On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 01:09:43 -0600 jgart wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 07:12:55 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote:
> %% python-build-system phases
> flowchart TB
> unpack -->
> ensure-no-mtimes-pre-1980 -->
> enable-bytecode-determinism -->
> ensure-no-cythonized-files -->
> buil
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 01:09:43 -0600 jgart wrote:
oops ignore the typos here:
> :build -->;
> :install -->;
> :add-install-to-pythonpath;
> :add-install-to-path;
> :wrap -->;
> :check -->;
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 07:12:55 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I don't get why you want a picture. Could you share an example of what it
> would look like?
I was just thinking of something like a flowchart for the build phases.
For example, python-build-system's phases as a flowchart in mermaidjs:
I don't get why you want a picture. Could you share an example of what it would
look like?
Le 22 novembre 2022 23:43:19 GMT+01:00, jgart a écrit :
>On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:12:16 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> The graph will always be flat, since it's a list, so graphviz would be a bit
>> overk
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hello Pjotr
>
> Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > As a new initiative we are discussing/designing a gemini + git issue
> > tracker.
>
> please are there updates about this initiative?
Yeah, issue tracker lives here:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:12:16 +0100 Julien Lepiller wrote:
> The graph will always be flat, since it's a list, so graphviz would be a bit
> overkill :). Being able to list phases could still be cool :)
How about with the plantuml that have packaged?
The graph will always be flat, since it's a list, so graphviz would be a bit
overkill :). Being able to list phases could still be cool :)
Le 22 novembre 2022 22:32:54 GMT+01:00, jgart a écrit :
>hi,
>
>`guix graph --phases` shows the order of phases for a particular package
>and any custom phas
On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:32:54 -0600 jgart wrote:
> wdyt
or maybe it should be:
guix build gnome-recipes --graph-phases
hi,
`guix graph --phases` shows the order of phases for a particular package
and any custom phases that were introduced, deleted, replaced, etc. with
graphviz
wdyt
Hi,
Wojtek Kosior via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just want to add my 2 cents :)
Just to add mine too - libgit2 behaves differently to command-line git
in ways which can make guix do unexpected things when caching clones in
certain cases. This h
Hello,that solves it for my project, thank you.On Nov 19, 2022, at 11:36, Luis Felipe wrote:Hi Sunshine,
On Thursday, November 3rd, 2022 at 15:50, Sunshine via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote:
Hello,I'd like to link guix.gnu.org/pack
Hello Pjotr
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
[...]
> As a new initiative we are discussing/designing a gemini + git issue
> tracker.
please are there updates about this initiative?
Thanks! Gio'
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I just want to add my 2 cents :)
Another issue with libgit2 is that is gives a very misleading error
report when trying to http-clone a repo that only support the old
"dumb" git protocol (as opposed to the newer "smart" one). More details
here[1].
Missing support for that dumb protocol is pr
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022, at 10:39 AM, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 21:21, Maxim Cournoyer
> wrote:
>
>> Given that:
>>
>> * the git CLI doesn't suffer from such poor performance;
>> * This kind of performance problem has been known for years in libgit2
>> [0] with no fix in
Hi Maxim,
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 16:00, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> That sounds very appropriate indeed. I guess we could send
> announcements on API breaking changes to both places. I suppose not
> many people are registered to 'info-guix' (I wasn't myself until
> recently ^^').
Well, more is b
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 21:21, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Given that:
>
> * the git CLI doesn't suffer from such poor performance;
> * This kind of performance problem has been known for years in libgit2
> [0] with no fix in sight;
> * other projects such as Cargo support using the git CLI an
Hi Guix,
on a modern Guix System with Gnome we’re pulling in Python 2. That’s
because gtk uses lash, and lash (last commit was 14 years ago) comes
with Python bindings — for Python 2.
I’d like to propose one of the following steps:
- remove lash completely
- build lash without Python bindings,
zimoun writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 08:57, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> zimoun writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 at 10:51, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>>
It's really nice to have multiple things now (packages.guix.gnu.org,
qa.guix.gnu.org, bordeaux.guix.gnu.org, ..
18 matches
Mail list logo
