On November 26, 2020, Jelle Licht wrote:
> On other distros it defaults to a location that is not writable by
> normal users either;
Indeed I can confirm that Ubuntu node also has this problem.
> Node doesn't do this on other distros either, correct?
> [snip]
> Another way folks solved this
Hey,
Ryan Prior writes:
> Hi folks! I stumbled across an issue with the node package today and
> wanted to send a report before I forget.
>
> npm assumes that the global prefix is a writeable folder. Operations
> like `npm link` will fail if it isn't. Right now our node package
> doesn't set a
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:17 +0100
zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:28, raingloom wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> >> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4
> >> > minutes, sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:31:53PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> Oh yea, regarding that, I really think it would have made a whole lot
> more sense if people just sent in a photo, instead of DDoS-ing the
> network.
I don't know how BBB works nor did I measure it, but one can expect a
videochat feed
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:47:46 +0100
Michael Rohleder wrote:
> raingloom writes:
> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently
> > it's still pretty heavy.
>
> I had a similar issue, but only in the
Hi folks! I stumbled across an issue with the node package today and
wanted to send a report before I forget.
npm assumes that the global prefix is a writeable folder. Operations
like `npm link` will fail if it isn't. Right now our node package
doesn't set a prefix, so it defaults to the
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 13:24, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:50:41PM +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote:
>> Browser is icecat 78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,
>> except "Surfingkeys".
>>
>> Computer is something like this (neofetch):
>
> [...]
>
> Hm... it
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 23:28, raingloom wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
>> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
>> > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently
>> > it's still pretty heavy.
What
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 22:53:21 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:26:37PM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> > My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> > sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently
> > it's still pretty heavy.
>
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:13:28 +0100
Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Just saw that GNU Guix 1.2.0 released was recently released.
In the Ode to 1.2.0 the back vocals are done by Festival (likely
singing-mode.scm).
Can I have the XML file that that was given to Festival.
>
> Hey,
>
> > One this patch
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:50:41PM +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote:
> Browser is icecat 78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,
> except "Surfingkeys".
>
> Computer is something like this (neofetch):
[...]
Hm... it seems unlikely that this computer, which is relatively
powerful,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 03:02:28PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cool for the change!
>
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 14:27, Danny Milosavljevic
> wrote:
>
> >> I only removed trailing #t in a couple of files unlikely to result in
> >> merge conflicts down the road, as Marius rightfully suggested
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:19:17PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Since this historical place would not change* “soon”, first because we
> like it (I speak for myself) and second because it is accommodating,
> ideas to deal with poor network are welcome. :-)
The standard solution is to do cellular
Hi Simon,
zimoun writes:
> As Leo asked: Can you say what web browser you were using? Bonus points
> if you can give us the exact version, assuming it's from Guix. And what
> kind of computer did you use?
Browser is icecat 78.5.0-guix0-preview1 with all extensions disabled,
except
Hi,
Cool for the change!
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 14:27, Danny Milosavljevic
wrote:
>> I only removed trailing #t in a couple of files unlikely to result in
>> merge conflicts down the road, as Marius rightfully suggested on IRC.
>
> I agree that we shouldn't graciously remove "#t"s in existing
Hi Ludo,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:17:41 +0100
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> With these changes, the return value of origin snippets and build phases
> is now ignored.
Good riddance :)
No, seriously, good change.
> I only removed trailing #t in a couple of files unlikely to result in
> merge
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 11:47, Michael Rohleder wrote:
> I had a similar issue, but only in the break where we had lots of
> webcams: After about 5 or 6 webcams, my (slow) net connection became
> satturated and BBB seems to loose more and more
> informations/connections/gets out of
Hi Arun,
Thank you for your kind words.
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 21:13, Arun Isaac wrote:
> I'm happy it was an online event and I could participate. I live in
> India and travelling to Europe is a bank-breaking endeavour that is
> normally out of the question. I think even future offline Guix
Leo Famulari writes:
> Yes, absolutely! I do this sort of thing — hybrid events — for my day
> job, and I could help make it happen in the future.
Thank you, that is much appreciated!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I just wanted to report (although this is probably already known) that I had to
wait for a long time (probably more than a minute) staring at "Welcome to
Grub!" screen upon reboot, after accumulating thousands of guix system
generations. I was experimenting with something and I suspected
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> With these changes, the return value of origin snippets and build phases
> is now ignored.
> ...
>
> That’s it! Thoughts? Comments?
Indeed better! Return ‘#t’ feel perlish, perl requires return ‘1’ at
the end of each module.
raingloom writes:
> My only issue was that I had to reconnect audio every 3-4 minutes,
> sometimes having to do a full reload. BBB was nice, but apparently it's
> still pretty heavy.
I had a similar issue, but only in the break where we had lots of
webcams: After about 5 or 6 webcams, my (slow)
22 matches
Mail list logo
