Khal 0.8.3 has been released!
Builds don't seem to be deterministic when I use --check. Not sure where to
start looking in order to fix that.
Troy
From 2538d47347ea2ca04eb116e762e3bf4dec575d31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy Sankey
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:38:20 -0400
Hi,
Alex Vong writes:
> Hi guixes,
>
> This one and the next patch fix '--version' of guix-daemon and
> guix-register. Currently, they are not working, which is the reason why
> help2man gives error when building from source.
>
>
> From
>From a415af4e28055c98737aec967921a04390180c57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:16:52 +
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add emacs-auto-complete.
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-auto-complete): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 29
>From 43c6c8a9983d064e7cfdeed59c3dc923a38007bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:46:57 +
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add emacs-cyberpunk-theme.
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-cyberpunk-theme): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 22
>From c0419eeb59bcad0790741adb995e2b2679b6d11e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:29:19 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: emacs-neotree: Keep downloaded source file format.
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-neotree)[source]: Keep downloaded file
>From c16f7200c00a5203614d6aa6c8b4ddec76545b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:25:53 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add emacs-flx.
* gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-flx): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 27
Hello,
csanchez...@gmail.com (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) skribis:
> In my Guix SD installation, I have the following contents inside
> /var/guix/gcroots:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 ago 24 16:45 booted-system -> /run/booted-system
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 ago 24 16:45 current-system ->
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> ng0 skribis:
>
>> First things first: Corrections will happen, this is not what I ask
>> for. I need help with getting pbpst (which just uses curl for this) to
>> learn about the certificates on the system.
>
> [...]
>
>> +
Lukas Gradl writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> ng0 writes:
>
>> From e399e9a982e8a14e4e7f66d5318d3cf7919a81fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: ng0
>> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:16:27 +
>> Subject: [PATCH]
From: John Darrington
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (rpcbind): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 2d39be1..ff6b220 100644
---
ng0 skribis:
> First things first: Corrections will happen, this is not what I ask
> for. I need help with getting pbpst (which just uses curl for this) to
> learn about the certificates on the system.
[...]
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +
ng0 writes:
> From e399e9a982e8a14e4e7f66d5318d3cf7919a81fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:16:27 +
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: The description should not be used as an introduction to
> generics.
>
> *
> “XXX” is fine here, because it may be impossible for us to fix it.
Ah ok.
> I think this part should indeed be a separate patch. Also, Flex should
> be ‘native-inputs’ presumably, whereas Cracklib should be in ‘inputs’.
Already realized it, and pushed to core-updates as
ng0 skribis:
> From 4ea53551b4b6847f6f7f64e82e0343fe5cc3d89a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: ng0
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 20:16:37 +
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: libmicrohttpd: Update to 0.9.51.
>
> * gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (libmicrohttpd):
David Craven skribis:
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-pam): Update it.
Cool! This would be for core-updates.
[...]
> - `(("flex" ,flex)
> -
> - ;; TODO: optional dependencies
> - ;; ("libxcrypt" ,libxcrypt)
> - ;; ("cracklib" ,cracklib)
> - ))
>
Hi!
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Alex Kost writes:
>
>> Tomáš Čech (2016-08-27 09:57 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:48:36PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
Dear Guix,
Due to an old Automake version (1.13), running the `./configure' phase on
CentOS 7 fails
Hi,
Marius Bakke skribis:
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> gnu/local.mk | 1 +
>> gnu/packages/ola.scm | 9 +++--
>
> Perhaps this could be added to something like automation.scm?
Makes sense to me, unless there are many other OLA-related
Hi,
David Craven skribis:
> The snippet I'm trying to use doesn't work:
>
>#:modules ((gnu packages qt)
> ,@%cmake-build-system-modules)
For reference, this doesn’t work because (gnu packages qt) depends on
all the (guix …) modules. They would need
2016-08-27 22:38 GMT+02:00 Alex Kost :
> Jelle Licht (2016-08-27 14:23 +0300) wrote:
>
> > The Node build system was previously building its own copies of
> > C-ares and http-parser.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/node.scm (node)[inputs]: Add c-ares and http-parser.
