Paul Garlick writes:
> One outstanding puzzle for me is to figure out how to test a package
> definition in a new channel. For example, I have cloned the guix-past
> repository and started to add a new package. However, what is the best
> workflow to attempt a build from the channel? Do you
Hi Brice,
dom 28 jun 2020 às 11:37:32 (1593355052), br...@waegenei.re enviou:
> Hello André,
>
> I tought I already had applied your patch, but I forgot to do it.
> It's now applied as f8945734a5abff69644284231cc47fb67456657b, sorry
> for the delay.
No big deal, thanks for your initiative.
> I
Hi Ludo,
qui 02 jul 2020 às 11:36:24 (1593700584), l...@gnu.org enviou:
> Hi André,
>
> Applied, but without those evil tabs that ‘guix lint’ reported. ;-)
That's embarrassing. I could swear I had removed those before sending.
> The closure as reported by ‘guix size’ is 96.7 MiB for
Dear Pauk,
On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 at 18:56, Paul Garlick
wrote:
> One outstanding puzzle for me is to figure out how to test a package
> definition in a new channel. For example, I have cloned the guix-past
> repository and started to add a new package. However, what is the best
> workflow to
Hi Simon,
Thank you for organising the day.
> We are interested to hear your feedback. Especially about what pass,
> what fail and what you have learnt, if you enjoyed the experience, or on
> the contrary if you not, what could be improved for the next round.
One outstanding puzzle for me is
zimoun writes:
> On the Guix side, a missing feature is to search back in history, i.e.,
> somehow improves [2] (which starts 2019-01-01) and be able to find the
> commit (or range of commits) which provided foo@x.y and bar@a.b
>
> 2:
Dear,
Thank you all for joining!
A PAD is still open at:
https://mensuel.framapad.org/p/guix-hackathon-9hlj?lang=en
Please add whatever you have been up. Or drop an email.
We are interested to hear your feedback. Especially about what pass,
what fail and what you have learnt, if you
