From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: hardcoded $HOME/.guix-profile in kdevelop
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 21:17:44 +0200
I just stumbled upon commit 2f4d08ee7f897e254c6e533ad2d69c7fe4998f38
while looking for an example of a package that uses QT_PLUGIN_PATH.
I
noticed that the above commit unconditionall
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Adding 'dbus' gives 1988 and 'util-linux' 2171, so it's not a huge
> difference. Is it still worth dropping the 300-500 extra rebuilds?
Well, maybe not after all, it’s hard to tell. I guess we’d need more
sophisticated ways to estimate the cost of updates.
Is anyone lo
Hartmut Goebel skribis:
> Am 04.09.2017 um 17:01 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> That’s roughly what ‘guix pull’ does nowadays, now that it uses
>> Guile-Git.
>
> Does it? I only found the call to `remote-fetch` in guix/git.scm, which
> is not passed any option to.
>
> The trick is to use `--depth=1`
Welcome back! :-)
Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-tox): Update to 2.8.0.
LGTM, thanks!
Ludo'.
Marius Bakke writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> mba...@fastmail.com (Marius Bakke) skribis:
>>
>>> mbakke pushed a commit to branch staging
>>> in repository guix.
>>>
>>> commit 66d4cd7978d41cfde5047f281dc17693bbd4610e
>>> Author: Marius Bakke
>>> Date: Sat Jul 29 18:34:15 2017 +0200
>>>
efr...@flashner.co.il (Efraim Flashner) writes:
> efraim pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 77bb6c227b441277e48d6e2071cca3b801f53374
> Author: Efraim Flashner
> Date: Mon Sep 4 22:35:25 2017 +0300
>
> gnu: gpm: Fix build.
>
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm
kkebr...@posteo.net (Kei Kebreau) writes:
> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> commit d10092b849153dc27cfed0a9601fde6c7bdec918
> Author: Kei Kebreau
> Date: Sun Jul 30 21:02:35 2017 -0400
>
> gnu: Put autoconf-related phases immediately after the 'unpack pha
Hi,
I just stumbled upon commit 2f4d08ee7f897e254c6e533ad2d69c7fe4998f38
while looking for an example of a package that uses QT_PLUGIN_PATH. I
noticed that the above commit unconditionally adds “$HOME/.guix-profile”
to the XDG_DATA_DIRS.
I think we should not hardcode the default user profile di
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> mba...@fastmail.com (Marius Bakke) skribis:
>
>> mbakke pushed a commit to branch staging
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit 66d4cd7978d41cfde5047f281dc17693bbd4610e
>> Author: Marius Bakke
>> Date: Sat Jul 29 18:34:15 2017 +0200
>>
>> gnu: util-linux:
Alex Vong writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:52:49PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
Side note: I think we should start adding patches as origins instead of
copying them wholesale, to try and keep the git repository slim.
>>>
>>> We s
Christopher Allan Webber transcribed 0.3K bytes:
> Thanks for the update! Truly wish I was there.
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > Our next meeting point will be FOSDEM in February I guess.
> >
> > Until then, happy hacking!
>
> Hopefully I can make that, if I can put up patience with the grow
Thanks for the update! Truly wish I was there.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Our next meeting point will be FOSDEM in February I guess.
>
> Until then, happy hacking!
Hopefully I can make that, if I can put up patience with the growing
unpleasantness of international border crossing!
Am 04.09.2017 um 17:01 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> That’s roughly what ‘guix pull’ does nowadays, now that it uses
> Guile-Git.
Does it? I only found the call to `remote-fetch` in guix/git.scm, which
is not passed any option to.
The trick is to use `--depth=1` and fetch the one, expected commit, t
Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> I've kept this tagged to take a look at it later. I checked the sha1sum
> of swig-3.0.10.tar.gz and it gave me a valid URL.
> https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/content/c672b8535394cfb204c70de7c66e69fb20a95647/
> https://archive.softwareheritage.org/
Heya,
Hartmut Goebel skribis:
> I've seen in Ludo's slides that speeding up guix pull is topic. Here is
> a random idea on the:
>
> "git pull" can probably be speed up by using something like
>
> git init .
> git remote add …
> git fetch --depth=1 origin master
> git checkout FET
Dave Love skribis:
> Alex Vong writes:
>
>> Based on the above general argument, I think we should list all the
>> licenses instead of just GPLv2+ since it would be inaccurate to say that
>> the whole program is under just GPLv2+.
>
> Indeed. Not only do you need to list the licences (according
Hi Ben,
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> Anyway, to move forward I created a repo so that package recipes can
> be modified to use a GCC that has been optimised for a particular
> architecture. I put it out there so that it is more than just a patch
> on this ML, but I'd be happy to incorporate it into
Hi,
Dave Love skribis:
> I realize that a lot of packages don't include licence files
> (e.g. glibc).
You mean ‘COPYING’ & co.?
> I'd mistakenly assumed that was automated according to the "license"
> fields.
Nope. Outside of GNU there are no real conventions for license file
names anyway.
Hi,
I've now needed custom modifications in order to enable cross-compilation of a
part of a package in two packages, sunxi-tools and rustc.
Both have this part in a custom phase:
(define (cross? x)
(string-contains x "cross-"))
(setenv "CROSS_C_INCLUDE_
Hello,
Dave Love skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> But that sounds similar to IFUNC in that application code would need to
>> actually use hwcap info to select the right implementation at load time,
>> right?
>
> As far as I know, it's a loader feature. See "Hardware capabilities"
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-tox): Update to 2.8.0.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 346faf434..c7ea1a504 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/pytho
Am 04.09.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Thomas Danckaert:
> Just to make sure, the idea is to:
>
> 1. apply 宋文武's qtbase patch adjusting the paths of various qt components
>
> 2. apply your 2 patches for qtscintilla and qtwebkit
>
> 3. adjust kde.scm so packages in there build correctly?
ACK from my sid
From: Hartmut Goebel
Subject: Re: QT install and search paths
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 18:40:44 +0200
> I'll take care of the packages in kde-frameworks.scm, I assume/hope
> Thomas will take care of the ones in kde.scm.
Hi,
Just to make sure, the idea is to:
1. apply 宋文武's qtbase patch adjusting
23 matches
Mail list logo
