Csepp writes:
> But there are packages that were added by others that already specify
> which subpackage they build, and yet seem to be accepted as subpackages.
Do you have an example?
And maybe send in your patches, that may provide more context around
this discussion.
Andy Tai writes:
> It should be; openmotif was just some kind of marketing term
>
> Although guix has some existing packages using lesstif, the now dead
> early motif clone (as free software) and I don't know if emacs may be
> using that...
>
Thanks for the clarification. My interest in this pac
Hi all,
I came across a paper that might be of interest to the Guix community.
The paper is titled "Reproducible Containers”:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3373376.3378519, featured by Meta in their
post:
https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/2022/11/22/hermit-deterministic-linux-test
Csepp writes:
> Thanks! Yeah, the alias solution was not pretty. Guess I'll use
> inherits and set the package argument.
>
> Julien Lepiller writes:
>
>> The importer will not support such a package. As you say, it wants to
>> build them separately because they are separate opam packages. So
It should be; openmotif was just some kind of marketing term
Although guix has some existing packages using lesstif, the now dead
early motif clone (as free software) and I don't know if emacs may be
using that...
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 4:15 PM Eric Brown wrote:
>
> Andy Tai writes:
>
> > Hi, m
Andy Tai writes:
> Hi, motif was a major component of Unix for many years and it would be
> good to add the (now free software) motif to GNU Guix. Can package
> reviewers take a look of the patch in this issue
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59092
>
> Thanks
Hello Andy:
By chance is this the s
Hi, motif was a major component of Unix for many years and it would be
good to add the (now free software) motif to GNU Guix. Can package
reviewers take a look of the patch in this issue
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59092
Thanks
Hi Leo! and hi Guixers,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 02:22 PM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Now that our build farm is running smoothly, I propose we revive the
> practice of feature branches, when appropriate.
>
Heartily agree here. This has come up a few times on #guix and generally with
suppo
Hi,
Even after logging out and in I still can't see `monero-wallet-gui` executable
show up when I press the "windows" key in the GNOME desktop.
See this screenshot:
https://up.nixnet.services/vyv1z6ia.png
I installed monero-gui like this:
https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/confetti/tree/gnome
Thanks! Yeah, the alias solution was not pretty. Guess I'll use
inherits and set the package argument.
Julien Lepiller writes:
> The importer will not support such a package. As you say, it wants to
> build them separately because they are separate opam packages. So,
> either we build them sep
Hello!
Now that our build farm is running smoothly, I propose we revive the
practice of feature branches, when appropriate.
The first one that I propose is a go-updates branch, where we update the
Go compilers. This will affect ~500 packages.
If I understand correctly, Go is a relatively self-co
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 03:36:38PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> If the origin does not exist upstream, then Guix try other servers as
> fallback. For instance,
[...]
> downloading from
> https://tarballs.nixos.org/sha256/1j8bsqzh49vjdxy6l1k4iwax5vpjzniynyd041xjavdzvfii1dlh
> ...
> One potential issue
Am Samstag, dem 07.01.2023 um 10:24 -0600 schrieb jgart:
> * guix/channels.scm (): Add channel description field and
> comment disambiguating the type expected in an introduction field.
> * doc/guix.scm (Invoking guix describe): Add channel description
> field to channels record instance example.
>
The importer will not support such a package. As you say, it wants to build
them separately because they are separate opam packages. So, either we build
them separately too, or we build all at once.
If we build all at once, that's fine. You could name the package ocaml-mirage
and not use any #:
I'm going through my MirageOS commits for what is hopefully the last
time before I send the patches and I realized that a problem that I
thought was isolated is a lot more widespread than I thought.
As an example look at https://github.com/mirage/mirage/
It defines functoria, functoria-runtime, m
Hi!
(please tell me if I should use another channel for such questions)
I recently have been working on enabling tests for skia and including
skia in libreoffice (see bug 60571 for the first part).
Now that I delve into libreoffice's build of skia, I see that there's a
series of patches that li
16 matches
Mail list logo