Hello,
Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 05:35:44PM +0100 schrieb Edouard Klein:
> Am Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:56:48PM + schrieb Skyler Ferris:
> > I'd like to do my part to keep the project in a good state. However, I
> > am new to interacting with large FLOSS projects so I'm nervous about
> > causing m
Skyler Ferris writes:
> On 2/6/24 05:39, Steve George wrote:
>> I agreed to organise some 'patch review' online sessions in the next couple
>> of
>> weeks.
>>
>> Organising a basic process is a good topic for that online session. For
>> example, elsewhere in the thread someone mentions some ta
Andreas Enge writes:
> I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here:
>https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778
> While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures,
> at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do?
Long term it would
Quoting Andreas Enge (2024-02-09 15:30:44)
> Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:53:59PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR:
> > Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25)
> > > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> > > > Can I safely close it?!
> > >
> > > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there w
Hello,
I see a few "Failed to process revision", for instance here:
https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/68778
While I am not sure why, these look like transient (?) build failures,
at least failures not related to the patch in question. What is there to do?
Andreas
Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 02:53:59PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR:
> Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25)
> > Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> > > Can I safely close it?!
> >
> > Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there was a duplication
> > of effort and the original patch g
Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 14:44:25)
> Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> > Can I safely close it?!
>
> Yep, this unfortunately looks like a case where there was a duplication
> of effort and the original patch got ignored.
>
> It looks like the issue has been closed now.
Not me! đ
Regard
Tanguy LE CARROUR writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> First of, thanks (again) for everything that youâve done with QA!
> It looks great!
>
>
> Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 11:44:11)
>> Let me know if you have any comments or questions!
>
> Unfortunately, I have some (stupid) questions!
>
> I deci
Hi Chris,
First of, thanks (again) for everything that youâve done with QA!
It looks great!
Quoting Christopher Baines (2024-02-09 11:44:11)
> Let me know if you have any comments or questions!
Unfortunately, I have some (stupid) questions!
I decided to give it a try and I picked at random a p
On Fri, Feb 09 2024, Christopher Baines wrote:
> After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently, the
> bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back submitting
> builds for packages changed by patches.
>
> QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches (issues
Hi Guix,
Here is the report of my first attempt at reinstalling Guix System
in a rally long time!
Quoting Tanguy LE CARROUR (2024-02-06 13:52:31)
> Quoting Tanguy LE CARROUR (2024-02-06 08:31:39)
> > In order to test the latest installer, I went to the "latest download"
> > page [1] and clic
Hey!
After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently, the
bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back submitting
builds for packages changed by patches.
QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging patches (issues) as having
been reviewed and ready to merge (revie
12 matches
Mail list logo
