On February 13, 2021, Hartmut Goebel
wrote:
> Am 09.02.21 um 17:16 schrieb Léo Le Bouter:
> > Commonly awesome lists are used to share links to all things related
> to
> > some topic or some software
>
> I wonder why not just calling it "Link list" then? [This] would be
> much
> easier to unders
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 06:11:08PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> Thanks to Ricardo support I was able to setup a Wireguard tunnel between
> berlin and the overdrive1. It seems to work pretty well and
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/workers shows that it is building some packages.
I noticed that the n
Leo,
On 2021-02-13 19:21, Leo Famulari wrote:
Due to overwhelming demand both on and off list, the bikeshed has been
repainted.
...and the second-floor window (it's... a big shed?) no longer reads
'Way Out ->'.
One can trivialise anything.
Genuine thanks for pushing for improvement,
T G-R
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 12:24:50PM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 12.02.21 um 21:49 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> > From what I understood of the discussion, I would also go with Tobias's and
> > Efraim's suggestion: There is a core-updates branch that is constantly open
> > and where people can push
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 04:07:24AM +0100, raingloom wrote:
> Wait what???
> I was under the impression that talks would be recorded. So they...
> weren't??? At all??? Am I waiting for an upload in vain?
The FOSDEM talks were recorded.
The Guix day we made more informal. I am sorry, we did not rec
Am 09.02.21 um 17:16 schrieb Léo Le Bouter:
Commonly awesome lists are used to share links to all things related to
some topic or some software
I wonder why not just calling it "Link list" then? Thsi would be much
easier to understand for non-nerds.
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goeb
Am 12.02.21 um 21:49 schrieb Andreas Enge:
From what I understood of the discussion, I would also go with Tobias's and
Efraim's suggestion: There is a core-updates branch that is constantly open
and where people can push; this does not seem to leave a possibility of
mistake, almost by definition
Am 11.02.21 um 23:42 schrieb Leo Famulari:
The default branch names remain "core-updates" and "staging".
[…]
During those periods, new patches can be pushed to "core-updates-next"
and "staging-next".
What should be the use of these *-next branches. I can't see any except
confusing committers
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hello,
>
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis:
>
>> Attached the notes from the "Bootstrap what's next" session yesterday.
>
> Thanks for sharing!
>
>> - Making the guix build system code less dependent on Guile and more
>> dependent on MES
>
> Not necessarily more dependent on M
Hi,
Last month, we found that
--8<---cut here---start->8---
// prereq.c
#if defined __GNUC__ && defined __GNUC_MINOR__
# define __GNUC_PREREQ(maj, min) \
((__GNUC__ << 16) + __GNUC_MINOR__ >= ((maj) << 16) + (min))
#else
# define __GNUC_PREREQ(maj, min)
10 matches
Mail list logo
