Re: A basic Shepherd bug?

2023-12-31 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Attila, On Sun, Dec 24 2023, Attila Lendvai wrote: > yes, you should follow the instructions Thank you! The fcgiwrap service started without trouble. For anyone following, an experimental deployment of GNU's Debbugs using Guix System is now available on debbugs.juix.org. The search is proba

Re: emacs packages and elpa

2023-12-31 Thread Cayetano Santos
>dim. 31 déc. 2023 at 13:07, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Cayetano Santos writes: > >> We distribute emacs packages from gnu/elpa by downloading .tar files >> from there: I’m thinking about emacs-ggtags. >> >> My first concern is, what emacs-ggtags 0.9.0 corresponds to exactly ?

Re: Suggestion for a guix shell feature.

2023-12-31 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Apoorv writes: > Sorry, this is my first time using some mailing list. > > I tried using `--container` and `--emulate-fhs` first it doesn't seem > to use `guix.scm` automatically I have to specify it using > `--file=guix.scm`. Second, the container is missing so much more stuff > like cargo

Re: emacs packages and elpa

2023-12-31 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hello, Cayetano Santos writes: > We distribute emacs packages from gnu/elpa by downloading .tar files > from there: I’m thinking about emacs-ggtags. > > My first concern is, what emacs-ggtags 0.9.0 corresponds to exactly ? > There is no 0.9.0 tag in upstream github reposotory, and, if I

emacs packages and elpa

2023-12-31 Thread Cayetano Santos
Hello Guix, We distribute emacs packages from gnu/elpa by downloading .tar files from there: I’m thinking about emacs-ggtags. My first concern is, what emacs-ggtags 0.9.0 corresponds to exactly ? There is no 0.9.0 tag in upstream github reposotory, and, if I understand it correctly, e