Hi!
The ‘staging’ branch is open! Which means that changes with “between
300 and 1,800 rebuilds” (info "(guix) Submitting Patches") can go there;
now’s the time to (re)send package updates in that ballpark.
Incidentally, I was considering ungrafting things on that branch, even
those that go beyo
Hi,
On 4/18/22 16:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Tanguy LE CARROUR skribis:
gpgv: Signature made Wed 16 Sep 2020 22:30:16 CEST
gpgv:using RSA key 6115012DEA3026F62A98A556D6B570842F7E7F8D
gpgv: Can't check signature: No public key
Would you like to add this key to keyring
'/h
Am Freitag, dem 29.04.2022 um 11:27 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos:
> [...]
>
> I thought that
>
> (if already-wrapped?
> ;; PROG is already a wrapper: add the new "export VAR=VALUE"
> ;; lines just before the last line.
> [...])
>
> in 'wrap-program' would avoid creating ..foo-r
Apr 29, 2022, 10:31 by zimon.touto...@gmail.com:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 12:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Stack smashing protection (SSP) may incur measurable run-time overhead
>> though so enabling that one by default may be less consensual.
>>
>
> That’s true and it could be an issue
Hi Maxime,
On Sat, 05 Mar 2022 at 22:49, Maxime Devos wrote:
> (as implied per zimoun's previous mail (‘FWIW, it would be unfair for
> the patch to have the discussion here’), moved to guix-devel)
Thanks. :-)
> Leo Famulari schreef op za 05-03-2022 om 16:13 [-0500]:
>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 0
Hi Guix!
When trying to get a clean $HOME, I see that the ~/.guix-home path is fixed in
the code under gnu/home/*,
usually via (string-append (GETENV "HOME") "/.guix-home").
I want to propose a configurable path to ~/.guix-home, and allow this to be
chosen in the (home-environment ...) declaratio
Hi,
I would like to look at the final config file for xorg that was generated in
the system definition. I looked into
/var/guix/profiles/system/profile/share/X11/ with no success. Where
could I find it ? Could it also be possible to generate it directly in
scheme in the guix repl ?
Best,
Théo
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 10:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I’m not sure what “personal” means in this case.
Quoting [1]:
From: Alex Kost
To: John Soo
Cc: Guix-Devel
Subject: Re: New emacs-guix location
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:20:59 +0300
Jo
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 18:37, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> "raw binaries" (henceforth rawbins) are the unwrapped binaries that
> Guix leaves behind in $PACKAGE/bin with the .$WRAPPER-real name. This
> practise causes several issues. For one, those rawbins are visible in
> the shell by t
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 12:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Stack smashing protection (SSP) may incur measurable run-time overhead
> though so enabling that one by default may be less consensual.
That’s true and it could be an issue for HPC practitioners. However,
quoting Wikipedia [1], for wha
raingloom schreef op vr 29-04-2022 om 00:52 [+0200]:
> It should be pretty easy to detect a wrapped binary without moving it.
> We could just include a magic string in it and scan for that, the exact
> same way we scan for store references. If it contains the "wrapped"
> magic UUID, it's wrapped.
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op vr 29-04-2022 om 06:13 [+0200]:
> The extra wrapping isn't cancelled though? You just append the
> definition of $Y to the the already existing definitions, but you don't
> move the wrapper to $RAWBIN_DIR, because the actual binary already
> exists there.
As I und
Hi Josselin,
Quoting Josselin Poiret (2022-04-28 14:48:55)
> Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
>
> > I recently switched from Xorg to Wayland and I'm quite happy with my new
> > setup! The only last "little" thing that doesn't work for me is
> > screen-sharing using Icecat and/or Chromium!? :-(
>
> I
13 matches
Mail list logo
