Re: FSDG issues of SCUMMVM-based games

Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler 写道： The packages - drascula, […] 1. Their license explicitly prohibits selling of the games themselves and may thus be qualified as non-free. Yep, it's pretty explicit, and I agree that it's an unreasonable restriction that makes the software non-free.

FSDG issues of SCUMMVM-based games

Hi Guix, The packages - drascula, - lure, - queen, and - sky all share issues that make me question whether they should be in Guix. 1. Their license explicitly prohibits selling of the games themselves and may thus be qualified as non-free. 2. The "sources" consist of binaries that are installed

Re: Welcome to our new committer!

Hi Andrew, A big fat welcome from me as well. Savannah UI being what it is, I'm almost completely certain that I managed to make you a member of the ‘GNU Guix’ organisation there. You should be able to push to the Git repository. For my own future reference: did you get any automated mails a

Re: Welcome to our new committer!

Congrats! August 5, 2022 4:27 PM, "Gábor Boskovits" mailto:gboskov...@gmail.com?to=%22G%C3%A1bor%20Boskovits%22%20)> wrote: Welcome! Efraim Flashner mailto:efr...@flashner.co.il)> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. aug. 5., P, 17:59): The Guix Maintainer Collective (tm) would like to welcome Andrew Tr

Re: v2: A proposal of a consistent set of clear rules and guidelines involving snippets, phases and patches.

Hi Maxime, Adding some basic grammatical corrections below: August 5, 2022 1:59 PM, "Maxime Devos" wrote: > Here's a v2. I've changed the structure to something close to what Julien > proposed, it looks a lot > better now to me! > > The (^) should probably be tested before the final version.

Re: Welcome to our new committer!

On 2022-08-05 18:59, Efraim Flashner wrote: > The Guix Maintainer Collective (tm) would like to welcome Andrew Tropin, > aka abcdw, as our newest committer! I'm sure many of you recognize them > from their work on Guix Home and their regular videos hacking on Guix, > among other things. > > So joi

Re: A Few Packaging Questions

Hi! Christopher Rodriguez writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hello All, > > 1. Is there a way to call non-exported procedures from a module in > Guile? There is one but you should not use it. Instead you should send a patch that adds an export to the previously private declaration. And

Re: Welcome to our new committer!

Welcome! Efraim Flashner ezt írta (időpont: 2022. aug. 5., P, 17:59): > The Guix Maintainer Collective (tm) would like to welcome Andrew Tropin, > aka abcdw, as our newest committer! I'm sure many of you recognize them > from their work on Guix Home and their regular videos hacking on Guix, > am

Welcome to our new committer!

The Guix Maintainer Collective (tm) would like to welcome Andrew Tropin, aka abcdw, as our newest committer! I'm sure many of you recognize them from their work on Guix Home and their regular videos hacking on Guix, among other things. So join us in welcoming them! -- Efraim Flashner אפרים

v2: A proposal of a consistent set of clear rules and guidelines involving snippets, phases and patches.

Here's a v2. I've changed the structure to something close to what Julien proposed, it looks a lot better now to me! The (^) should probably be tested before the final version. I don't think the list of 'guiding principles' is worded well, probably needs more work. [something I wrote previou

Re: A real-life test of long-term reproducibility

Hi Konrad, Just one quick comment: August 4, 2022 8:43 AM, "Konrad Hinsen" wrote: > Hi everyone, > > One of our claims is that Guix can rebuild code identically as long as > we have a machine with a Linux kernel and a POSIX filesystem. This actually isn't the claim. Reproducibility is only g

A Few Packaging Questions

Hello All, 1. Is there a way to call non-exported procedures from a module in Guile? I am looking to solve the non-determinism in one of the above-submitted packages (dbqn), and per https://github.com/dzaima/BQN/issues/14 it seems the issue is timestamps in jarfiles, which ant-build-system handle

Re: A proposal of a consistent set of clear rules and guidelines involving snippets, phases and patches.

Currently writing a v2 with a structure like Julien proposed. Greetings, Maxime. OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: A proposal of a consistent set of clear rules and guidelines involving snippets, phases and patches.

On 05-08-2022 05:23, Philip McGrath wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022, at 11:17 PM, Maxime Devos wrote: * Patches must not be used to remove non-free files, because a patch by construction contains the non-free file itself so the patch would be non-free, which would not be acceptable to Guix. Lik

Re: A proposal of a consistent set of clear rules and guidelines involving snippets, phases and patches.

On 05-08-2022 05:38, Philip McGrath wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022, at 11:17 PM, Maxime Devos wrote: * In principle, you can apply a patch from a phase. However, this causes the result of "guix build --source" to not correspond to the actual source code anymore (i.e., it doesn't act as corresp