Re: Status of "GuixOps"?

2017-09-20 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Hartmut Goebel writes: > Hi, > > in Ludo's presentation at GHM he presented "GuixOps" on a slide. What is > the status of this approach? I'm very interested in trying it out and > contributing. > > I contributed to DebOps when it was "young". So my point of view is > influenced by how DebOps works

Re: ‘staging’ branch

2017-09-20 Thread Ben Woodcroft
On 21/09/17 11:28, Kei Kebreau wrote: Marius Bakke writes: Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello! Marius, what’s the status of ‘staging’? (Sorry I had to pick someone as the staging master, so to speak. :-)) I've shepherded the last few iterations, so I guess it's only fair! Thank you. If p

Scope of "GuixOps" (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] ganeti-instance-guix)

2017-09-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > [- ganeti] > > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> When you want to try GuixSD, but all you have is a Ganeti cluster... >> >> I'm pleased to announce ganeti-instance-guix[0], a GuixSD provisioner >> for Ganeti. With it you can launch any GuixSD configuration file as >>

Re: ‘staging’ branch

2017-09-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello! > > Marius, what’s the status of ‘staging’? (Sorry I had to pick someone as > the staging master, so to speak. :-)) I've shepherded the last few iterations, so I guess it's only fair! I was waiting for Keis "monster" patch from #27898, but if we are to merge t

Re: [bug#28453] [PATCH 5/5] gnu: openttd-opengfx: Change installation directory.

2017-09-20 Thread Kei Kebreau
Arun Isaac writes: > Please find attached an updated patchset. > > Changes are as follows: > > * Disabled parallel build. > * Included a make-reproducible phase for openttd-opensfx. > * Changed the license for openmsx from cc-sampling+ to gpl2. It was > wrong earlier. > * Changed python dependenc

Re: Testing isolated builds (now w/ attachment)

2017-09-20 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hi, Am 20.09.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Pjotr Prins: > I am facing some issues try to upgrade Elixir. The problem is that the > build fails on tests, but when I build by hand inside > /tmp/guix-build-elixir-1.5.1.drv-0/ the build passes. I've been facing such issue, too. Enclosed please find the scrip

Re: Testing isolated builds

2017-09-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Pjotr Prins writes: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: >> I am facing some issues try to upgrade Elixir. The problem is that the >> build fails on tests, but when I build by hand inside >> /tmp/guix-build-elixir-1.5.1.drv-0/ the build passes. >> >> Is there an easy wa

Re: Testing isolated builds

2017-09-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Pjotr Prins writes: > I am facing some issues try to upgrade Elixir. The problem is that the > build fails on tests, but when I build by hand inside > /tmp/guix-build-elixir-1.5.1.drv-0/ the build passes. > > Is there an easy way to create a similarly restricted environment when > doing a build o

Automatically checking commit messages

2017-09-20 Thread Arun Isaac
I have been working on a guile script to automatically check commit messages -- something like `guix lint' but for commit messages instead of package definitions. This could help us enforce our commit message guidelines and avoid screw-ups like the one I did in commit 1ee879e96705e6381c056358b7f42

Re: Testing isolated builds

2017-09-20 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Hi, Am 20.09.2017 um 14:18 schrieb Pjotr Prins: > I am facing some issues try to upgrade Elixir. The problem is that the > build fails on tests, but when I build by hand inside > /tmp/guix-build-elixir-1.5.1.drv-0/ the build passes. I've been facing such issue, too. Enclosed please find the scrip

Re: My experiences with partitioning according to the manual

2017-09-20 Thread Marius Bakke
Ludovic Courtès writes: >> How big should the boot partition be? Mine seems to have been too >> small, so I got warnings when formatting as FAT32. > > I think the recommendation is to have 50+ MiB for /boot/efi. Marius, > could you confirm? We should definitely write it down. IIRC "doc

Re: Testing isolated builds

2017-09-20 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > I am facing some issues try to upgrade Elixir. The problem is that the > build fails on tests, but when I build by hand inside > /tmp/guix-build-elixir-1.5.1.drv-0/ the build passes. > > Is there an easy way to create a similarly restr

Re: [WIP][PATCH] download: Don't report the progress too fast

2017-09-20 Thread 宋文武
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis: > >> From d0c49ac1341c21d0efb069afb1521f61541e3eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= >> Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 14:10:18 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH] download: Don't report the progr

Testing isolated builds

2017-09-20 Thread Pjotr Prins
I am facing some issues try to upgrade Elixir. The problem is that the build fails on tests, but when I build by hand inside /tmp/guix-build-elixir-1.5.1.drv-0/ the build passes. Is there an easy way to create a similarly restricted environment when doing a build outside Guix? I.e., no $HOME, no /

Re: Adopt a patch!

2017-09-20 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 19.09.2017 um 16:22 schrieb Arun Isaac: > Just thinking out loud: Maybe, we need more people with commit > access. Theoretically, anyone can review a patch, but ultimately it is > people with commit access who will have to finally apply and push the > patch. As the rate of submission of patches