Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 16 Mar 2017 20:26, Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>
>>> So! My proposal for this new "guildhall" would be:
>>>
>>> 1. a web service
>>>
>>
>> What would be the cli interface associated with that web service?
>> Some thing like the following will do:
>>
>> $ guildh
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> Hello Guix! Hello 2.2 Guilers!
>
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
>> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to
>> this new command because I think it’s more appropriate: ‘guix archive’
>> is supposed to be rather low-
Pjotr Prins skribis:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:28:05PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> As of right now, ‘guix pack’ can create Docker image (‘guix archive’
>> can no longer do that):
>>
>> guix pack guile-next -S /opt/guile-2.2.0= -f docker
>
> If this works we should advertise it widely.
> I noticed this program and some of the libraries it uses, requires a
> package called "CoverageTestRunner" to run unit tests. Currently tests
> are simply skipped.
>
> It would be nice to have that package in Guix too. Tests helps us
> discover problems early, such as incompatible versions etc.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:21:31PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:36:20AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
>
> ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the
gender and/or
>
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:13:49PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
No.
John, I find you very rude in this thread. Please stop dismissing as
???reproachful, judgemental, censorious, or sanctimonious??? anyone who
dares correct your unsolicited incorrections. Yelling ???
Hi Andy,
It does look a lot like the channels we propose.
Another thing to keep in mind is that it is possible to relocate guix
binaries into any prefix so you do not actually need root privileges.
It is something I am using for testing packages on HPC without root
and I am going to make binari
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:28:05PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> As of right now, ‘guix pack’ can create Docker image (‘guix archive’
> can no longer do that):
>
> guix pack guile-next -S /opt/guile-2.2.0= -f docker
If this works we should advertise it widely.
Pj.
Hello Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> […]
>
>> I understand you feel this way, however to others the effect is
>> important. To trans and non-binary people, being at the receiving end
>> of a stream of misgenderings (intentional or not) is a constant
>> irritation, rem
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:36:20AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
>
> ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender
> and/or
> prefered pronoun of a person :)
>
>
> ... according to some. - but most linguist
No.
John, I find you very rude in this thread. Please stop dismissing as
‘reproachful, judgemental, censorious, or sanctimonious’ anyone who
dares correct your unsolicited incorrections. Yelling ‘DON'T BRING IT
UP’ when they address your behaviour isn't helping your case either.
Everyone's allowi
On Fri 17 Mar 2017 14:54, Christopher Allan Webber
writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Thu 16 Mar 2017 23:01, Mark H Weaver writes:
>>
>>> If [Guix] starts encouraging a decentralized approach, that would
>>> result in strong pressure on us to freeze our API, which includes even
>>> such detai
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Thank you, Andy. I agree with everything you wrote, in particular how
this relates to our goal of creating a welcoming environment, which is a
main task for maintainers.
I am all for creating a welcoming en
Andy Wingo writes:
[…]
> I understand you feel this way, however to others the effect is
> important. To trans and non-binary people, being at the receiving end
> of a stream of misgenderings (intentional or not) is a constant
> irritation, reminding them that they are not welcome in that part
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:30:57 +0100
> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-u...@gnu.org
>
> > Open questions would be, what about other targets like macOS or Windows
> > or whatever? There I don't know. I suspect that if Guix becomes
> > popular enough, someon
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 16 Mar 2017 23:01, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> If [Guix] starts encouraging a decentralized approach, that would
>> result in strong pressure on us to freeze our API, which includes even
>> such details as which module each package is exported from. This
>> would drast
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:43:19PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Hi,
> Please let me know if you don???t want to be bothered about this.
Problem
> is there???s exciting stuff in this patch series and I???d probably have
a
> few questions for you if you want.
Hi,
> Please let me know if you don’t want to be bothered about this. Problem
> is there’s exciting stuff in this patch series and I’d probably have a
> few questions for you if you want.
