Lee Fallat 写道：
Hey,
Hi, welcome, and thanks for the patch!
I responded on IRC (mail client's being stupid) but you don't seem
to be on-line, so here's a less ephemeral copy:
There's a list specifically for patches (unimaginatively named
guix-patches@), tracked together with bug-guix@ over
Hey,
It'd be useful to explicitly state how to do this. While my guess of
exiting the shell (or ctrl-d) was correct, not everyone will know!
Also there are people like myself who like to reduce storage usage if
possible on machines which don't have much, like on netbooks or ultra-
books. I've men
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Pjotr Prins writes:
>
>> To keep riding the wave I was thinking we could organise a GNU Hurd
>> day in 3 months. That an idea? I have been toying with GNU Hurd in a
>> VM and I think it is nice.
>
> It would be nice to have a little hack day to learn ways to hack on the
Am Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:17:34PM -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> What do you think? Should we stick with the plan I wrote in the manual?
> Or change it?
>From what I understood of the discussion, I would also go with Tobias's and
Efraim's suggestion: There is a core-updates branch that is constant
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Ah, there's my blind spot. What kinds of mistakes? When is it harmful to
> push to the open branch?
Mistakes caused by lack of communication about the status of the
branches.
During the recent staging cycle, people kept pu
Hi Leo!
Leo Famulari 写道：
I thought that the use of -frozen and -next might help avoid
mistakes
during the active part of the cycles.
Ah, there's my blind spot. What kinds of mistakes? When is it
harmful to push to the open branch?
I say ‘the open branch’ because core-updates and core-upd
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:34:13AM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Leo Famulari 写道：
> > During those periods, new patches can be pushed to "core-updates-next"
> > and "staging-next".
>
> I suggest just ‘branching’ staging & core-updates to a -frozen snapshot and
> keeping both staging & core
Hi Guix!
we get some perplexed users who are downgrading their VM and systems
because they never run guix pull. I think they now get a warning, but
it would be nice if they didn't get that warning in the first place.
For a VM for instance, a user might want to run it, and extend it with
"guix sys
Leo,
Almost perfect, thanks ;-)
Leo Famulari 写道：
During those periods, new patches can be pushed to
"core-updates-next"
and "staging-next".
I suggest just ‘branching’ staging & core-updates to a -frozen
snapshot and keeping both staging & core-updates in a state of
perpetual summer.
Kind
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:14:24PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Leo Famulari skribis:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 04:09:15PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > >> My concern about that is that it basically swaps what we hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
