit, this is a software written by the cloud of > people named "2f30", associated with the ideas of suckless. Should this > go into suckless.scm and not version-control? The logical place for me > is version-control, the se

Re: Our git just broke

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:33:29PM +, ng0 wrote: > It is reverted and has no immediate priority as I read. > I can do so tomorrow or later today. Sorry that my commit broke it, I > thought the message about twice defined license was just verbose. Now I > know this can break the make. Correct,

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:32:42PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote: > Thanks for getting back. Here is the series! Cool, you showed me something new. I didn't know you could put the whole series in a single attachment, apply it with `git am`, and have the patch ordering handled automatically. Very nice

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 03:00:42PM +0200, David Craven wrote: > Can you please explain why you don't feel competent? It's written in plain > English, not AES encrypted English, so I have difficulty understanding > why people think they can't read it and form an opinion about it (not this > issue in

[PATCH] gnu: Add capnproto.

Hi, This adds the Cap'n Proto serialization system. Note that it bundles googletest; I tried unbundling but it proved difficult. gtest will no longer be used from the 0.6 release so I did not think a comment was necessary. -- Marius >From 456e8242259061693f592d70529ff141b00ea7b1 Mon Sep 17 00:0

[PATCH] gnu: Add dlib.

Hi, This adds the dlib machine learning toolkit. Cheers, Marius >From 9a24f0bfd8a0375928d7accdc0ef744f4fa304a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marius Bakke Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:26:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add dlib. * gnu/packages/machine-learning.scm (dlib): New variable. --- gnu/pa

[PATCH] gnu: Add fio.

Hi Guix, I have been lurking about for a while and will be contributing on a regular basis from here on. Please excuse the backlog ;) Looking forward to your feedback. First out: fio. Cheers, Marius >From 5b8da4acdaed17661f075290db917f2a760db965 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marius Bakke Da

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:28:20 -0700 Dylan Jeffers wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 05:27:59 -0400 > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > >> We generally prefer to use tarball releases, unless there is a > > >> compelling reason to use a non-rel

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 05:27:59 -0400 Mark H Weaver wrote: > Dylan Jeffers writes: > > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > >> We generally prefer to use tarball releases, unless there is a > >> compelling reason to use a non-release commit. > >> > >> Is there a compelling reason? If not, please use the

Re: [PATCH] gnu: spice: Fix usbredir for 32 bit platforms.

Hi David, David Craven writes: > * gnu/packages/spice.scm (usbredir)[origin]: Fetch source from git repo. > [native-inputs]: Add AUTOCONF, AUTOMAKE and LIBTOOL. > [arguments]: Add autogen phase. I see you already pushed this, but there are some problems. See below. > @@ -45,19 +47,39 @@ >

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump

On Sat, 13 Aug 2016 08:57:00 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:31:29PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote: > > When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted, > > should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate > > like this? > > For patches

Re: Our git just broke

Thanks Ben, I thought it was just me banging my head against the wall. Also gnutls does not pass it's tests on my system, nor does subversion. I went back in time to July 22nd. Building fine there. Pj. On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot currently

Re: Our git just broke

Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to >> this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The >> new package builds fine. Can someone take a

Re: Our git just broke

Hi, Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to >> this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The >> new package builds fine. Can someone t

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add bamm.

Ben Woodcroft (2016-08-13 14:19 +0300) wrote: > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bamm): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 94 > + > 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/b

Re: Our git just broke

On 13/08/16 23:07, Leo Famulari wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Hi, I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The new package builds fine. Can someone ta

Re: Our git just broke

> The variable expat is defined twice. Would it be possible to get more meaningful error messages ? -- Vincent Legoll

Re: Our git just broke

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to > this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The > new package builds fine. Can someone take a look please? > > > b3885778

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

> Thanks, but I wouldn't like to participate in such a discussion. Yeah, I get the feeling that no one does. That's why saying something is an FSDG issue is like saying "we won't accept your patch and won't discuss with you why". > I just don't see a problem in accepting this patch as I don't > u

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem.

