Hello Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
> We could probably improve the cold-cache timings by adding synopses and
> descriptions to the package cache that ‘guix pull’ builds in
> ~/.config/guix/current/lib/guix/package.cache, but that would also make
> that cache bigger. Not sure if it’s
Hi,
My bad !
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 15:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The warm-cache timings are comparable though, which I think is good.
> :-)
`aptitude search` is not equivalent to `guix package --search` but to
`guix package --list-available`.
The `aptitude` equivalence should be `aptitude s
I've cleaned up the blog post a bit and run it through a spell checker.
I'm unsure about Linux-Libre vs linux-libre, regarding talking about the
kernel and the package. I think I glossed over it well enough that I
didn't actually get a custom kernel up and running on my laptop, but for
the purpose
zimoun writes:
>> For Emacs users, it's what helm-system-packages does. It implements its
>> own names+synopses cache. helm-system-packages takes some seconds on
>> first start to build the cache; after that you get instant live search! :)
>
> You are doing ads for your package ;-)
Helm, what
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 16:08, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> > Another idea would be to have some kind of simple search which only
> > includes the package name and maybe the synopsis.
>
> For Emacs users, it's what helm-system-packages does. It implements its
> own names+synopses cache.
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 15:48, Jonathan Brielmaier
wrote:
>
> On 5/15/19 3:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > We could probably improve the cold-cache timings by adding synopses and
> > descriptions to the package cache that ‘guix pull’ builds in
> > ~/.config/guix/current/lib/guix/package.cache, bu
Hi,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 15:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> For the record, commit 94aeec0aef03ab44e41bfc3e77c3b623cb3d607c, shortly
> before 1.0, make ‘guix search’ faster (as in less CPU usage.)
Six time faster the commit message claims ;-)
Awesome how only 2 lines change things.
> The cold
Hi,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 04:22, Meiyo Peng wrote:
>
> I remember "guix package --search" has always been pretty fast since
> this patch series of Ludovic is merged into guix:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2019-01/msg00254.html.
>
> Before that, "guix package --search" is slo
On 5/15/19 3:34 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We could probably improve the cold-cache timings by adding synopses and
> descriptions to the package cache that ‘guix pull’ builds in
> ~/.config/guix/current/lib/guix/package.cache, but that would also make
> that cache bigger. Not sure if it’s worth
Hey Ludo,
> #1 may have a simple fix. #2 less so. WDYT, Mathieu?
#1 may have a simple fix but it would require to have the output of
"connmanctl services" (as you requested) to better understand why the
name is #f. Plus I cannot find a way to create a network with an empty
SSID.
So we could
Hi zimoun,
zimoun skribis:
> Your machine is probably faster than mine ;-)
For the record, commit 94aeec0aef03ab44e41bfc3e77c3b623cb3d607c, shortly
before 1.0, make ‘guix search’ faster (as in less CPU usage.)
> $ time guix package --search=numpy
> real0m7.353s
> user0m1.256s
> sys
zimoun writes:
> Your machine is probably faster than mine ;-)
I ran this on a Thinkpad T60 with an Intel Core2 CPU (T7600) @ 2.33GHz.
> Yes, once the cache is warm, then it is faster.
> By "All following invocations" you mean a search for a non related
> previous one. Right?
I meant: the ve
Hello Guix!
AFAICS the main installation-related issues have now been fixed. Please
build an ISO image of the installer and give it a try in a VM or on the
bare metal!
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Building-the-Installation-Image.html
To try install from the ISO image
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Giovanni Biscuolo skribis:
[...]
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35655
>> (Installer: mount error using btrfs on already formatted partition)
>
> Looks like this one should be fixed! If you want, you’re welcome to
> build the image and g
Dear,
On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 04:22, Meiyo Peng wrote:
>
> zimoun writes:
>
> > When searching packages with `guix search`, it appears to me slow;
> > especially compared to `aptitude` of Debian.
> > ...
> > What should be done to improve the search speed?
>
> I remember "guix package --search" ha
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 22:17, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> For me this command
>
> time guix package --search=python-numpy
>
> when run for the first time takes
>
> real 0m4.729s
> user 0m1.332s
> sys 0m0.815s
>
> All following invocations finish in about a second:
>
> real 0m1.469s
>
On IRC at May. 14. 2019, the topic of content addressable store idea was
discussed.
This is also discussed here:
page 143 of https://nixos.org/~eelco/pubs/phd-thesis.pdf (or 135) on the
intentional model
and
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/296.
Thanks for the links roptat.
So, after reading
17 matches
Mail list logo
