Re: [Whonix-devel] GNU Guix Questions

On 2017-03-10 11:44, ng0 wrote: ban...@openmailbox.org transcribed 5.5K bytes: On 2017-03-07 12:05, ng0 wrote: > On 17-03-07 00:59:08, ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > > On 2017-03-06 17:15, ng0 wrote: > > > Hi bancfc, > > > > > > > Hi ng0, great to see you here :) > > > > > On 17-03-06

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc. (version 2)

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi Kei, > > is anything holding this up? > > I've tested it and can confirm it works fine. Not that I can remember. I believe it was just waiting for review. If this counts as a positive review I can see about tidying it up if necessary and

Re: delete profile

Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a profile for test purposes with > > guix package -p $HOME/guix-test-profile -m test-manifest.scm > > that now I would like to delete. I've looked up the documentation but > not found any suitable command. What's the

Re: [GSoC] Development of Cuirass.

On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 03:49:47PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Hi, > > Here is my proposal for the Google Summer of Code 2017. ... > > 4 Feedback > ══ > > Some people have expressed their interest in having a Web /frontend/ > for Cuirass. To avoid possible confusions I have no

Re: org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser bomb out fix (aka GNOME Settings Schemas)

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:12:44PM +0100, Catonano wrote: >2017-03-13 15:54 GMT+01:00 Pjotr Prins <[1]pjotr.publi...@thebird.nl>: > > I finally found a way of getting around the feared > >   (gnumeric:1974): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema > 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser'

Re: gnu-patches back log

2017-03-07 13:09 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > Catonano writes: > > > Wrapping up, I think 2 interesting ideas popped up in this thread > > > > One is the automation of building of new packages patches > > I wouldn’t know how to set this up. Hydra isn’t

Re: org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser bomb out fix (aka GNOME Settings Schemas)

2017-03-13 15:54 GMT+01:00 Pjotr Prins : > I finally found a way of getting around the feared > > (gnumeric:1974): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema > 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' is not installed > > by setting XDG_DATA_DIRS before running a GTK tool (gnumeric,

Re: org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser bomb out fix (aka GNOME Settings Schemas)

This might also be related to some of the browser crashes people reported when (for example) hitting Ctrl-S. Pj.

Re: org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser bomb out fix (aka GNOME Settings Schemas)

Pjotr Prins transcribed 1.5K bytes: > I finally found a way of getting around the feared > > (gnumeric:1974): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema > 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' is not installed > > by setting XDG_DATA_DIRS before running a GTK tool (gnumeric, gnucash, > some browsers): > >

org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser bomb out fix (aka GNOME Settings Schemas)

I finally found a way of getting around the feared (gnumeric:1974): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser' is not installed by setting XDG_DATA_DIRS before running a GTK tool (gnumeric, gnucash, some browsers): env XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/local/share:/usr/share

Re: [GSoC] Development of Cuirass.

On Sun 12 Mar 2017 15:49, Mathieu Lirzin writes: > Here is my proposal for the Google Summer of Code 2017. Looks great to me. FWIW I think you may want to use Fibers in Cuirass. Sometimes a web API request might need to "fork" off a number of tasks, and Fibers lets you do that

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

On Fri 10 Mar 2017 22:50, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > I had it on my to-do list and Andy said he’d like to have something like > that to publish Guile 2.2 binaries: the ‘guix pack’ command below is a > generalization of the code that builds the Guix binary tarball¹. It > creates a

Re: [GSoC] Development of Cuirass.

Hello Mathieu! Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > The project is the continuation of last year work, and is separated in > two parts. The first part is to improve the testing infrastructure. > The second one is about providing a more complete HTTP API. Sounds cool! > 2.1 The

Re: Using cuirass to build your own manifest.

Hi, > Amazing work! :) Thank you ! >> To finish, the downsides of this setup are : >> * You need to keep your manifest up-to-date on your build machine. > > Do you have ideas/suggestions on how to improve that? Well there is the option to pull a git repository containing the manifest with

Re: [PATCH] gnu: grep: Fix for gnulib library.

On 03/13/17 10:31, Efraim Flashner wrote: > more (if (hurd ...)) patches does also make it easier to merge in > changes for those not using hurd when the time comes, and it allows > those actively using hurd to make changes to more low-level packages > without worrying about how it affects the

Re: [PATCH] gnu: grep: Fix for gnulib library.

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 05:37:13PM +0200, Manolis Ragkousis wrote: > Hello Ludo, > > On 03/11/2017 01:31 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Hi! > > > > ren...@openmailbox.org skribis: > > > >> From f76585a44afdc41187df768eec79fb723713cf0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: rennes

Re: core-updates: Python build failures

Marius Bakke skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:50:32PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >>> I tried applying the upstream fix for 3.5: >>> >>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/337461574c90 >>> >>> However, the monster patch

Re: [PATCH] gnu: grep: Fix for gnulib library.

ren...@openmailbox.org skribis: > Hello Ludovic, Manolis, > >>> Looks like we missed this ‘core-updates’ cycle. :-/ >>> >>> To apply it without triggering a full rebuild, you could instead add a >>> phase that invokes ‘patch’ to apply it, only when the >>> cross-compilation >>> target or system

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Hi Ludo, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Thanks for your feedback! Thank you for taking the time to explain! -- Chris signature.asc Description: PGP signature