Hey,
> That's it! Enjoy the latest additions and improvements, and report any
> issues you encounter!
That's great news! Thanks to all the people that have been involved and
special thanks to you Maxim for your commitment.
Mathieu
Hi Maxim,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 22:20, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It'll have to be resolved on core-updates :-).
Well, Julia update can happen in master, IMHO. Even, depending on the
release date, it appears to me doable for the next release. ;-)
Cheers,
simon
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 20:34, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was
> finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid
> uploading any further work there :-).
>
> A tentative release preparation branch 'version-1.4
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was
> finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid
> uploading any further work there :-).
>
> [...]
>
> That's it! Enjoy the latest additions and improvements, and rep
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> zimoun skribis:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>>> The build phases that patch out these features would have to check
>>> for that build system option, much like they check the TESTS?
>>> option before attempting to r
Hi Simon,
zimoun writes:
> Hi,
>
> First, I am not convinced that upgrade Julia from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4 is
> something to do now; especially when the branch is “frozen”. Using
> patches #52117 [1], all failures are fixed for 1.6.3.
>
> 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52117
>
>
> Here a rough attempt
Hello Guix!
In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was
finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid
uploading any further work there :-).
A tentative release preparation branch 'version-1.4.0' was then created
from master, where release-specific
On 2021-12-11 14:57, Josselin Poiret wrote:
Hello,
I submitted a patch. ID: 52470.
Unfortunately I can't find it here for some reason:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52470
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Demis Balbach
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Blake Shaw writes:
> Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
>
> Katherine, reading a big deeper into your user experience report, its really
> so so helpful to have this concrete sort of step-by-step user experience
> report.
Definitely! The first step to resolution is a common understanding.
> Would you
"Leo Famulari" writes:
> It's likely that you need to use a newer version of Go.
Thanks, that did it! With go-1.17 it compiles fine.
Cheers,
Konrad
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Jelle Licht skribis:
>
>> I will work on that. Do we already have a suitable 'bulk change' in the
>> repo? Or should we first run `guix style', and subsequently use that
>> commit as the first entry in the .git-blame-ignore-revs file?
>
> The latter I gu
It's likely that you need to use a newer version of Go.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, at 02:51, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> the version of IPFS in Guix is 0.8, and in view of the important changes
> introduced in 0.10, that's obsolete by now. Which is why I am trying to
> update to 0.11.
>
> My cu
Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
Katherine, reading a big deeper into your user experience report,
its really so so helpful to have this concrete sort of step-by-step
user experience report. Would you mind if I solicit the list
for more reports like this for anyone who might feel like offering them?
A
Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
Katherine this is great material to chew on, much of which I can relate
to!
--
“In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni”
zimoun writes:
Hi Simon, thanks for the input,
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 05:40, Blake Shaw
> wrote:
>
>> --
>> tldr: is there also room to discuss contributing -- and possibly
>> doing a
>> sizeable makeover to -- the *Guile* documentation? If so, I could
>> give a
>> short 5 - 10 minutes
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> My current package definition is attached.
Well, now it is:
(define-public go-ipfs
(package
(name "go-ipfs")
(version "0.11.0")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch/tarbomb)
(uri (string-append
"https://dist.ipfs.io/go-ipfs/v";
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 02:37, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I think it's time to start organising the Guix Days, traditionally held
> around Fosdem.
Nice initiative! Count on me for helping. :-)
> As for how it'll be organised. I propose to do something similar to
> what we need in Nov
Dear Danny,
thanks! That lead me on the right track. In fact it's just
> sudo -E guix ...
without the Varibale name. "-E" passes the whole environment to
sudo. Now the package works (at least on my system) and the Logitech
presenter can be used under EXWM+xcompmgr under guix-system - Great! I
wo
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 05:40, Blake Shaw wrote:
> --
> tldr: is there also room to discuss contributing -- and possibly doing a
> sizeable makeover to -- the *Guile* documentation? If so, I could give a
> short 5 - 10 minutes presentation of what I think should be done (and
> would volunteer
19 matches
Mail list logo