Re: Guix wiki

2022-01-09 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, There is something here: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix -- Vincent Legoll

Re: Branch with only available substitutes ?

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Hi, This question comes up often on #guix. Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. schreef op zo 09-01-2022 om 21:44 [+0100]: > Hi ! > > New user of guix for a few months, still getting used to everything. > Don't hesitate to advise me if I'm doing anything

Re: Having a package browser on guix.gnu.org

2022-01-09 Thread Luis Felipe
On Sunday, January 9th, 2022 at 7:53 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: > Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org writes: > > > Luis Felipe luis.felipe...@protonmail.com skribis: > > > > > But I wonder if it is possible now to make the packages part use any of > > > the Postgres databases that already

Re: Guix wiki

2022-01-09 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-01-09, Matt wrote: > Concern 7: the manual can easily be read and modified while offline > > This is another good point. Things shouldn't be tied to the > internet. > > Fortunately, most wikis allow users to download the wiki (apart from > tools like wget). > > Unfortunately, the

Guix wiki

2022-01-09 Thread Matt
The subject of a wiki came up in the Guix Documentation Meetup thread. The last time it seems a wiki was mentioned was in 2015[fn:1]. Since it's been more than 5 years and the Guix community has grown, I feel it's worth bringing up again. The 2015 post expressed problems with the manual, that

Re: Guix Documentation Meetup

2022-01-09 Thread Matt
> I see that this all seems confusing. Thank you for your response and for acknowledging my perspective. Yes, I find many things about the documentation process confusing. I can't speak for others, but I get the strong sense that I'm not alone in that feeling. > If you have something to >

Branch with only available substitutes ?

2022-01-09 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi ! New user of guix for a few months, still getting used to everything. Don't hesitate to advise me if I'm doing anything wrong ;) I find myself often waiting for heavy packages (ungoogled-chromium, cargo...) to be built as substitutes before updating my system and I find it a bit long to my

Re: Having a package browser on guix.gnu.org

2022-01-09 Thread Christopher Baines
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Luis Felipe skribis: > >> But I wonder if it is possible now to make the packages part use any of the >> Postgres databases that already exist and allow traditional search without >> JavaScript... > > Former Outreachy intern Danjela Lura, together with Chris Baines,

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi, Am Sonntag, dem 09.01.2022 um 20:48 +0300 schrieb Andrew Tropin: > On 2022-01-09 12:19, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Am Sonntag, dem 09.01.2022 um 12:12 +0300 schrieb Andrew Tropin: > > > > > Before fee0bc serialization for text-config worked this way: > > >

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Andrew Tropin schreef op zo 09-01-2022 om 20:59 [+0300]: > [...] > I think we can just rely on something like that: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > #~(call-with-input-file #$(local-file "./files/bashrc") > (@ (ice-9 textual-ports) get-string-all)) >

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Andrew Tropin
On 2022-01-09 13:19, Maxime Devos wrote: > Andrew Tropin schreef op zo 09-01-2022 om 12:12 [+0300]: >> [...] There is another less generalized example, which demonstrates >> how >> serialization of sway configuration works right now. >> >> --8<---cut

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Andrew Tropin
On 2022-01-09 12:19, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Am Sonntag, dem 09.01.2022 um 12:12 +0300 schrieb Andrew Tropin: >> Before fee0bc serialization for text-config worked this way: >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >> `("string here" >>  

Re: Public key pinning in guix?

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Philip McGrath schreef op zo 09-01-2022 om 08:57 [-0500]: > The part of the deprecation of HPKP that seems most relevant is that > some number of servers---I suspect it may be a large number---are > configured under the assumption that no one relies on their using any > particular public key.

Re: Public key pinning in guix?

2022-01-09 Thread Philip McGrath
Hi, On 1/9/22 06:54, Maxime Devos wrote: Hi, Philip McGrath schreef op za 08-01-2022 om 11:37 [-0500]: This sounds like HTTP Public Key Pinning (HPKP).[1] AIUI, HTTP Public Key Pinning was deprecated, and support has been removed from major browser engines by January 2020.[2][3][4] While it

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Andrew Tropin schreef op zo 09-01-2022 om 12:12 [+0300]: > [...] There is another less generalized example, which demonstrates > how > serialization of sway configuration works right now. > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > `((include ,(local-file

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Andrew Tropin schreef op zo 09-01-2022 om 12:12 [+0300]: > [...] There is another less generalized example, which demonstrates > how > serialization of sway configuration works right now. > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > `((include ,(local-file

Re: Public key pinning in guix?

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Hi, Philip McGrath schreef op za 08-01-2022 om 11:37 [-0500]: > This sounds like HTTP Public Key Pinning (HPKP).[1] AIUI, HTTP Public > Key Pinning was deprecated, and support has been removed from major > browser engines by January 2020.[2][3][4] While it seemed like a good > idea for reasons

Re: Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi Andrew, Am Sonntag, dem 09.01.2022 um 12:12 +0300 schrieb Andrew Tropin: > Before fee0bc serialization for text-config worked this way: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > `("string here" >   ,#~"string valued gexp" >   "source \" >   ,(local-file

Assisting reviewing & committing with tags?

2022-01-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Hi guix reviewers and committers, WDYT of tagging reviewed patches that look good with a usertag, e.g. 'reviewed-looks-good': https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?tag=reviewed-looks-good=guix then if a committer doesn't have much time to review and hence doesn't subscribe to guix-patches@,

Return back original implementation for text-config serialization

2022-01-09 Thread Andrew Tropin
During the upstreaming process of Guix Home commit fee0bced7fec2f9950957976a28f033edd4f877c slipped into master. It introduces a different serialization approach for text-config from what was orginally used: