Hello Mark!
Thank you very much for the explanation. Do you know what are the target
packages to be included with our gnome-service? From that target, is all of
them packaged or anything left?
May 2, 2019 9:57 PM, "Mark H Weaver" wrote:
> Hi Raghav,
>
> "Raghav Gururajan" writes:
>
>> Does
Pronaip writes:
> Hi, I'm (still) trying to build Mininet and it uses both a Makefile
> for building an C executable and setup.py to install its Python
> modules. I looked at the soundconverter package to get some hints for
> mixing build systems but couldn't get very far, I get all sorts of
>
Thank you very much Ludo.
May 2, 2019 12:06 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
>
>> Hello, thank for the report, it seems that Let's Encrypt had added the 3
>> missing '^M' to each its pem cert file.
>>
>> I had pushed a fix, please try again, thank y
Hi Raghav,
"Raghav Gururajan" writes:
> Does GNOME meta-package in Guix, corresponds to [1] or [2] or mix of both?
>
> [1] https://packages.debian.org/stable/metapackages/gnome
> [2] https://packages.debian.org/stable/metapackages/gnome-core
Guix doesn't currently have a package that correspond
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0!
>
> This 1.0 release is a major milestone for Guix. It represents 7 years
> of hard work with more than 40,000 commits by 260 people, 19 releases,
> and an equally amazing amount of work on documentation, transl
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:50 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> rohit yadav writes:
>
> >> Do you want to build everything from source on your system or do you
> >> prefer to use binaries from the Guix project’s build farms? Do you have
> >> access to user namespaces / can you use “unshare” for file s
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 4:37 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> > Unfortunately, I am stuck at Centos6 which uses old
> > kernel 2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64. I am able to install nix on this system at
> > non-root location. It works fine but NIx community has decided to use 2.0
> > which only wo
zna...@disroot.org writes:
> Hi! I want be able to see which version number of guix I have, not commit but
> human-readable version, such as 1.0.0. How to do this?
> Once performing `guix pull` I saw it, but now I cannot do it this ways:
>
> # guix describe
> Generation 88 May 02 2019 17:18:30
rohit yadav writes:
>> Do you want to build everything from source on your system or do you
>> prefer to use binaries from the Guix project’s build farms? Do you have
>> access to user namespaces / can you use “unshare” for file system
>> shenanigans?
>>
> I need to build guix for non-root loc
Hi Rohit,
> Unfortunately, I am stuck at Centos6 which uses old
> kernel 2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64. I am able to install nix on this system at
> non-root location. It works fine but NIx community has decided to use 2.0
> which only works on newer kernel. Therefore, I have to now backport several
> p
Hi Laura,
> I like testing (and trying to break) stuff - I
> wished this worked well though :/
I have a new version to test. It's unbreakable though, this one!
I have implemented the repeat procedure and pushed the commit to the
repository.
> I definitely HAVE TO learn Guile.
This is a good
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0!
Massive congrats to the whole Guix community! Woohoo :)
Hi,
> I am trying to prepare guix for installing at non-root location. I have
> followed the documentation available here:
> https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/INSTALL.org#error-in-procedure-scm-error-no-code-for-module-gcrypt-hash
I’d just like to note that this is not official d
Ricardo,
Thanks for pointing that out. I have gone through that. However, none of
those options are applicable here. All of those at some point requires root
permission. The proot is the only option but it is terribly slow and also
several time does not work with dispatching jobs etc (do not have
Hi Ricardo,
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:33 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am trying to prepare guix for installing at non-root location. I have
> > followed the documentation available here:
> >
> https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/INSTALL.org#error-in-procedure-scm-error-
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted
by the Danish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/guix/da.po
(We can arrange things so that in the
rohit yadav writes:
> I am trying to prepare guix for installing at non-root location. I have
> followed the documentation available here:
> https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/INSTALL.org#error-in-procedure-scm-error-no-code-for-module-gcrypt-hash
I forgot to say that we discusse
Hi,
First of all congratulations on releasing 1.0.0. I have been waiting for
this for a long time.
