"jgart" writes:
> It would create a basic manifest.scm or guix.scm file for the user.
what would the "basic" manifest.scm or guix.scm do? could you share a
sample of what it would look like?
--
Suhail
This email is not an offer capable of acceptance, does not evidence an intention
to enter
"jgart" writes:
> It would generate this boilerplate somehow:
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/tags/cookbook/sk/html_node/Getting-Started.html
i see. i'm relatively new to guix, but i think it would be useful to
have a utility that
- allows us to define some language-specific, and more
Hello everyone,
It seems that linux-libre 6.6 will be released soon.
Would anyone like to try their hand at packaging it for Guix? Wilko, do
you feel up to it?
As I mentioned previously, this requires a bit more work than minor
kernel upgrades because the kernel configs need to be updated.
I'm
--- Original Message ---
On Saturday, October 28th, 2023 at 8:05 AM, Clément Lassieur
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 28 2023, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> > This passff-host package looks a bit odd to me, one thing to mention is
> > that guix show says it has no dependencies, but I
On Sat, Oct 28 2023, Christopher Baines wrote:
> This passff-host package looks a bit odd to me, one thing to mention is
> that guix show says it has no dependencies, but I don't think that's
> correct:
>
> ./pre-inst-env guix show passff-host
> name: passff-host
> version: 1.2.3
>
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>
> snape pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository guix.
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
> new 6c894b7a1a gnu: Add passff.
> 6c894b7a1a is
> I dont think there's any problem wrt categorization. For your Kerberos
> example, either would be fine as they're not mutually exclusive.
> (though I'd lean towards 'authentication' here)
sure, but the crux of the issue here is how to improve code readability; i.e.
would it make the humans
