Re: guix git build error

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:47 PM Julien Lepiller wrote: > I'm afraid I'm unable to reproduce your error. You could try cleaning > the translated texi files to make sure you get the most up-to-date ones: > > rm doc/*.texi > git checkout doc > Does that help? This fixed it. Thanks!

Re: guix git build error

Hi Andy, I'm afraid I'm unable to reproduce your error. You could try cleaning the translated texi files to make sure you get the most up-to-date ones: rm doc/*.texi git checkout doc Does that help? Otherwise, I'll need you to send me say guix-cookbook.fr.texi. There shouldn't be a refernece to

guix git build error

Just check out origin/master of guix git HEAD, make error: Compiling Scheme modules... GEN etc/openrc/guix-daemon [ 0%] LOAD guix.scm GEN etc/gnu-store.mount GEN etc/guix-daemon.service GEN etc/guix-publish.service GEN etc/guix-gc.service GEN etc/ini

Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches

I don't have a strong opinion one way or the other about whether we should formalize the review process. The status quo isn't working well, so I'm in favor of trying something. On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I think the main problem we have is social, not organi

Re: The package/inherit trap

Hi, On 7 March 2023 17:46:50 UTC, Simon Tournier wrote: >Well, from my point of view, we have a trap because the documentation is >not clear. :-) Both. However, merely documenting something is not enough when we have the chance to fix misleading naming, as we do here. It would be nice to have

Unique user and group names validation (was: Re: Backward incompatible changes in mpd-service-type)

+CC guix-devel, Jonathan Hi Liliana, Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Montag, dem 06.03.2023 um 20:13 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> > Am Freitag, dem 17.02.2023 um 07:53 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: >> > > Else an error rather than a warning when multiple same-name users >> > > are defi

Re: guix install nyxt failure

Hi, On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 at 13:33, zimoun wrote: > However, you report an issue with inkscape when there is no path between > nyxt and inkscape; at least, it is what “guix graph --path nyxt > inkscape” says. My bad, that’s incorrect: --8<---cut here---start->

Re: The package/inherit trap

Hi Maxim, On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 11:43, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> @lisp >> (use-modules (gnu packages gdb)) ;for 'gdb' >> >> (define gdb-sans-guile >> (package >> (inherit gdb) >> (inputs (modify-inputs (package-inputs gdb) >> (delete "guile") >> @end lisp > > Do yo

Re: Feedback on indentation rules

Hi Maxim, On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 11:54, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> For what it is worth, I do not see an high difference between the both >> indentations. So, my opinion would to keep the current practise. > > Please take a look at my original message in this thread, > https://lists.gnu.org/arch

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:54:03PM +0200 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > > By the way, when building pandoc for my core-updates profile, I noticed > > that ghc bootstrapping takes a terribly long time. Might there be a fleeting > > chance to jump over some older releases? > I believe in core-updates I'v

Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 11:36, Andreas Enge wrote: > >> 1) Every current and potential new package is covered by a team. >> 2) Every team has at least 3 members, better yet 4 or 5. >>3 members would make it possible that even if one of them is on va

[Internship] Fwd: [gnu-soc] [IMPORTANT] Mentors please ask for an invitation into the org

Hello guix, The following information was sent to the summer of code list, and hereby I forward it to the list, as it contains information for prospective mentors: -- Forwarded message - Feladó: Jose E. Marchesi Date: 2023. márc. 4., Szo, 17:32 Subject: [gnu-soc] [IMPORTANT] Ment

Re: Ungoogled-chromium in core-updates

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 06:14:46PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > Ah, this is a crazy program - C++! > It just failed after 17h of compilation in the very last step: > [52515/52515] LINK ./chrome > FAILED: chrome > since I had only 51 GB of free space on my disk... > > Otherwise said, I expect it to

Re: Ungoogled-chromium in core-updates

Am Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 03:41:58PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Ungoogled-chromium compiles on core-updates! I now even tried it out > and it shows a website :) Ah, this is a crazy program - C++! It just failed after 17h of compilation in the very last step: [52515/52515] LINK ./chrome FAILED: ch

Re: Feedback on indentation rules

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Maxim Cournoyer skribis: >> >>> Thanks for the feedback. I wonder if some are of the opinion that since >>> gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a >>> special form fo

Re: The package/inherit trap

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Fri, 03 Mar 2023 at 20:21, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > >> Could we rename it to something like >> ‘package+replacements/inherit’? To me, that captures the spirit, >> without being overly longer. > > Well, I gave a look at the code and have see

Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches

Hi, On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 2:37 AM Andreas Enge wrote: > > And the feature branches with > QA on cuirass or the Guix Build Coordinator that we talked about at the > Guix Days. For what it's worth, someone turned one of my patch sets into a proof-of-concept for feature branches. You can follow th

Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches

Hi, On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 11:36, Andreas Enge wrote: > 1) Every current and potential new package is covered by a team. > 2) Every team has at least 3 members, better yet 4 or 5. >3 members would make it possible that even if one of them is on vacation >or otherwise busy a patch could b

Re: Feedback on indentation rules

Hi, On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> Thanks for the feedback. I wonder if some are of the opinion that since >> gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a >> special form for its 2nd argument, we should leave the defaul

Re: Follow-up on julia import script

Hi Nicolas, On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 12:23, Nicolas Graves wrote: > I have a WIP version which should solve the issues of hash and > native-inputs. Awesome! > I still have the two following issues, if someone has a hint: > >> - there's a difficulty for defining guix-name->julia-name with the >>

Re: intrinsic vs extrinsic identifier: toward more robustness?

Hi, On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 13:22, Maxime Devos wrote: >>> For git-fetch, the value of the 'commit' field is intrinsic (except when >>> it's a tag instead). >> >> No, it is imprecise. The exception is *not* label tag as value for the >> ’commit’ field but the exception is Git commit hash as val

Re: The package/inherit trap (was: gnu: stellarium: Enable ShowMySky.)

Hi, On Fri, 03 Mar 2023 at 20:21, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Could we rename it to something like > ‘package+replacements/inherit’? To me, that captures the spirit, > without being overly longer. Well, I gave a look at the code and have seen the replacement. But I had not thought about

Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches

Hello, Am Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:53:29AM +0800 schrieb 宋文武: > I usually push patches for others who don't have commit access, while > most packages don't have a team at all, and some with me as the only > team member. > Should I wait for another commiter's approvol under this new policy or > can

Re: Guix v1.1.0 (~2020) and Software Heritage & friends

Hi Ludo, Thanks for giving a look and for your insights. On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 21:40, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Maybe we should write down a road map and “recruit” on these items? Yeah, I totally agree. :-) For what it is worth, in that mood, for instance, + GSoC