> > [arguments]:
Vincent Legoll skribis:
> I'm trying to package & use a static library (not mine), but it looks like
> the right "-L" parameter is not automagically passed to the user package
> (where the lib is in (inputs ...))
>
> something like the following:
>
> (define-public a
Ludo',
On 28/08/16 18:35, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> s/filesystems/file systems/ :-)
Thank you for making my day. I thought the correct spelling was dead.
I dread the first time I catch myself double-spacing sentences, though.
> Did you mean ‘license:gpl2+’ for the second one?
Indeed; already
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (ecryptfs-utils): New variable.
[...]
> +(description
> + "eCryptfs is a POSIX-compliant stacked cryptographic filesystem for
> Linux.
> +Each file's cryptographic meta-data is stored inside the file itself,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
> * gnu/packages/crypto.scm (keyutils): New variable.
[...]
> +(description
> + "Keyutils is a set of utilities for managing the key retention facility
> in
> +the Linux kernel, which can be used by filesystems, block devices, and more
>
Nope, thanks for keeping such a tight eye on security! =) I just
checked the arch linux package and saw that they are using it so I
thought it would probably be a good idea to add...
David Craven skribis:
> I updated the license information for the packages. It's an
> improvement over what was already commited. I called it a isc derived
> license. If someone wants me to take further steps I need clear
> instructions on how to proceed. =)
In cases where a
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> civodul pushed a commit to branch master
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit 3cf319a3f8e23831960a0f1320122cc514188a37
>> Author: Ludovic Courtès
>> Date: Sun Aug 21 19:03:29 2016
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:02:41PM +, David Craven wrote:
> dvc pushed a commit to branch core-updates
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 25d1b3107fc7ebdc155649722fc257f4dbc4b04a
> Author: David Craven
> Date: Sun Aug 28 15:00:49 2016 +0200
>
> gnu: linux-pam: Add
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> $ qemu-arm $(guix build coreutils -s armhf-linux |grep -v debug)/bin/uname -a
> Linux pluto 4.7.0-gnu #1 SMP 1 armv7l GNU/Linux
> $ uname -a
> Linux pluto 4.7.0-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> --8<---cut
David Craven skribis:
>> Also, all the sysadmin work will happen in a bunch of Scheme files,
>> which means that everyone can now contribute to sysadmin, without
>> necessarily having shell access to the machines. No excuses! :-)
>
> Is there a reason why this isn't in
Hello!
David Craven skribis:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 7:38 PM, David Craven wrote:
>> So guix doesn't work inside a vm - because /gnu/store is mounted
>> readonly. To be able to offload arm builds once guix system vm
>> --system=armhf-linux works, /gnu/store
Hi,
David Craven skribis:
> So guix doesn't work inside a vm - because /gnu/store is mounted
> readonly.
Right, and also because ‘guix system vm’ creates a VM that shares its
store with the host system.
> To be able to offload arm builds once guix system vm
>
Tomáš Čech writes:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:34:44PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
>>> >
>>> > > On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM,
Hi Roel,
Roel Janssen skribis:
> From cf5a01aba3c08b7c62048bff3e0f1df80dc0b4dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:48:52 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] guix scripts: Disable grafting on dry runs.
>
> * guix/scripts/archive.scm,
Any idea ? I'm still stuck with this...
--
Vincent Legoll
> Will this result in mass rebuilds? If so this should be pushed to
> core-updates.
I too think that it's below the core updates threshold...
