On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> "Huang, Ying" skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> While I was at it, I wrote a simple test for the dicod service:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 04/02/2017 at 22:13 Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 05:06:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> Based on the GRUB manual [0], how about this plan?
>>
>> We'd add these fields to (grub-configuration):
>
> [...]
>
> NixOS has the user provide a string:
>
>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:37:47PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> It’s time to plan for the next release! Here’s what we maintainers
> think should be done for the next release, which would hopefully happen
> within less than a month:
>
> Please share your thoughts!
I just
On 04/02/2017 at 21:06 Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 12:31:19PM -0400, myglc2 wrote:
>> I gather you are focused on KVM deployment, so this may be off-
>> topic. But FWIW, the patch that I use to run GRUB menus both locally on
>> the console and over IPMI SOL (serial over LAN)
Hello Guix!
With the last blocker out of the way, I’ve merged the branch!
The (not so new) news:
• Updates: glibc 2.25, coreutils 8.26, grep 3.0, guile 2.0.14,
sed 4.4, tzdata 2017a, etc.
• Packages are built with GCC 5 (was 4.9).
• Aarch64 is supported!
• Reproducibility fixes:
Hi ng0,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 07:58:41 +
ng0 wrote:
> Danny, could you list what's left for completion? Is it just circular
> dependencies?
Very little is missing:
- Rustc and cargo should be disentangled. Right now they have to be updated in
lockstep.
- Rust has
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>3. UEFI support documented and possibly improved.
>
> We can certainly document the UEFI setup and add the /boot/efi
> partition in some of the ‘operating-system’ examples.
>
> The more difficult part is the installation: do we need to
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 05:06:20PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Based on the GRUB manual [0], how about this plan?
>
> We'd add these fields to (grub-configuration):
[...]
NixOS has the user provide a string:
https://nixos.org/nixos/manual/options.html#opt-boot.loader.grub.extraConfig
It is
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Since, SDDM can be built without Greenisland (and thus without Wayland
>> support I suppose), what about doing just that?
>
> I suggested this in [0] and see now that I completely missed Leos reply.
>
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Since, SDDM can be built without Greenisland (and thus without Wayland
> support I suppose), what about doing just that?
I suggested this in [0] and see now that I completely missed Leos reply.
Let's do that. No blockers left from my side, at least.
[0]
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> "vim-full" also has a failing test, but is arguably less important.
>> There are "relink" warnings during the test phase, like this:
>>
>> Relink
>>
Hi!
Marius Bakke skribis:
> One "greenisland" test is segfaulting. This package is needed for the
> "sddm" display manager, so I don't think we should merge until that is
> sorted. I'm looking into it now, but struggling to produce useful
> debugging information.
I’ve
Marius Bakke writes:
> One "greenisland" test is segfaulting. This package is needed for the
> "sddm" display manager, so I don't think we should merge until that is
> sorted. I'm looking into it now, but struggling to produce useful
> debugging information.
Apparently
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 12:31:19PM -0400, myglc2 wrote:
> I gather you are focused on KVM deployment, so this may be off-
> topic. But FWIW, the patch that I use to run GRUB menus both locally on
> the console and over IPMI SOL (serial over LAN) on an headless ASRock
> server (MT-c224 w/ ASPEED
Hi Taylan,
taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> If the project takes this ideological side, then it effectively excludes
> some women who find this to be sexist.
The code of conduct is here because “we pledge to respect all people who
contribute”; that’s all it’s
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer writes:
>
>> That's why I was worrying. I think it's fine to ban misgendering, on
>> the condition that, should a female-born person feel insulted at the use
>> of feminine pronouns for a male-born person,
> How many? My impression is that only few of them have. Anyway...
>> Would it be a good idea to add a `check' phase
>> to the emacs build system that looks for these test files, and attempts
>> to run tests?
>
> ... I would say: go for it if you think it's worth. However, I think
> we'll
On 04/01/2017 at 16:29 Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:27:40AM +, ng0 wrote:
>> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.8K bytes:
>> > And you will probably want a non-graphical GRUB menu as well (this
>> > should be parameterized eventually...):
>>
>> Yeah, that would be useful as it
Marius Bakke writes:
> "vim-full" also has a failing test, but is arguably less important.
> There are "relink" warnings during the test phase, like this:
>
> Relink
> `/gnu/store/vis7x2j2lsmwbl5m5w794c23ysqah8xh-libpng-1.6.28/lib/libpng16.so.16'
> with
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like we’re doing okay now? There are still a number of
> armhf-linux builds pending, but if everything goes well, I think we
> should merge tomorrow (Sunday). WDYT?
One "greenisland" test is segfaulting. This package is needed for the
Andy Wingo writes:
> Christopher Webber asks about breakage due to version skew between peer
> channels and channels and Guix itself. I think I would like to just
> ignore this problem for now: if you add channels and things break
> somehow due to an update in Guix or an update in some channel,
Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer writes:
> That's why I was worrying. I think it's fine to ban misgendering, on
> the condition that, should a female-born person feel insulted at the use
> of feminine pronouns for a male-born person, that too should be banned,
> effectively forcing neutral pronouns
ng0 transcribed 4.8K bytes:
> Oh sweet damn My friends and myself so ignorant of this April Fools
> annoyance that I would say: Please double check this message if
> torproject
> does not have the same opinion on aprils fools as I do.
Oh sweet damn My friends and myself so ignorant of this April Fools
annoyance that I would say: Please double check this message if
torproject
does not have the same opinion on aprils fools as I do.
But: the message of tor was merely an opener to my question. I'm still
curious in what needs
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Taylan,
>
> This is guix-devel and this discussion is off-topic.
Just to be clear: should Code of Conduct related discussions happen on
guix-devel or some other place? I assumed guix-devel was the place.
> Furthermore:
>
> taylanbayi...@gmail.com
Hi :)
Thanks all for review; comments and suggestions very welcome. Choosing
this message to reply to.
On Sun 02 Apr 2017 01:05, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo skribis:
>
>> (1) Install Guix as a user. (This needs to be easier.)
>> (2) guix channel
Hi Caleb,
Welcome! :-)
Caleb Ristvedt skribis:
> The description of "replaces the likes of autools, cmake" makes sense, but
> I'm not sure I understand the more advanced features being described -
> specifically "... should ultimately be able to run complex workflows
Chris Marusich skribis:
> The Guix manual has a fantastic section on the "Perfect Setup" for
> hacking on Guix ((guix) The Perfect Setup). This section provides
> excellent guidance for a newbie on how they can set up their development
> environment for hacking on Guix. I
Hi Chris,
Chris Marusich skribis:
> I saw this in guix/scripts.build.scm:
>
> (and (build-derivations store drv mode)
> (for-each show-derivation-outputs drv)
> (for-each (cut register-root store <> <>)
>(map (lambda (drv)
>
Chris Marusich skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Beside, related to Chris’ comment, I’m a bit concerned about versioning
>> in such a widely distributed repo. The package graph in Guix has zero
>> degrees of liberty: every package is connected to other
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 12:30:28AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> It looks like we’re doing okay now? There are still a number of
>> armhf-linux builds pending, but if everything goes well, I think we
>> should merge tomorrow (Sunday).
31 matches
Mail list logo