On 2022-11-05, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>> From bfa13fdd3616839883e50efbbc05fb132610ce67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian
>> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 19:56:12 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH 01/12] guix: lint: Exclude some "@" symbols from various
>> checks.
>
Hi Guix,
make-essential-device-nodes does not seem to have any callers. Can we
remove it?
--
Ricardo
Would it be possible to add a verbose flag to print what exact transitive
dependencies or package changed?
For example when I get an output like this:
lingot(dependencies or package changed)
man-db(dependencies or package changed)
newsboat
Hello,
> Alas Cuirass depends on Fibers, which is currently Linux-only¹, so we
> cannot {cross-,}build it for GNU/Hurd. The good news is that
> ‘remote-worker.scm’ itself doesn’t seem to use Fibers. So I wonder if
> we could arrange to build a stripped-down package that contains nothing
> but
On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 21:06:56 +0600 Akib Azmain Turja wrote:
> Nice idea. Any resources except emacs-guix source code?
Yes, this smalltalk GUI is another resource:
https://10years.guix.gnu.org/program/#demo-a-malleable-gui-for-guix
https://github.com/khinsen/guix-gtoolkit
Hi,
Is anyone working on upgrading to GNOME 43?
jgart writes:
> Is anyone interested in having an emacs-agnostic ncurses interface for
> some aspect of the Guix APIs?
>
> One thing I thought of just now is a nice transitive dependency explorer
> ncurses interface.
>
> `guix install dag-tui`
>
> Forgive me Ambrevar,
>
> jgart
>
Nice idea. Any
Hey,
>Probably we’ll postpone that post-release and drop i586-gnu from
>‘etc/release-manifest.scm’ in the meantime. Objections?
No.
> - armhf-linux: No progress; can we arrange so that ci.guix at least
>builds these core subset of packages?
We already have the 'c
