Re: Tricking peer review

2021-10-15 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hello, Em sexta-feira, 15 de outubro de 2021, às 19:03:22 -03, Liliana Marie Prikler escreveu: > Am Freitag, den 15.10.2021, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > Consider this file as if it were a patch you’re reviewing: > > > > (define-module (content-addressed)) > > (use-modules (guix) > >

Re: Tricking peer review

2021-10-15 Thread Ryan Prior
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > A "bad" commit might still be perfectly fine to fetch certain things from if > they're unaffected by it The database could store a comment with each "bad" commit hash to help people decide if they're affected. It could even go further and include a list of tai

Re: Tricking peer review

2021-10-15 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Freitag, den 15.10.2021, 22:28 + schrieb Ryan Prior: > On Friday, October 15th, 2021 at 10:03 PM, Liliana Marie Prikler < > liliana.prik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On the plus side, such an attack would be recorded forever in Git > > > > > > history. > > > > On the minus side, time-mach

Re: Tricking peer review

2021-10-15 Thread Ryan Prior
On Friday, October 15th, 2021 at 10:03 PM, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > On the plus side, such an attack would be recorded forever in Git > > > > history. > > On the minus side, time-machine makes said record a landmine to step > > into. I've suggested this before and this seems like a good

Re: Tricking peer review

2021-10-15 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi, Am Freitag, den 15.10.2021, 20:54 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Hello, > > Consider this file as if it were a patch you’re reviewing: > (define-module (content-addressed)) > (use-modules (guix) > (guix build-system gnu) > (guix licenses) > (gnu packa

Tricking peer review

2021-10-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Consider this file as if it were a patch you’re reviewing: (define-module (content-addressed)) (use-modules (guix) (guix build-system gnu) (guix licenses) (gnu packages perl)) (define-public sed (package (name "sed") (version "4.8") (sourc

Re: issue with SWH ratelimit (authorization via HTTP header)

2021-10-15 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hello, zimoun writes: > Hi, > > Thanks to Ricardo on #guix-hpc, the issue is: > > `((authorization . (Bearer ,token > > and not ’bearer’. Maybe the process can help. > > It is misleading because the documentation [1] says to use: > > Enter `,help' for help. > scheme@(guix-user)> ,use(we

Re: Wireguard

2021-10-15 Thread crodges
On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 11:35:02 A.M. PDT you wrote: > crodges schreef op wo 06-10-2021 om 09:28 [-0700]: > > [...] > > I was able to create and run the vm. How can I build a .iso image with my > > code changes to install in a vps? I tried to change the code, compile, > > run > > > > guix sy

Neomutt: new version released

2021-10-15 Thread Tim Lee
There's a new version of Neomutt: version 20211015. https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/releases/tag/20211015 Will it be included in Guix?

Re: Substitute retention

2021-10-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! zimoun skribis: >>> missed by both build farms using 2 different strategies to collect the >>> thing to build (fetch every 5 minutes or fetch from guix-commits). It >>> is a quick back to envelope so keep that with some salt. :-) >> >> OK. > > To make it explicit of #1, I was talking about

Re: EXWM

2021-10-15 Thread André A . Gomes
Arun Isaac writes: > Hi André, > >> I remember, back in the day, to what great lengths I went to understand >> what the hell what going on. I had EXWM configured in my Emacs init.el >> file (the sane, standard and documented way of doing it), and I've used >> it before in other distros. > > Just

Re: EXWM

2021-10-15 Thread André A . Gomes
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello, > > Arun Isaac skribis: > I was involved in the packaging of exwm when it was first done, and I hear your frustration. :-) Please do send patches (with me on Cc) addressing the issue, and we can continue our discussion there. >>> >>> As someone who