I updated the license information for the packages. It's an
improvement over what was already commited. I called it a isc derived
license. If someone wants me to take further steps I need clear
instructions on how to proceed. =)
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:20:45PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> +(define-public aspell-dict-de
> + (aspell-dictionary "de" "German"
> + #:version "20030222-1"
> + #:sha256
> + (base32
> +
Hullo,
On 28/08/16 14:23, John Darrington wrote:
> Why not generalise that:
> check-alias "test" which defaults to check. Or something similar.
Sure. How about #:test-target? :-)
(Not that calling it test-target instead of check-target isn't
needlessly confusing already. Trips me up every
Thanks for your suggestions. I pushed the packages.
Is there a git repo somewhere I can pull your uboot stuff from? I'd
like to test it =)
I'm interested in starting a riscv port of guixsd at some point. I've
identified some blocking issues I think need to be addressed first to
make it feasible:
Why not generalise that:
check-alias "test" which defaults to check. Or something similar.
J'
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:46:19AM +, ng0 wrote:
Can we ease it up in a different way for applications which do not have
aliases?
Maybe using something like
#:check-is-tests?
Can we ease it up in a different way for applications which do not have
aliases?
Maybe using something like
#:check-is-tests? #t in the arguments, which fails when check and test
exist?
John Darrington writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> "make check" is what
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:39:18PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (prosody): New variable.
>
>> +(inputs
>> + `(("libidn" ,libidn)
>> + ("openssl" ,openssl)
>> + ("lua" ,lua-5.1)
>> + ("lua-expat"
> I didn't look at the list too much, but it looks like it depends on a
> lot of the packages that are also part of this patch set. IMO it should
> be moved to the end of the patch set, but in any case make sure not to
> push this one before all of the packages it depends on are pushed.
There are
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:34:44PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
>
> > On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM, Roel Janssen wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see a
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:19:15PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:19:37PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> +++ b/CODE-OF-CONDUCT
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants
include:
> * Personal attacks
> * Trolling or
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:43:00PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:19:39PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> From: John Darrington
>
> * gnu/packages/onc-rpc.scm (libtirpc)[arguments]: Remove the
--disable-gssapi
> configure flag.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:19:39PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> From: John Darrington
>
> * gnu/packages/onc-rpc.scm (libtirpc)[arguments]: Remove the --disable-gssapi
> configure flag.
> [inputs]: Add mit-krb5
> ---
> gnu/packages/onc-rpc.scm | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 3
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:54:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:48:10PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Leo Famulari skribis:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu:
"make check" is what the Gnu Coding Standards specify:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Standard-Targets
So I think it should stay as it is - at least for the gnu-build-system
J'
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:05:47PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:52:34PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> * gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm (kactivities): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm | 56
> +
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:11:02AM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> >
> > Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
> >
> > > On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't see a way to apply this patch "on the CentOS side" except
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:19:38PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> From: John Darrington
>
> * gnu/packages/aspell.scm (aspell-dict-de): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/aspell.scm | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/aspell.scm
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 08:19:37PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> From: John Darrington
>
> * CODE-OF-CONDUCT: "others" is plural. Hence the apostrophe follows
> the "s".
> ---
> CODE-OF-CONDUCT | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:14:25PM +, ng0 wrote:
>
> 2016-08-26 15:16 recently when I pointed out to someone and they
> added a make check which just calls the original make test, I was
> wondering if our gnu build system should try for make test and make
> check.. this seems to be very
gno writes:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:39:12 +0200
> Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>> * gnu/packages/lua.scm (lua)[arguments]: Use regular build phase and
>> add make-flags.
>> ---
>> gnu/packages/lua.scm | 10 ++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:33:10AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
On 08/27/2016 10:51 AM, Roel Janssen wrote:
I don't see a way to apply this patch "on the CentOS side" except for
waiting (another two or three years) until they upgrade Automake.
When packaging
Arun Isaac writes:
>> thanks for the patch. I’ve made a couple of cosmetic changes and
>> removed the list of supported operating systems from the description. I
>> also moved it from admin.scm to networking.scm where we already have a
>> couple of network
57 matches
Mail list logo