Hi Julien,
there seems to be a licensing issue with packaging the S3 transporter
for Clojure so I think I won't continue working on this.
If I do and need help I ping you.
Thanks for your help!
Roman
Julien Lepiller writes:
> You could try updating maven resolver, but that means you will
Hi Maxime,
thanks for that link. I just read that thread. I should have asked
earlier, or searched the bug tracker :)
I did basically the same as Reily did, so I guess there's no need to
submit my patches.
Regarding the AOT compilation issues, I believe some of them are solved
by the recent
You could try updating maven resolver, but that means you will also have to
rebuild all its dependents and make sure they don't break.
Maven stuff are a bit fragile under Guix because we can't build them as
intended. There's a chicken-and-egg problem with maven, its dependencies and
its
On 03-09-2022 17:38, Roman Scherer wrote:
Hello Guix,
I would like to enable the S3 transporter for the Clojure package. For
this I need version 1.8.2 of the Maven Resolver packages. Right now we
have version 1.6.3 packaged in Guix.
AFAIK, you don't need to. IIUC, the patch series at
Hello Guix,
I would like to enable the S3 transporter for the Clojure package. For
this I need version 1.8.2 of the Maven Resolver packages. Right now we
have version 1.6.3 packaged in Guix.
Should I update the existing packages to 1.8.2 or create new package
variants with a 1.8 prefix for this?
Hi,
I am late to the party. :-)
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 17:12, kiasoc5 wrote:
> We could have packages recommend other packages to make this discovery
> easier for users, like Arch's opt-depends.
>From my point of view, ’recommend’ is like ’tag’. It is not
well-defined and then it opens to
Hi Ricardo,
I am late to the party. :-)
On Wed, 01 Jun 2022 at 09:50, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Here’s the manifest I came up with:
By curiosity, why does package-with-explicit-python from (guix
build-system python) not fit the bill?
Cheers,
simon