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 07:02:53AM +, ng0 wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:52:39PM +, ng0 wrote: > >> > Setuptools was not used, so I removed it. > >> > >> So python-setuptools is not needed all the when a setup.py is in place? > > > > Sometimes it's needed,

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:31:29PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote: > When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted, > should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate > like this? For patches that depend on each other, sending them as a "patch series" will commun

Our git just broke

Hi, I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The new package builds fine. Can someone take a look please? b3885778e8e438e8526a8ee9e96072fd00f5cae5 is the first bad commit commit b3885778e8e

Re: octave license is incompatible with openssl

Kei Kebreau writes: > Alex Vong writes: > >> Mike Miller writes: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 14:43:57 +0800, Alex Vong wrote: I thought it was an optional dependency because when I run `./configure --help', it contains the following help: --with-openssl use li

[PATCH 01/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add phonon.

--- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index a679c64..875d94a 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm @@ -77,6

[PATCH 04/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kcrash.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kcrash): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 38 ++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 572edb8

[PATCH 13/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add gpgmepp.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (gpgmepp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index cb942bf..f248343 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/kde-fram

[PATCH 08/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kjobwidgets.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kjobwidgets): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index eeedbdd..428

[PATCH 02/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kauth.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kauth): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 43 + 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 875d9

[PATCH 12/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kunitconversion.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kunitconversion): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 27 +++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 1cc132f..

[PATCH 11/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kpty.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kpty): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 37 + 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 082942c..1

[PATCH 10/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kpackage.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kpackage): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 41 + 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 0e

[PATCH 06/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kfilemetadata.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kfilemetadata): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 31 +++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 85aad67

[PATCH 09/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add knotifications.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (knotifications): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 42 + 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm in

[PATCH 05/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kdoctools.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kdoctools): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 51 + 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 6

[PATCH 07/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kimageformats.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kimageformats): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 37 + 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index 0

[PATCH 03/13] gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kcompletion.

* gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kcompletion): New variable. Co-authored-by: Hartmut Goebel --- gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 42 + 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm b/gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm index

[PATCH 00/13] KDE Frameworks Tier 2 packages and phonon/gpgmepp.

kactivities-stats is also listed as a tier 2 package on the KDE Frameworks website, but since kactivities (a tier 3 package) is a dependency, I'm putting it with the tier 3 packages. David Craven (13): gnu: kde-frameworks: Add phonon. gnu: kde-frameworks: Add kauth. gnu: kde-frameworks: Add

Re: JIT compiling

Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes: > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 23:27 +0800, Alex Vong wrote: >> Finally, some unrelated stuff, I hope octave would have a byte code >> interpreter soon. I would suggest to write it in rpython, it seems >> to be the easiest way to have jit these days. > > That is a faraway

Re: JIT compiling

Sergei Steshenko writes: > - Original Message - >> From: Oliver Heimlich >> To: Sergei Steshenko ; Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso >> ; Alex Vong >> Cc: Ricardo Wurmus ; "guix-devel@gnu.org" >> ; Leo Famulari ; >> "help-oct...@gnu.org" ; Mike Miller >> >> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 7:06 PM

Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.

David Craven writes: >> All: Please share your experiences, positive and negative, with project >> management frameworks. Ideally it covers patches, discussions, >> bugtracking and is accessible and usable at least via web browser. > > I think a few people have said they like github, but it gets

[PATCH] gnu: Add bamm.

* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bamm): New variable. --- gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 94 + 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm index b206f33..7728118 100644 --- a/gnu/packa

[PATCH 0/1] Add BamM.

Hi all, Note that I have some direct involvement in this project so if needed changes could be implemented in the code itself. Thanks in advance. ben

Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.

> The only thing I don't like about github/gogs from an UI perspective is the > merge button. The merge button creates unnecessary merge commits > which I don't like, and many projects agree to not use the merge button. > There is no way to disable it, but I think that disabling it in gogs would be

Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.

> All: Please share your experiences, positive and negative, with project > management frameworks. Ideally it covers patches, discussions, > bugtracking and is accessible and usable at least via web browser. I think a few people have said they like github, but it gets objected to because of certai

Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.

At some point I wanted to reply to the "Subject: none" thread Pjotr opened. It kept growing and growing, and hit the length where I don't feel like I want to add to it. After many years I switched to notmuch for emails, because it all just sucks. And even with notmuch, it just sucks: I apply tags t

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

> But where does the disambiguation choice to expat come from ? I'm no expert, but I think that the difference is only in that the x11 license has an amendment. Except as contained in this notice, the name of the X Consortium shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use

Re: [PATCH] gnu: add xlsx2csv.

