Re: What’s next?

Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 06:26:57PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: >> What about Hurd? > > I think the answer will be: what about it? :) > > We always welcome Hurd-related work here in Guix. > I suppose someone should fix the Hurd vulnerabilities as reported here:

Scala package

Hi Guix! I have the attached file that build Scala, although it's not bootstrapped at all. It contains %binary-scala, a few dependencies of Scala we haven't packaged yet, and the final scala, built from %binary-scala, without sbt (which requires Scala too). Since I've tried and failed to

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September?

Hi Simon, zimoun writes: > Hi Maxim, > >>> Note also that we were “only” 3 weeks late thanks to the hard work of >>> zimoun and Leo early on keeping track of everything that needed to be >>> addressed. If someone wants to propose a date for the next release and >>> take responsibility as

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September?

Hi, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > Perhaps we can aim for the next release mid-September (core-updates). > I'm not too sure of the status of core-updates right now, but last time > I worked on it was in a rather good state. Sounds like a plan! We should start working on getting ‘core-updates’

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September?

Hi Bengt, Bengt Richter writes: [...] > This sounds like planning activity. > > Gnome has an app called planner ;-) > > Would it make sense to discuss a way to put these rc- and other related goals > on a gantt chart? > > Maybe even automate import from mailing list emails marked with e.g. >

Re: Bringing substitutes from the Guix Build Coordinator to users

Hi, Christopher Baines skribis: > If there's effort put in to getting substitutes served from bayfront, > why do you suggest not documenting how to get those substitutes in the > manual? Mostly because bayfront is not as powerful as the build farm behind ci.guix. Ludo’.

Re: What’s next?

Hi Brendan, Brendan Tildesley skribis: > Since you asked I'll dump my nebulous wishes here. Sorry that I don't have > very > concrete suggestions and solutions, just things I think could be better. I > should also state that 99% of my thoughts about Guix are through the filter of > "I want to

Re: What’s next?

Hi, Efraim Flashner skribis: > package-transformations applied to the operating-system field of the > os-config. Ah, that’s a good one, but possibly tricky! What would it operate on? Any package? Only those showing up in the system profile? The former is not really possible; the latter is.

guix and mirroring dataset

HI, Does the guix project and members suggest best guix-ish practices for managing on premise mirrors of large file-based data-sets such as appear in genomics HPC evironments? Perhaps a guix-ish response to [Go Get Data \(GGD\) is a framework that facilitates reproducible access to genomic

What’s next?

Since you asked I'll dump my nebulous wishes here. Sorry that I don't have very concrete suggestions and solutions, just things I think could be better. I should also state that 99% of my thoughts about Guix are through the filter of "I want to build a Guix based desktop distribution that can be

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September? (was: Re: GNU Guix 1.3.0 released)

Hi all, On +2021-05-17 10:43:36 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:55:39PM +0200, zimoun wrote: > > I remember a plot sent to guix-maintaainers about the number of grafts, > > the core-updates merges and the release dates. I am not sure it is > > really interesting and it is

Re: Exim CVEs (21Nails)

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:26:36PM +0200, Taylan Kammer wrote: > On the same day that article was published, neat! :-) There was advance warning, so we were ready :)

Re: Exim CVEs (21Nails)

On 17.05.2021 16:44, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Taylan Kammer wrote: >> Hi Guix people, >> >> Just wanted to make sure everyone's aware, since we package Exim: >> >>

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September?

Hi, Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:55:39PM +0200, zimoun wrote: >> I remember a plot sent to guix-maintaainers about the number of grafts, >> the core-updates merges and the release dates. I am not sure it is >> really interesting and it is worth to resend it, or maybe

Re: What’s next?

On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 06:26:57PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > What about Hurd? I think the answer will be: what about it? :) We always welcome Hurd-related work here in Guix.

Re: Exim CVEs (21Nails)

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 12:10:26PM +0200, Taylan Kammer wrote: > Hi Guix people, > > Just wanted to make sure everyone's aware, since we package Exim: > > https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-research/2021/05/04/21nails-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-exim-mail-server > > "Last fall, the Qualys

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September? (was: Re: GNU Guix 1.3.0 released)

On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:55:39PM +0200, zimoun wrote: > I remember a plot sent to guix-maintaainers about the number of grafts, > the core-updates merges and the release dates. I am not sure it is > really interesting and it is worth to resend it, or maybe dumping the > Cuirass database to

Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September? (was: Re: GNU Guix 1.3.0 released)

Hi Maxim, >> Note also that we were “only” 3 weeks late thanks to the hard work of >> zimoun and Leo early on keeping track of everything that needed to be >> addressed. If someone wants to propose a date for the next release and >> take responsibility as “release keeper”, we’ll all welcome

Re: What’s next?

Hi, > • Completing and consolidating Disarchive support (see > ): continuously building the > Disarchive database, making sure it’s replicated or backed up by > SWH, and having a blog post or two explaining the whole endeavor > (I’m looking at

Exim CVEs (21Nails)

Hi Guix people, Just wanted to make sure everyone's aware, since we package Exim: https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-research/2021/05/04/21nails-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-exim-mail-server "Last fall, the Qualys Research Team engaged in a thorough code audit of Exim and discovered 21

Re: Questions regarding Python packaging

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that an updated version (includes python-toolchain) of this proposal is still looking for a code review or further discussion. So if you feel confident about touching python-build-system, please have a look at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/46848#1 I’d be nice to