On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:37:11PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> however there are not sorted which is annoying. And there is a tiny bug
> because the bug 1 is listed.
For some reason, when I added the first "blockers", debbugs also added
the "1" bug. I tried to remove it, but it can't be done.
Hi,
Using Emacs «M-x debbugs-gnu-bugs RET 47297 RET b» I get this list:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
47239 normal Konrad Hinsen Test failure in tests/publish.scm with
commit 1955ef93b76e51cab5bed4c90f7eb9df7035355a
47173 normal,pat zimoun
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 16:41, c4t0 wrote:
> zimoun writes:
> yes! I don't know if is really related with
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35743 and is a layout
> problem or it doesn't know how to parse 'common'.
I have not read carefully the bug report you mention, neither
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:24:40PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> I already volunteered (privately) to host the same (1 or 2 WS power-class),
> currently on ADSL uplink (so not for substitute distribution, only building),
> FTTH in the future, no UPS though.
The architecture of the build arm is
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 21:24 +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:51 PM Leo Famulari
> wrote:
> > > We bought a handful of Overdrive 1000 in the past (they are no
> > > longer
> > > sold), and hosting was always an obstacle.
> >
> > I volunteer to host one or two
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:51 PM Leo Famulari wrote:
> > We bought a handful of Overdrive 1000 in the past (they are no longer
> > sold), and hosting was always an obstacle.
>
> I volunteer to host one or two workstation-type 64-bit ARM machines.
I already volunteered (privately) to host
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> This seems to be a misunderstanding. The first step is to use the money
> we already have but cannot exchange for hardware, because
>
> - finding appropriate hardware that you can actually buy is not easy
> - hosting needs to be
zimoun writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 04:19, c4t0 wrote:
>
>> I'm having problems with 'guix import' in my environment:
>> $guix import hackage -t ghc-events
>> Syntax error: unexpected token : common (at line 44, column 0)
>> Syntax error: unexpected end of input
>> guix import:
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 04:19, c4t0 wrote:
> I'm having problems with 'guix import' in my environment:
> $guix import hackage -t ghc-events
> Syntax error: unexpected token : common (at line 44, column 0)
> Syntax error: unexpected end of input
> guix import: error: failed to download cabal
Julien Lepiller writes:
> Le 23 mars 2021 18:25:38 GMT-04:00, c4t0 a écrit :
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm having trouble importing a package from hackage, so I tried to
>>debug
>>the import source code. After cloning guix I found that I can't start a
>>pure environment:
>>
>>guix environment guix --pure
c4t0 writes:
it appears to be this bug:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35743
It's marked in the hackage.scm to expected fail, but the layout problem
with cabal files seems pretty ubiquos. I'll try to look at it, and move
the discussion there.
If anyone can give me some tip to
> Loopback is handled by the ‘loopback’ shepherd service, which is
> provided via ‘%base-services’. Perhaps you just need to have your
> service depend on it?
My service requires `tor`, which itself requires `loopback`, but it was still
unable to access `127.0.0.1:9050` until I added a
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 1:02 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> raid5atemyhomework raid5atemyhomew...@protonmail.com skribis:
>
> > I'm not sure you can afford to keep it simple.
>
> It has limitations but it does the
On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 23:41 -0700, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, I have merged wip-ppc64le-for-master to master and closed bug
> 47182. I have also deleted the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch.
>
> Later this week, I will update the manual to mention that
> powerpc64le-linux is supported,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:41:56PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI, I have merged wip-ppc64le-for-master to master and closed bug
> 47182. I have also deleted the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch.
>
> Later this week, I will update the manual to mention that
> powerpc64le-linux is
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 19:42, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Andreas Enge writes:
>> $ guix package -A imagemagick
>> imagemagick 6.9.12-2g out,doc gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm:132:2
>> imagemagick 6.9.11-48 out,doc gnu/packages/imagemagick.scm:48:2
>>
>> $ guix build
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 23:41, Chris Marusich wrote:
> FYI, I have merged wip-ppc64le-for-master to master and closed bug
> 47182. I have also deleted the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch.
>
> Later this week, I will update the manual to mention that
> powerpc64le-linux is supported, and I
Chris Marusich writes:
> FYI, I have merged wip-ppc64le-for-master to master and closed bug
> 47182. I have also deleted the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch.
Whoo, congratulations :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
FYI, I have merged wip-ppc64le-for-master to master and closed bug
47182. I have also deleted the wip-ppc64le-for-master branch.
Later this week, I will update the manual to mention that
powerpc64le-linux is supported, and I will update the "release" target
of the Makefile so that we can
19 matches
Mail list logo
