Re: Release v1.2 timetable

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:16:30PM +0200, zimoun wrote: > To help the release process, please: > […] > d. translate Julien, shall I just push my translation without going through the TP? Regards, Florian

Re: u-boot for beagleboard

Hi Vagrant and Danny, First of all, I cannot start without saying: thank you for you effort and time. Danny Milosavljevic writes: > On Thu, 01 Oct 2020 10:15:40 -0700 > Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> Maybe make-u-boot-package should be extended to support passing a list >> of "common" names for

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

I'll try sendinq them a tarball for 1.2. They won't accept new pot files, but maybe they'll update existing ones. You can push directly whatever is not on the TP. Le 5 octobre 2020 06:18:36 GMT-04:00, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" a écrit : >On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:16:30PM +0200, zimoun wrot

Re: Translating the web site

Hi Julien, Julien Lepiller skribis: > I've sent them all an email. Let's see what they say. I think we’re done, no? Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: Translating the web site

Hi Julien, Julien Lepiller skribis: > Le 24 septembre 2020 03:25:56 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" > a écrit : >>Hi, >> >>Julien Lepiller skribis: >> >>> As soon as we can host the translation files on a separate project on >>> savannah, we can get it running at translate.fedora-project.org >>

Re: Problem bootstrapping Guix - "make update-guix-package" result: no code for module (gcrypt hash)

Hi, Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > I'm trying to bootstrap current Guix (master) from Guix past (1.1.0 binary > tarball). > > The goal is: I want to have only guix-the-package-manager at a specific guix > commit (!) available inside a Docker image. Why build Guix from source? I guess it’s enou

Re: Failing CI evaluation for testing branch

Hi Guillaume, Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the > evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw > ends with: You mean the ‘staging’ branch? > guix/inferior.scm:247:2: ERROR: > 1. &inferior-exceptio

Re: branch master updated: gnu: gettext-minimal: Mark "test-raise" test XFAIL on the Hurd.

Hi! > commit 2fc298d19c5256eb5609aae7bd35bada59d91685 > Author: Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen > AuthorDate: Mon Oct 5 11:58:16 2020 +0200 > > gnu: gettext-minimal: Mark "test-raise" test XFAIL on the Hurd. > > * gnu/packages/gettext.scm (gettext-minimal)[arguments]: When compiling >

Re: branch master updated: gnu: gettext-minimal: Mark "test-raise" test XFAIL on the Hurd.

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 02:24:31PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Hi! > > > commit 2fc298d19c5256eb5609aae7bd35bada59d91685 > > Author: Jan (janneke) Nieuwenhuizen > > AuthorDate: Mon Oct 5 11:58:16 2020 +0200 > > > > gnu: gettext-minimal: Mark "test-raise" test XFAIL on the Hurd. > >

Re: Problems with the test suite

Hi, Jesse Gibbons skribis: > I'm still working on making 43193 ready to apply. I added a test, and > it looks like my to the build script --with-source option broke > something. I am getting error messages, but I don't know where in the > code they are occurring. Is there any way I can get a sta

Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers

Hi, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > I've pushed a commit which adds the synopsis and the description to the > database. > > 0127cfa5d089857a716bf7b0a167f31cc6dd > > The quite surprising result is that these new details only cost 1 MiB extra! > > I can then search packages and it's super fast: >

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

Hi Julien, Julien Lepiller writes: > I'll try sendinq them a tarball for 1.2. They won't accept new pot > files, but maybe they'll update existing ones. Maybe I'm loosing something between all the mail received through this list or on the IRC where I almost never connect to, but why wouldn't tra

Re: Failing CI evaluation for staging branch

Ludovic Courtès skribis: > Hi Guillaume, > > Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > >> Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the >> evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw >> ends with: > > You mean the ‘staging’ branch? > Yes, I meant 'sta

Re: Translating the web site

Le 5 octobre 2020 08:17:59 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" a écrit : >Hi Julien, > >Julien Lepiller skribis: > >> Le 24 septembre 2020 03:25:56 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" > a écrit : >>>Hi, >>> >>>Julien Lepiller skribis: >>> As soon as we can host the translation files on a separate proj

Re: Mailing Lists List

Hi, Greg Hogan skribis: > When I google for “guix mailing lists” I am directed to > https://savannah.gnu.org/mail/?group=guix > > which does not include guix-devel. It is returned as my second google link > and also of course listed on the Guix web

Re: Building a library as both static and dynamic

Hi, Greg Hogan skribis: > Is there a best practice or example for building a library twice, both > static and dynamic? I submitted patch #43620, and in working on > another library have the same issue. These are cmake builds with a > parameter declaration for either a static or dynamic build, no

