Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

2020-09-29 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Mark H Weaver writes: > LLVM is an optional input for Mesa which enables the Gallium 'llvmpipe' > driver, a fast software rasterizer that uses LLVM to do runtime code > generation. > > https://docs.mesa3d.org/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe.html > > Among other things, this allows use of the GNOME She

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

2020-09-29 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
zimoun writes: Please consider I'm still on Emacs 26.3 since one package I use does not work with 27.1... and I still have not tested "the bug" in a pure anvironmentt with emacs 27.1 only > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: [...] >> AFAIU having a public emacs-lucid in Gu

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

2020-09-29 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Hello Mark, thank you for your interest. Mark H Weaver writes: [...] >> IMHO it's useful to have emacs-lucid in official Guix, with subsitutes >> available for end users (I'm not using emacs in daemon mode over X11 >> over SSH for fear of chrashes). > > FYI, our 'emacs-no-x-toolkit' package h

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

2020-09-29 Thread zimoun
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 10:42, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Please consider I'm still on Emacs 26.3 since one package I use does not > work with 27.1... and I still have not tested "the bug" in a pure > anvironmentt with emacs 27.1 only Ouch! Which one is it? > I'm affected by that bug every tim

Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

2020-09-29 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
Hello Simon, zimoun writes: > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 10:42, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > >> Please consider I'm still on Emacs 26.3 since one package I use does not >> work with 27.1... and I still have not tested "the bug" in a pure >> anvironmentt with emacs 27.1 only > > Ouch! Which one is it

Release v1.2 timetable

2020-09-29 Thread zimoun
Hi Guixers, The last v1.1.0 had been released [1] a couple of months ago. Since then, a lot of commits with nice features. And new features deserve new release. :-) What do you think if the freeze starts on this Friday Oct., 2nd and the unfreeze as soon as possible? (Ideally less than one week

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

2020-09-29 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Zimoun, On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:16:30 +0200 zimoun wrote: > b. fix bugs severity:important,serious [3,4] or report Bug #43513 means that all armhf substitutes built for armhf on anything else than armhf (especially those built on aarch64) are untrustworthy. I'm working on fixing it (Patch #