I agree with the gist of what you're saying, but I first need to establish that
Guix is actually not doing anything wrong before we can talk about how to make
things better.
> On Saturday, April 23rd, 2022 at 9:51 AM, jgart wrote:
>
> The Guix docs do not explicitly state that a uri like
> http
raingloom writes:
> People shouldn't have to take extra steps and burn extra CPU cycles
> for security.
To be clear, I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I wanted to give an
alternative viewpoint: people shouldn't have to take extra steps and burn extra
CPU cycles for performance.
Every
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 11:08, Arun Isaac wrote:
> I would like to update the mumi running on berlin to the latest
> version.
The update of Mumi adds a GraphQL thing to issues.guix.gnu.org, IIUC.
Quoting Ricardo from #guix-hpc [1].
--8<---cut here---start
