Re: bug#26109: [PATCH 3/7] gnu: Add dcmtk.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:36:31PM -0400, John Darrington wrote: > [CC guix-devel@gnu.org] > > So we have to make a choice: > > 1. Package a released program with a known vulnerability; or Although all non-trivial software contains bugs, many of which can be exploited, we should not add new

Re: Install hook

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 02:41:09PM +0100, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: No, normally gschemas.compiled is one file storing information about all GSettings application. It must thus be created from files provided by multiple packages. For example, gnome-calculator

Re: bug#26109: [PATCH 3/7] gnu: Add dcmtk.

John Darrington writes: > [CC guix-devel@gnu.org] > > So we have to make a choice: > > 1. Package a released program with a known vulnerability; or > 2. Package an unreleased git snapshot. > > Which is the lesser evil? I choose option two. I'm quite uncomfortable with packaging

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add LDFLAGS=-lpthread to configure-flags where needed.

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:22:11AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > * gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add > LDFLAGS=lpthread. > * gnu/packages/image.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread. I'll wait for somebody else to review the code changes (I don't

For core-updates.

This patch fixes a number of failures in core-updates. I don't know if there is a better way of doing it, or why it is suddenly necessary. gnu: Add LDFLAGS=-lpthread to configure-flags where needed.

[PATCH] gnu: Add LDFLAGS=-lpthread to configure-flags where needed.

* gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread. * gnu/packages/image.scm (arguments)[configure-flags]: Add LDFLAGS=lpthread. --- gnu/packages/fontutils.scm | 1 + gnu/packages/image.scm | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi ng0, > > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:50:26 + > ng0 wrote: > >> What I take from the discussion is, all is good to go except for >> subsystems. I'm okay with reviewing subsystems as an individual patch >> later on.

Re: Being excellent to one another

First of all, I have no clue why my email was explicitly listed in the CC:; I'll assume that was in error. Second, it is not my intention to insult or offend anyone here, but some people seem to be rather thin-skinned about (possibly pretend) slights. However, I feel I should toss my hat into the

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc. (version 2)

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > >> Hi, >> >>>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary") >>>+ "fpc-bin.tar") >>>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")

Re: [GSoC] Development of Cuirass.

Hi, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> 2.1 The testing infrastructure >> ── >> >> Currently Cuirass is providing a small test suite consisting only of >> unit tests. The integration tests are done manually with basic >> examples consisting in building

Re: [GSoC] Development of Cuirass.

"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > On 03/12/2017 07:41 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: >> Hello Florian, >> >> "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: >> >>> On 03/12/2017 03:49 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: Sensitive requests should be done

GuixSD download options

Hello, since the installation process is quite manual, takes long and ends in a VM image for users who don't want to replace their current system, I think there should be at least an option to download a tar file with the content of a preconfigured root file system. Then one could just extract it

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add comments on why setting QT_QPA_PLATFORM for tests.

Hartmut, On 20/03/17 20:57, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > htgoebel pushed a commit to branch master > in repository guix. [...] > ;; make Qt render "offscreen", required for tests A very minor detail, but since it's repeated here so many times: whole-line, ‘;;’-style comments should be full

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc. (version 2)

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi, > >>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary") >>+ "fpc-bin.tar") >>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar") > > Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be

Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:05:04AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > So, here’s a plan: > > • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another > evaluation of the “core” package set for that branch, and check for > anything wrong. From there on, forbid full-rebuild changes.

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:49:13PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote: John, people have explained things at length already; you can re-read the project???s code of conduct if in doubt. This isn???t up for debate. Please stop playing this game right now. Ludo, * I am not

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington skribis: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:09:33AM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > John Darrington writes: > > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote: > > ... and yes. If an individual

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Clément Lassieur writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >>> As of right now, ‘guix pack’ can create Docker image (‘guix archive’ >>> can no longer do that): >>> >>> guix pack guile-next -S

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Excellent article, thanks for writing and sharing! Alex Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi again! > > I’ve written about ‘guix pack’ here: > > https://gnu.org/s/guix/news/creating-bundles-with-guix-pack.html > > Thanks to rekado & jonsger on IRC for the quick review! > > Ludo’.

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:09:33AM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: John Darrington writes: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote: > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by > a partcular set of

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Clément Lassieur writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hello Guix! Hello 2.2 Guilers! >> >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: >> >>> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to >>> this new command because I think it’s more

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 03:27:48PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote: Howdy! John Darrington skribis: > As I recall, their request was that I always use "singular they" and never to > mention other possible alternatives to anyone. I

Re: Being excellent to one another

Howdy! John Darrington skribis: > As I recall, their request was that I always use "singular they" and never to > mention other possible alternatives to anyone. I acknowledge their request > and > recognise their every right to make it. But I feel no

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Hi, Federico Beffa skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hi Federico, >> >> Federico Beffa skribis: >> >>> Say, developer A distributes such an archive A and developer B >>> distributes archive B (a different program/library) and someone C >>>

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! Hello 2.2 Guilers! > > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > >> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to >> this new command because I think it’s more appropriate: ‘guix archive’ >> is supposed to be rather

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Hi again! I’ve written about ‘guix pack’ here: https://gnu.org/s/guix/news/creating-bundles-with-guix-pack.html Thanks to rekado & jonsger on IRC for the quick review! Ludo’.

Re: 01/02: gnu: Add itpp.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:05:11PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: You don't need any additional "plugins" for this, as Emacs couldn't miss it! To check it, run "emacs -Q", paste this: (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:53:38PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote: Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e., guix-technical). Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to

Re: Being excellent to one another

Pjotr Prins transcribed 0.4K bytes: > Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think > we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e., > guix-technical). > > Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to guix-ethical or > guix-culture? We all have good

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:21:59PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: My intention was to call-back to my impression of other parts of this conversation where it seemed you were point-blank refusing to acknowledge ng0's request. As I recall, their request was that I always use

Re: Being excellent to one another

Erm. Despite the obvious intelligence of all Guix participants I think we ought to stick to technical issues on this mailing list (i.e., guix-technical). Maybe we can fork these recent discussions to guix-ethical or guix-culture? We all have good intentions, that is the general assumption! But I

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington writes: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can > still agree on the following statements from my earlier email: > > I agree to a slightly edited version: > >

Re: Being excellent to one another

2017-03-20 11:44 GMT+01:00 John Darrington : > > There is a broad concensus that Donald Trump, Rodrigo Duterte and > Recep Erdogan are awesome.However I do not agree. > It seems to me that, on some issues you perfectly agree with those three.

Re: 01/02: gnu: Add itpp.

John Darrington (2017-03-20 07:38 +0100) wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:18:39AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:03:03AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > > > +(source (origin > > > + (method url-fetch) > > > +

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add niftilib.

Kei Kebreau (2017-03-19 17:03 -0400) wrote: > This is interesting. Which module contains the definition for the > 'every' procedure? (srfi srfi-1) You can read the documentation for 'every' in the Guile manual: (info "(guile) SRFI-1 Searching") -- Alex

Re: Should synopsis handle texinfo markup?

Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-16 23:29 +0100) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2017-03-15 17:14 +0100) wrote: >> >>> Alex Kost skribis: >>> Hello, I've noticed that several packages contain "@code" structures in their synopses, but

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can still agree on the following statements from my earlier email: I agree to a slightly edited version: - [...]

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington writes: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > > > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to > by > > a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may > occasionally > > forget if

Re: Being excellent to one another

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by > a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may occasionally > forget if that person wants feminine pronouns and is

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington writes: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 17:40:27 -0500 > Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > > The important thing is to not assume someone's preferred pronouns > > without

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi Federico, > > Federico Beffa skribis: > >> Say, developer A distributes such an archive A and developer B >> distributes archive B (a different program/library) and someone C >> installs both. > > Interestingly composability (what

Re: 01/02: gnu: Add itpp.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:18:39AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:03:03AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > > +(source (origin > > + (method url-fetch) > > + (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/itpp/itpp/"

Re: 01/02: gnu: Add itpp.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:03:03AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > > +(source (origin > > + (method url-fetch) > > + (uri (string-append "mirror://sourceforge/itpp/itpp/" > > + version "/itpp-" > > +