Hi Dexter
On 2019-05-05 15:27, Dexter Morgan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was going over list of GNOME Core Applications
> at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Core_Applications. I am not able
> to find half of them in my Guix System as a part of GNOME Desktop.
> Aren't these core applications usually b
Björn Höfling writes:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> do you mean by "Hackathon" a specific day where all
> participants will meet personally/virtual and work together on these
> project ideas? Or do you want to generally encourage people to work on
> these themes?
Either way is fine I think. My hope is th
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> I also tried building “hello”, but I only get the message
>
> madvise failed: Function not implemented
>
> printed endlessly. (This is probably harmless, but nothing else
> happens.)
It’s not endless after all. The VM has 10G of RAM (I don’t know if all
of this i
Björn Höfling writes:
>> 2) Cuirass
>
> On Guix days, we discussed the idea of using Postgresql as a backend.
> Could that also be a task for hacking?
>
> Chris, have you worked on that? I think I saw you adding some
> guile-postgres bindings as a Guix-package.
I've been using PostgreSQL from G
Hi Guix,
I just built Guix in a Debian GNU/Hurd VM and wanted to set it up as a
build node. I applied a patch to use the i586-gnu bootstrap binaries
from my previous attempt in late 2018, which are published at
https://berlin.guixsd.org/guix/bootstrap/i586-gnu/20180908/. These were
built with th
Hi Ricardo,
do you mean by "Hackathon" a specific day where all
participants will meet personally/virtual and work together on these
project ideas? Or do you want to generally encourage people to work on
these themes?
On Fri, 03 May 2019 23:45:00 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> 1) Mumi
With debb
Hi Ricardo,
> Are you saying you want to take snapshots in larger intervals and pad
> the intermediate frames with duplicates of previous frames?
Thank you for writing the snap! procedure. It is writing the output as
intended.
The problem we ran into was to do with the timing. If you go back
Christopher Baines writes:
> I've never worked with this part of Guix before, and some of it is quite
> complex, so I've started by attempting to do the first bit, storing
> warnings as data before outputting them. I've attached a patch.
Now hopefuily with an actually attached patch...
From cd
Hey,
I'm still making progress with the Guix Data Serivce, I recently added
support for recording information about branches from the Commits
mailing list [1]. One reason why this is useful is that it gives some
context to the individual commits.
1: https://prototype-guix-data-service.cbaines.net
In continuation to my previous email in this thread, I would like to
make some changes in what I wrote:
To Ricardo Wurmus, Timothy Sample and Mark H Weaver!
Regarding GNOME Core Applications and modifications to current "gnome"
package, FYI, I have filed this https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.c
To Ricardo Wurmus, Timothy Sample and Mark H Weaver!
Regarding GNOME Core Applications and modifications to current "gnome"
package, FYI, I have filed this https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.c
gi?bug=35586.
Recently, I have been given this link (https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/Ap
ps) which lists
Paul Garlick writes:
> I think we are seeing a difference between wall-clock time and cpu
> time. In the screen file I can see there is a snap! procedure that
> writes a frame to disk after each interval. It looks as if the disk
> i/o is interrupting the sleep counter and introducing a delay
Hi Laura,
> My good news are that I get the 10 secs difference, the bad ones that
> the timing is different:
> 00:01:18.40800
> and
> 00:01:28.40700
> Any clue?
Great. These are the same, my timings expressed in seconds yours in
minutes and seconds.
I think we can live the millisecond d
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 08:46:48PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>
> > Any update on the blog post?
>
> I also intend to look at it and try what Efraim has written, but have
> not yet found the time.
>
I haven't forgotten about it, I was on vacation for a bit and then
Timothy Sample writes:
> I am testing the GNOME 3.30 branch now (on real hardware), and it works
> quite well.
Neat. Thanks for testing it!
For other readers: this is the wip-gnome3.30 branch, which I rebased on
top of “master”.
> The only issue I’m seeing is that the clock is wrong. That
15 matches
Mail list logo
