Re: 02/02: gnu: wine64-staging: Copy missing man file.

Hi, This is your friendly nitpicking bot! ;-) rhell...@mykolab.com (Rutger Helling) skribis: > "/bin/wine-preloader") (string-append > (assoc-ref %outputs "out") > "/bin/wine-

Re: Packing problem for instantmusic

Hi Alex! > Hello, > > Since there is a permission error, I try to chmod some files and it > works. Here is the code: Thanks a lot! It is working now for me as well. I am running Guix as additional package manager on Ubuntu. I had to set the following environment variable to make the video down

Re: change to the wrap-program procedure

Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 02.01.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> I’ll add a special case for this and a test case. > > Great! Thanks. FYI: I sent an initial implementation to guix-patches and got #29951. We can further discuss things there. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6

Re: change to the wrap-program procedure

Am 02.01.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > I’ll add a special case for this and a test case. Great! Thanks. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |

Re: change to the wrap-program procedure (was: core-updates, let’s go!)

Hi Hartmut, > Am 31.12.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> There’s also a change to the wrap-program procedure that does without >> the shell wrappers and instead prepends a short Guile program, which is >> read as a comment in the target language. It’s better to play with this >> in the ne

change to the wrap-program procedure (was: core-updates, let’s go!)

Am 31.12.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > There’s also a change to the wrap-program procedure that does without > the shell wrappers and instead prepends a short Guile program, which is > read as a comment in the target language. It’s better to play with this > in the next core-updates cycl

Re: Help understand some guix concepts

On 01.01.2018 22:04, Martin Castillo wrote: > You can have several > packages. Check the -p flag of `guix package`. s/several packages/several profiles/ -- GPG: 7FDE 7190 2F73 2C50 236E 403D CC13 48F1 E644 08EC

Re: Using ``chmod'' in build phases

Alex Vong transcribed 12K bytes: > Hello, > > Running ``LC_ALL=C grep -r chmod'' on ``guix/gnu/packages'', gives the > following result. As you can see, various modes are used, such as 644, > 755, 555, 666, 777, 664. > Do we have a guide on which mode should be > prefered? As far as I know we do

Using ``chmod'' in build phases

Hello, Running ``LC_ALL=C grep -r chmod'' on ``guix/gnu/packages'', gives the following result. As you can see, various modes are used, such as 644, 755, 555, 666, 777, 664. Do we have a guide on which mode should be prefered? I personally always used 644 for non-executable files, and 755 for dire

Re: Packing problem for instantmusic

Hello, Since there is a permission error, I try to chmod some files and it works. Here is the code: (define-public instantmusic (let ((commit "300891d09c703525215fa5a116b9294af1c923c8") (revision "1")) (package (name "instantmusic") (version (string-append "0.1-" revisi

Re: GNOME on Wayland current status

Hi Ludo, I've sent in a patch (#29943) that adds a small paragraph to the documentation about the current situation. I believe there was a plan to replace SLiM with GDM for the default login manager. Getting GDM to work properly should probably be the first step since it has great Wayland support