Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

FAIL: abicheck.sh PASS: pltcheck.sh Testsuite summary for gtk+ 2.24.31 # TOTAL: 3 # PASS: 2 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 1 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR:

[PATCH] Add Krita to guix

Second try. I disabled all tests, since these required an X11 display to be present. It's running now. I created a new file and saved the output. Looks good. Please find the patch attached. Lints fine, but I didn't test if this is reproducible, since the build is taking a very long time (even w

Re: Release!

Hi! l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] (Great fix! :) >>> 2. “udevd[304]: RUN{builtin}: 'uaccess' unknown >>> /gnu/store/q7c8yayywf76ai3sgvz16pmbz07gj4bp-udev-rules/lib/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules:15” >> >> I haven't seen this one before. > > I compared the source of eudev and s

Re: [PATCH] Include Krita

Mark Meyer writes: > I retract this patch, it is buggy :( Be right back. > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017, at 00:55, Mark Meyer wrote: >> Hi, >> please find attached a patch to include Krita in Guix. >> >> Please CC me, as I'm not a list member. >> >> Cheers, Mark >> >> -- >> Mark Meyer >> m...@of

Re: [PATCH] Include Krita

I retract this patch, it is buggy :( Be right back. On Tue, Dec 5, 2017, at 00:55, Mark Meyer wrote: > Hi, > please find attached a patch to include Krita in Guix. > > Please CC me, as I'm not a list member. > > Cheers, Mark > > -- > Mark Meyer > m...@ofosos.org > Email had 1 attachment: >

[PATCH] Include Krita

Hi, please find attached a patch to include Krita in Guix. Please CC me, as I'm not a list member. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Meyer m...@ofosos.org From 319fd4fb9d2b11d09a6122476b779f625c5fa8ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Meyer Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 00:52:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] * gnu/

Re: ISO image available for testing!

Hello, Christopher Baines skribis: > I've attempted to use this to install GuixSD on a Bytemark > VM. Unfortunately I haven't succeeded yet. I managed to get as far as > running guix system init, but when I did, it started downloading the > bootstrap binaries, and then building binutils. > > Whe

Re: ISO image available for testing!

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello there! > > I’ve uploaded a GuixSD installation ISO image for testing: > > > http://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/guixsd-install-0.13.0.8d7f1d736.x86_64-linux.iso.xz > SHA256: 7e04017494c419bb6ca654cff05dc7e5ba4fdfd3c2812fba9ba6d929b319e93b > > > http:/

Rust bootstraps via i686?

Does anyone know why rust bootstraps itself from the i686 version of the binaries even if you're running on x86_64? This results in having to download a build a lot of packages to build rust on x86_64. If I can make it bootstrap though the current system in use would that be a useful patch or is

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:44:00PM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote: > Now that this problem around glibc is resolved, I think I will do some > history rewrite, so that these reverts, reverting the revert does not > show up. > I 'm also willing to rename the branch to have wip in the name, as this

Re: A few thing we might consider hosting

On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:21:35AM +0100, Gábor Boskovits wrote: > I was aware of the discussion thread, however I could not find out what the > current state is? Do we plan to modify this behaviour in the next release? I think the current state is "awaiting feedback" :)

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

now I'm trying to build sra-tools. 2017-12-04 17:34 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits : > New branch name is: change-default-icedtea-8-wip > > I left the original intact, but that does not have the needed fixes. > > Guix refresh shows

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

New branch name is: change-default-icedtea-8-wip I left the original intact, but that does not have the needed fixes. Guix refresh shows the following on current core updates: Building the following 39 packages would ensure 202

Re: [bug#29528] Add blacknurse

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.4K bytes: > Hi, > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > > >> + (home-page "https://github.com/jedisct1/blacknurse";) > >> + (synopsis "Proof of Concept for the Blacknurse attack") > >> + (description > >> + "Simple Proof of Concept for the Blacknurse atta

