Re: Using 'λ'

2018-10-14 Thread Chris Marusich
Alex Vong writes: > [...] It seems many think λ is not newcomer-friendly [...]. I would go one step farther and argue that the name "lambda" itself is not the best, regardless of whether it's written as "lambda" or "λ". I agree with the authors of Structure and Interpretation of Computers when

Re: Making javadoc reproducible

2018-10-14 Thread Gábor Boskovits
Gábor Boskovits ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 14., V, 8:43): > > Chris Marusich ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. > 14., V, 5:35): > > > > Hi Gábor and Vagrant, > > > > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > > > > > There's been some discussion about this in Debian and in reproducible > > > builds: > > > > > >

Re: Using 'λ'

2018-10-14 Thread Alex Vong
Chris Marusich writes: > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 04:51:48PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote: >>> Hello guix, >>> >>> Should we allow the use of 'λ' in guix? I think we have discussed it >>> before, but I forget why it was rejected. Running 'rgrep' on source >>> shows 7 uses

Re: New ‘guix pull’

2018-10-14 Thread Pjotr Prins
Just a quick thank you to all Guix developers. Today I did the bi-annual full update of the Genenetwork graph - the webservice we run - and the process was incredibly smooth. Much better than previous times. I also have the impression that everything runs faster. Nice colors too :). It is star

Re: FOSDEM 2019 - stand

2018-10-14 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le Sun, 14 Oct 2018 15:52:00 +0100, Christopher Baines a écrit : > Björn Höfling writes: > > > First of all, thanks to those who are willing to take a shift. > > Here's the current list: > > > > * Alex Sassmannshausen > > * Tonton > > * Andreas Enge > > * Ludovic > > * Gabor Boskovits > > * Leo

Re: FOSDEM 2019 - stand

2018-10-14 Thread Christopher Baines
Björn Höfling writes: > First of all, thanks to those who are willing to take a shift. Here's > the current list: > > * Alex Sassmannshausen > * Tonton > * Andreas Enge > * Ludovic > * Gabor Boskovits > * Leo Famulari > * Tobias G-R > * me > > Have I missed someone? Do we find more volunteers?

Re: FOSDEM 2019 - stand

2018-10-14 Thread Björn Höfling
There is one more month left until application deadline (November 2), so I want to bring this back to your attention: On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 01:03:25 +0200 Björn Höfling wrote: > Hi Guix, > > FOSDEM also offers stands where you can present your project and get > directly in contact with intereste

Re: Channel dependencies

2018-10-14 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Chris, >> (define (latest-channel-instances store channels) >>"Return a list of channel instances corresponding to the latest checkouts >> of >> -CHANNELS." >> - (map (lambda (channel) >> - (format (current-error-port) >> - (G_ "Updating channel '~a' from Git re

Re: Using 'λ'

2018-10-14 Thread Chris Marusich
Efraim Flashner writes: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 04:51:48PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote: >> Hello guix, >> >> Should we allow the use of 'λ' in guix? I think we have discussed it >> before, but I forget why it was rejected. Running 'rgrep' on source >> shows 7 uses of it. I think it is syntactically

Re: move "source /etc/profile" from .zlogin to .zprofile

2018-10-14 Thread Meiyo Peng
Hi Chris, On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 6:30 AM Chris Marusich wrote: > I haven't tested it, though. Would you like to test it and > let me know if it works for you? Guix is still new to me, and I don't know how to apply the patch and build guix. But I moved "source /etc/profile" from my .zlogin to .

Re: Estimating build time

2018-10-14 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 01:13:17AM +0200, Clément Lassieur wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > In a similar vein, the attached module provides code to estimate package > > build time based on locally-available build logs. It can be used to > > show hints like this: > > [...] > > > The obvio

Re: Using 'λ'

2018-10-14 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 04:51:48PM +0800, Alex Vong wrote: > Hello guix, > > Should we allow the use of 'λ' in guix? I think we have discussed it > before, but I forget why it was rejected. Running 'rgrep' on source > shows 7 uses of it. I think it is syntactically more pleasant and it > encourges