Re: Rewriting inputs and ’arguments’ after patch #43578

Hi, zimoun skribis: > Let consider the package ’emacs-magit’. It does not depend on > ’emacs-minimal’ but instead the argument is replaced by ’emacs-no-x’, > see: > > (build-system emacs-build-system) > (arguments >`(#:emacs ,emacs-no-x;module support is require

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

Hi, Julien Lepiller skribis: > I'll try sendinq them a tarball for 1.2. Would be nice! There’s quite a lot of new material to translate now, so better leave people time to work on it. > They won't accept new pot files, but maybe they'll update existing > ones. Sure. The website POT files we

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

To be clear, translate guix, guix-packages and guix-manual using the TP. Guix-cookbook and guix-website will not be available, so you can translate them directly. Le 5 octobre 2020 08:38:32 GMT-04:00, "Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas" a écrit : >Hi Julien, > >Julien Lepiller writes: >> I'll try sen

Re: linux-libre updates, timeliness

Hi Leo, Leo Famulari skribis: > I just pushed commit 51eb3e11 [0], bringing our linux-libre kernel > packages up to date. > > It's September 30 here. The commit is dated September 28, because that's > when I made it. These kernels were released upstream on September 26. Of course we can always

Re: u-boot for beagleboard

Hi, Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas skribis: > I see two main possibilities for the "translation units" in these cases: > > - When the extra data is a "non-localizable string", I'd rather use a > format string for the template, and insert the data through the format > specifier, possibly with a me

Re: Translating the web site

Le 5 octobre 2020 08:15:26 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" a écrit : >Hi Julien, > >Julien Lepiller skribis: > >> I've sent them all an email. Let's see what they say. > >I think we’re done, no? Unless I missed them, I still haven't got an answer from Mario Blättermann and Znavko. I'm a bit wo

Re: Rewriting inputs and ’arguments’ after patch #43578

Hi Ludo, On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 15:46, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Therefore, it is not possible to rewrite this “inputs“ (using the patch > > [1]), as the dry-run shows: > > > > $ guix build emacs-magit --with-input=emacs-no-x=emacs-next -n > > AFAICS, it’s working as expected: > > --8<--

New template for 'guix' made available

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have any questions, send them to .) A new POT file for textual domain 'guix' has been made available to the language teams for translation. It is archived as: https://translationproject.org/POT-files/gu

New template for 'guix-packages' made available

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have any questions, send them to .) A new POT file for textual domain 'guix-packages' has been made available to the language teams for translation. It is archived as: https://translationproject.org/POT

Re: Failing CI evaluation for staging branch

Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: >> >>> Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the >>> evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw >>> ends with: >> >> You me

New template for 'guix-manual' made available

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have any questions, send them to .) A new POT file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been made available to the language teams for translation. It is archived as: https://translationproject.org/POT-f

Re: Failing CI evaluation for staging branch

Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès skribis: >> >>> Hi Guillaume, >>> >>> Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: >>> Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/ev

New Spanish PO file for 'guix' (version 1.2.0-pre1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix/es.po (We can arrange things so that in th

Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers

Hi Ludo! Ludovic Courtès writes: > Nice! Thanks! > Could you post a summary of what you have done, what’s left to do, and > how you’d like to integrate it? (If you’ve already done it, my > apologies, but you can resend a link. :-)) What I've done: mostly a database benchmark. - Textual dat

New French PO file for 'guix' (version 1.2.0-pre1)

Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation Project robot. A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix' has been submitted by the French team of translators. The file is available at: https://translationproject.org/latest/guix/fr.po (We can arrange things so that in the

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

Hi, On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 15:49, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Would be nice! There’s quite a lot of new material to translate now, so > better leave people time to work on it. Do we fix a "deadline"? I mean a (movable) date as objective for releasing? Initially, I thought about Oct. 29th? WDYT?

Re: linux-libre updates, timeliness

Hi, Just out of curiosity, is it the case if only Linux Kernel team itself separated the controversial (with GNU folks, at least 😄) aspect of Linux as some build option, we don't have to maintain this "LinuxLibre" in the first place? Cheers, Yasu > On Oct 5, 2020, at 22:53, Ludovic Courtès

Re: Release v1.2 timetable

Hey zimoun, > What is the status of the installer? I don't think there are known issues at the moment. I have started testing it on my laptop, by booting on a flash drive and installing on another one, while being quite anxious for my main hard drive :p. Maybe it would be nice to start a 1.2 b