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

Now that this problem around glibc is resolved, I think I will do some history rewrite, so that these reverts, reverting the revert does not show up. I 'm also willing to rename the branch to have wip in the name, as this seems to be standard for longer runnig parts. WDYT? 2017-12-04 15:19 GMT

Re: Problems with setting up prosody with IPv6 and certbot

Hi nee, Thank you for the report! nee writes: > Proper fix: > Build prosody with luasocket 3.0rc1 which introduced ipv6 support and is > recommended on http://prosody.im/doc/ipv6 > Currently we only have luasocket 2.0.2 packaged. I sent a patch that updates lua5.1-socket, see https://debbugs.g

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

Ok, so it seems, that the latest glibc update was made to fix the icu4c thing. It just broke the locales. Fix for that has just been pushed, making core-updates usable again. I pushed to my icedtea branch also. I'm now building it to see what we have now. 2017-12-04 13:59 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

Upstream corrected the issue in commit 6913ad65e00bb32417ad39c41d292b976171e27e. It is not yet included in 2.26. The patch is basically the same as I proposed. I think we should get the upstream version. 2017-12-04 13:33 GMT+01:00 Gábor Boskovits : > I think it should look like this: > > --- c

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

I think it should look like this: --- cdefs.h 2017-12-04 13:27:55.64000 +0100 +++ cdefs.new.h 2017-12-04 13:31:53.82000 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* Copyright (C) 1992-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +y/* Copyright (C) 1992-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of the

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

We also have this in bits/floatn.h, but this seems right. #if (defined __x86_64__ \ ? __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 3) \ : (defined __GNU__ ? __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 5) : __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 4))) # define __HAVE_FLOA

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

We have this in cdefs.h: #if __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 9) \ || __glibc_clang_has_extension (c_generic_selections) \ || (!defined __GNUC__ && defined __STDC_VERSION__ \ && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L) # define __HAVE_GENERIC_SELECTION 1 #else # define __HAVE_GENERIC_SELECTION 0 #endif This

Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

This minimal file reproduces the problem in icu4c 60.1 in guix environment icu4c on current core-updates. #include int main(int argc, char **argv) { std::signbit(1); return 0; } It seems, that it is some problem with cmath.h /gnu/store/2wzijwwgpcdb1msmn3wgq9zmrbrkpx2h-gcc-5.5.0/include/c++

Re: Installing some packages results in "incomplete deployment"

Hi Chris, Chris Marusich skribis: > Some Guix packages exist which are not intended to be installed into a > user's profile. For example, android-udev-rules's description says: > > _Simply installing this package will not have any effect._ It is > meant to be passed to the `udev' servic

Re: fcgiwrap doesn't see gzip

Hi Oleg, Oleg Pykhalov skribis: > strace log from my previous message, apologies. > > I guess, the issue is because fcgiwrap process environment PATH only > contains /gnu/store/…-shadow-4.5/sbin which doesn't include gzip. There are two possible fixes: 1. Set PATH in the execution environmen

ISO image available for testing!

Hello there! I’ve uploaded a GuixSD installation ISO image for testing: http://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/guixsd-install-0.13.0.8d7f1d736.x86_64-linux.iso.xz SHA256: 7e04017494c419bb6ca654cff05dc7e5ba4fdfd3c2812fba9ba6d929b319e93b http://web.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/software/guix/guixsd-

Re: Release!

Hello! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:40:16AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> 1. Do we pre-register berlin’s key on GuixSD? >> >> I vote yes. >> >>> 2. Do we add berlin.guixsd.org to the list of substitute servers on >>> GuixSD? On Gui

Re: Release!

Hello! Leo Famulari skribis: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:40:16AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> 1. Do we pre-register berlin’s key on GuixSD? > > I vote yes. > >> 2. Do we add berlin.guixsd.org to the list of substitute servers on >> GuixSD? On Guix? The drawback is that ‘guix’ som