zimoun writes:
> The issue is that the highlight is not done and I am not happy with it. :-)
> Have you a fix for that?
What do you want to do exactly? Underline the links?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pierre,
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 20:36, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> This patch looks good to me. If no one objects I'd like to merge it.
Thank you to give a look.
The issue is that the highlight is not done and I am not happy with it. :-)
Have you a fix for that?
> > +
This patch looks good to me. If no one objects I'd like to merge it.
> + (commit (channel-commit channel))
> + (transformer hyperlink))
>"Return a hyperlink for COMMIT in CHANNEL, using COMMIT as the hyperlink's
> -text.
This should allow us to close:
https://issues.guix.info/issue/39217
https://issues.guix.info/issue/38447
And other issues I'm not aware of?
Mathieu
Hello,
Here are two patches that should fix the "Installer fails when
restarted" issue.
For memory, the issue is caused by the store overlay created at
cow-store service start that I was unable to remove. Failing to remove
this overlay, caused the target device to be seen as busy by the kernel
Ludovic Courtès 写道：
Nope (‘inherit’ is purely syntactic, it doesn’t “live on” at run
time.)
What would it buy you, though?
In addition to what Gábor mentioned, ‘guix refresh -l’ rebuild
numbers can be dangerously misleading when inheritance is
involved.
Would this not be useful
Le 10 février 2020 03:09:57 GMT-05:00, Pierre Neidhardt a
écrit :
>zimoun writes:
>
>>> Say FOO has BAR in its closure, but not in the explicit inputs, how
>can
>>> I figure out which of the indirect inputs drags BAR in?
>>
>> I do not understand what you are looking for, but there is already:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 09:09, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> zimoun writes:
> > I do not understand what you are looking for, but there is already:
> >
> >guix graph -t reverse-package
> > guix graph -t reverse-bag
>
> Yes, but this produces way too big a graph, which was my point below.
Hello
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:50 AM zimoun wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 15:33, Vincent Legoll wrote:
>
> > I cannot understand the "come" line 774 in guix/ui.scm
> > added by:
> > a07d5e558b5403dad0a59776b950b6b02169c249
>
> You are proposing to remove the word 'come' in the comment, right?
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> zimoun writes:
>
>> You could propose such feature to the Guix Data Service.
>> For example, on this webpage [1], the history of all the Git package
>> in Guix is shown. The closure size could be reported.
>>
>> [1]
Hi,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 22:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Marius Bakke skribis:
> > I wonder if it's feasible to use Guile-Git to generate the patches
> > instead, at the expense of having to download the entire repository
> > for the purpose of extracting one or more (substitutable)
zimoun writes:
>> Say FOO has BAR in its closure, but not in the explicit inputs, how can
>> I figure out which of the indirect inputs drags BAR in?
>
> I do not understand what you are looking for, but there is already:
>
>guix graph -t reverse-package
> guix graph -t reverse-bag
Yes,
12 matches
Mail list logo