On 13/08/16 19:12, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Catonano writes: I would say "Xlsx2csv is a program to convert xlsx format files into plaintext @dfn{comma separated values} (CSV) files. It was designed to be fast and to handle large files." In this way they could search on tne internet the me

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:55 AM, David Craven wrote: > this is what wikipedia has to say about it: Yes, I already knew about the MIT ambiguities, I thought (my bad) that the file param in (x11-style "file://COPYRIGHT") was designed just for that... But where does the disambiguation choice to ex

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

this is what wikipedia has to say about it: Because MIT has used many licenses for software, the Free Software Foundation considers "MIT License" ambiguous. "MIT License" may refer to the "Expat License" (used for Expat) or to the "X11 License" (also called "MIT/X Consortium License"; used for the

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils.

Chris Marusich writes: > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils. > > * gnu/local.mk: Include gnu/packages/education.scm. > * gnu/packages/scsi.scm: Add new file. > * gnu/packages/scsi.scm (sg3_utils): New variable. This commit message contains an error. I copied it from an earlier commit message,

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> David Craven writes: >> I just built musl and found that it also installs ?bin/musl-gcc?, a wrapper of sorts, but it doesn?t work as it depends on a ?gcc? executable to be available. >>> >>> Wi

[PATCH] gnu: Add sg3_utils.

Hi, This patch adds sg3_utils (and libsgutils). When I ran 'guix size sg3_utils', I noticed the following output, which seemed large to me. Is it normal? --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix size sg3_utils store item

Re: [PATCH] NON-WORKING: new package: sent -- simple presentation tool

Alex Vong writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:44:51AM +0300, kact...@gnu.org wrote: >>> From: Dmitry Bogatov >>> >>> This patch does not work. I did my best during 1.5 hours, but I failed >>> to actually build this package. >>> >>> Here is information I can provide:

Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > David Craven writes: > >>> I just built musl and found that it also installs ?bin/musl-gcc?, a >>> wrapper of sorts, but it doesn?t work as it depends on a ?gcc? >>> executable to be available. >> >> With gcc 6 the wrapper isn't necessary anymore. You can disable it >>

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add python-kivy

Dylan Jeffers writes: > Mark H Weaver wrote: >> We generally prefer to use tarball releases, unless there is a >> compelling reason to use a non-release commit. >> >> Is there a compelling reason? If not, please use the 1.9.1 release >> tarball from

Re: [PATCH] gnu: add xlsx2csv.

Catonano writes: > I would say > >> "Xlsx2csv is a program to convert xlsx >> format files into plaintext @dfn{comma separated values} (CSV) >> files.  It was designed to be fast and to handle large files." > > In this way they could search on tne internet the meaning of xlsx and csv and > know >

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add stagit.

Leo Famulari writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:18:31AM +, ng0 wrote: >> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (stagit): New variable. > > Thank you for this! > > I added some more licensing information, and cleaned up the synopsis and > description a little bit.

Re: [PATCH] ui: 'package->recutils' serializes the source field.

David Craven (2016-08-12 13:05 +0300) wrote: >> Invested? Sorry, I don't understand. > > One definition of invest is: > devote (one's time, effort, or energy) to a particular undertaking > with the expectation of a worthwhile result. Ah, OK, then I'm not invested at all :-) > I just thought tha

Re: core-updates merged!

Hello Leo On 08/10/16 22:49, Leo Famulari wrote: > Since this required me to re-sign these commits, will somebody please > review the differences between WIP-core-updates and core-updates-next, > to make sure I've done the right thing? > > When I get the "okay", I will rename the branch to core-u

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ircii.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:38:55PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > I actually applied a tweaked version of this patch with c744f5c0ad. > > But, the improvements you suggest should be applied. > >> > + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys) >> > +

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-stem.

Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:52:39PM +, ng0 wrote: >> > Setuptools was not used, so I removed it. >> >> So python-setuptools is not needed all the when a setup.py is in place? > > Sometimes it's needed, sometimes not. This time, I tried removing it, > and both python-ste