I am trying to prepare guix for installing at non-root location. I have
followed the documentation available here:
https://github.com/pjotrp/guix-notes/blob/master/INSTALL.org#error-in-procedure-scm
Znavko,
zna...@disroot.org wrote:
Hi! I want be able to see which version number of guix I have,
not commit but human-readable version, such as 1.0.0. How to do
this?
Once performing `guix pull` I saw it, but now I cannot do it
this ways:
This won't help you, but I can confirm:
~ λ guix de
Congrats everyone! What an accomplishment!
- Dave
Hi! I want be able to see which version number of guix I have, not commit but
human-readable version, such as 1.0.0. How to do this?
Once performing `guix pull` I saw it, but now I cannot do it this ways:
# guix describe
Generation 88 May 02 2019 17:18:30 (current)
guix 48f19e6
repository URL:
Hi! I want be able to see which version number of guix I have, not commit but
human-readable version, such as 1.0.0. How to do this?
Once performing `guix pull` I saw it, but now I cannot do it this ways:
# guix describe
Generation 88 May 02 2019 17:18:30 (current)
guix 48f19e6
repository URL:
Hi,
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
> Hello, thank for the report, it seems that Let's Encrypt had added the 3
> missing '^M' to each its pem cert file.
>
> I had pushed a fix, please try again, thank you!
Thank you! Note that it doesn’t help much for those whose ‘guix pull’
refuses to ru
Hello, Ludovic! Thank you!
TP's Russian Team coordinator will add me this week after Russian 1 May
holidays, and I will publish my Russian guix-manual translation. Now it's ready
on 14%.
And it is available in gitgud: https://gitgud.io/znavko/guix-manual-ru
There are ready chapters you have denot
Hello, Ludovic! Thank you!
TP's Russian Team coordinator will add me this week after Russian 1 May
holidays, and I will publish my Russian guix-manual translation. Now it's ready
on 14%.
And it is available in gitgud: https://gitgud.io/znavko/guix-manual-ru
There are ready chapters you have denot
Hello everyone,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0!
This is awesome! Thanks to everyone who makes this happen. Let's
celebrate!
--
Meiyo Peng
https://www.pengmeiyu.com/
宋文武 writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0!
>>
>> This 1.0 release is a major milestone for Guix. It represents 7 years
>> of hard work with more than 40,000 commits by 260 people, 19 releases,
>> and an equally amazing amount of work o
Hello!
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
> Congratulations for the great 1.0.0 release, and thank you very much!!
>
> And for all ones that sending/reviewing/applying patches, packaging
> softwares, making system services, writing and translating
> documentations, helping each other, hacking
"Raghav Gururajan" writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I just did "guix pull" but it failed multiple times. Please find the
> following:
>
> root@secondary ~# guix pull
>
> downloading from
> https://ci.guix.info/nar/gzip/zh3s89l1kri7r5ya0bmhil65lm0my691-module-import...
>
> module-import 187B 52KiB/s 00
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0!
>
> This 1.0 release is a major milestone for Guix. It represents 7 years
> of hard work with more than 40,000 commits by 260 people, 19 releases,
> and an equally amazing amount of work on documentation, transl
Hello Guix!
I just did "guix pull" but it failed multiple times. Please find the following:
root@secondary ~# guix pull
downloading from
https://ci.guix.info/nar/gzip/zh3s89l1kri7r5ya0bmhil65lm0my691-module-import...
module-import 187B 52KiB/s 00:00 [##] 100.0%
building /gnu/s
We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0!
This 1.0 release is a major milestone for Guix. It represents 7 years
of hard work with more than 40,000 commits by 260 people, 19 releases,
and an equally amazing amount of work on documentation, translation,
artwork, web design, mentori
32 matches
Mail list logo