Re: I didn't break guix in the way I thought

zerodaysford...@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) writes: > Sadly, it seems that 'gnu/machine/ssh.scm' still isn't being installed. > Would anyone with autotools experience be willing to take a look? This should be fixed in commit 079c93e1c1dd93639417095000d5e56d8db62d61. Mark

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Ricardo, can you see if 834b8a4110 fixes the problem? > > It does not seem to fix this problem. > “gnu/machine/ssh.scm” still isn’t included. The problem is that (guix self) has its own logic, independent of the *.am f

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Ricardo, can you see if 834b8a4110 fixes the problem? > > It does not seem to fix this problem. > “gnu/machine/ssh.scm” still isn’t included. Unfortunately my ability to debug autotools problems is... almost nonexistant. Any autoto

Re: BTRFS, LVM, LUKS

On Jul 5, 2019, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Regardless, I’m all in favor of reviving this patch set, it should be > easier this time around! Thanks. Should I contact the original author for copyright purposes, or may I assume it was contributed, even if not yet integrated, and take it from there?

Re: BTRFS, LVM, LUKS

On Jul 5, 2019, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > With BTRFS multi device activation is built in the Linux kernel AFAIU, I'm pretty sure btrfs dev scan or similar must introduce each of the filesystem components to the kernel before the kernel will use them. > I cannot help much with mdraid since I s

Re: I didn't break guix in the way I thought

Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Okay, the main things that are broken are my laptop situation and my > brain. No hope for the latter, but as for the former, I got stressed > and didn't notice that I am in fact between laptop setups and the guix > checkout I had on one machine isn't the same

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Ricardo, can you see if 834b8a4110 fixes the problem? It does not seem to fix this problem. “gnu/machine/ssh.scm” still isn’t included. -- Ricardo

Re: Down with PYTHONPATH!

On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 12:45:19PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hallo Ricardo, > > ich wollte meine Fäden zu diesem Thema wieder aufnehmen und meine > bisherigen Erkenntnisse so zusammenstellen, dass jmd. anderes auch etwas > damit anfangen kann (und ich kein Flaschenhals bin). > > Da ich mich

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

Ricardo, can you see if 834b8a4110 fixes the problem? Jakob L. Kreuze writes: > Hi, Ricardo! > > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Me! I tried to use it on ci.guix.gnu.org to upgrade a node, but it >> failed like this: >> >> rekado@berlin /root/maintenance/hydra$ guix deploy deploy-berlin-node.scm >>

I didn't break guix in the way I thought

Okay, the main things that are broken are my laptop situation and my brain. No hope for the latter, but as for the former, I got stressed and didn't notice that I am in fact between laptop setups and the guix checkout I had on one machine isn't the same that I had on the other. So there were probl

I broke guix (no code for module (guix remote))

Looks like the most recent failure is my own fault: error: failed to load 'gnu/machine/ssh.scm': ice-9/eval.scm:293:34: no code for module (guix remote) Some deprecated features have been used. Set the environment variable GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED to "detailed" and rerun the program to get more inf

Re: Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap!

I dream to reach a (digital) place, where a Guix Logo brights in the center of the door (intro web page), and scattered all around it, signposts (Links) of all imaginable languages, broadcast "Welcome" (Bienvenido, Nnabata, أهلا بك, 歡迎, добро пожаловать, ...). Singular is, many digital adv

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

Hi, Ricardo! Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Me! I tried to use it on ci.guix.gnu.org to upgrade a node, but it > failed like this: > > rekado@berlin /root/maintenance/hydra$ guix deploy deploy-berlin-node.scm > Backtrace: >8 (primitive-load "/home/rekado/.config/guix/current/bin/��") > In

Re: Down with PYTHONPATH!

Hallo Ricardo, ich wollte meine Fäden zu diesem Thema wieder aufnehmen und meine bisherigen Erkenntnisse so zusammenstellen, dass jmd. anderes auch etwas damit anfangen kann (und ich kein Flaschenhals bin). Da ich mich seit 1 Jahr nicht mehr richtige damit beschäftigt habe, scheitere ich an einem

Re: packaging postgrest, haskell patches

Timothy Sample writes: >> I think we should get input from Timothy, Ricardo, and anyone with an >> interest in Haskell packaging. But I think you’re a good candidate for >> the honorific position of Haskell Package Overseer. :-) > > Since their first contribution I’ve thinking to myself “I ho

Re: "guix deploy" is in git master

Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Huge congratulations to Jakob in that "guix deploy" has just hit git > master! I second this. Thank you Jakob! > Now who's going to be the first brave soul to use this for server > deployment? ;) Me! I tried to use it on ci.guix.gnu.org to upgrade a node

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Remove ghc-parsec, ghc-stm, ghc-text, ghc-xhtml.

Hi Robert, > Could we do something in guix like what nixpkgs does, where the dependencies > are encoded, but then “nulled” depending on the compiler version? > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-ghc-8.4.x.nix#L10 Yes, we could do this i