If we get no sign from David, I'd like to start working on this patch
serie, starting by rebasing it and ap
On Fri 17 Mar 2017 12:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> So! My proposal for this new "guildhall" would be:
>>
>> 1. a web service
>>
>> 2. on which users registers projects
>>
>> 3. a project is a name + a git repository with a /package.scm file
>>
>> 4. the package.sc
John Darrington transcribed 2.2K bytes:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:57:09AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> Hello Andy,
>
> Misgendering a guix contributor is rude.
>
> If deliberate, I agree that misgendering anyone, guix contributor or not,
> would
> be rude. So
Hello!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> Crucially, this "guix pack" is really an SDK for Guile and Fibers.
> Fibers is a library. You can now make an SDK for anything!!! I
> mean, I know, that's a lot of exclamation marks, but check it: you can
> develop locally, say using
>
> /opt/guile-fibers
Hi,
I agree that we need to drop this subject. This will be my last mail in
this thread as well.
On Fri 17 Mar 2017 12:12, John Darrington writes:
> Sometime ago, due to a misunderstanding I received a series of emails
> addressing me as Frau Darrington. I did not feel offended or insulted
>
Hi,
Florian Paul Schmidt skribis:
> On 03/16/2017 11:24 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I think having repos maintained elsewhere is OKish, but it’s true that
>> it requires people who maintain those repos to follow closely what’s
>> going on in Guix proper because we’re not guaranteeing API stabi
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:57:09AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hello John,
Hello Andy,
Misgendering a guix contributor is rude.
If deliberate, I agree that misgendering anyone, guix contributor or not, would
be rude. So I have never done so.
On the grand scale of things it
Hello John,
Misgendering a guix contributor is rude. On the grand scale of things
it is worse than what you perceive to be misuse of language. Continuing
to advocate for your idea on what good English is is unwelcome behavior,
especially when this advocacy ignores the issue of misgendering.
And
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:42:10AM +, ng0 wrote:
Respecting people is more important than correct grammar.
I agree. So please afford me a little respect.
My choice of pronoun for myself is they/them. I'm not picking strawman
arguments here, all I wanted to express i
John Darrington transcribed 2.9K bytes:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:04AM +, ng0 wrote:
> John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
> >
> > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the
> gender
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:08:04AM +, ng0 wrote:
John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
>
> ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the
gender and/or
> prefered pronoun of a person :)
John Darrington transcribed 1.1K bytes:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +, ng0 wrote:
>
> ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender
> and/or
> prefered pronoun of a person :)
>
>
> ... according to some. - but most linguists, and many orators (the
On Fri 17 Mar 2017 10:01, Florian Paul Schmidt writes:
> On 03/16/2017 11:24 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I think having repos maintained elsewhere is OKish, but it’s true that
>> it requires people who maintain those repos to follow closely what’s
>> going on in Guix proper because we’re not gu
On 03/16/2017 11:24 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I think having repos maintained elsewhere is OKish, but it’s true that
it requires people who maintain those repos to follow closely what’s
going on in Guix proper because we’re not guaranteeing API stability.
Wouldn't taking the functional/reprodu
On Thu 16 Mar 2017 23:01, Mark H Weaver writes:
> If [Guix] starts encouraging a decentralized approach, that would
> result in strong pressure on us to freeze our API, which includes even
> such details as which module each package is exported from. This
> would drastically reduce the freedom G
On Thu 16 Mar 2017 20:26, Amirouche Boubekki writes:
>> So! My proposal for this new "guildhall" would be:
>>
>> 1. a web service
>>
>
> What would be the cli interface associated with that web service?
> Some thing like the following will do:
>
> $ guildhall register
So I think we could
ng0 writes:
> Hi,
>
> I will soon start to assemble an GuixSD system image for IN-Berlin
> virtual servers.
> I know bayfront uses a module which defines lsh pubkeys for user 'root'
> (?) and makes them part of the system generation.
>
> For IN-Berlin (and probably other hosters) it would help if
34 matches
Mail list logo
