Re: Third-parties are back to upstream

Hi Tai! It should be in the next release, but it's already in the vanilla code. In case anyone try to test the develop branch with Guix. Best regards. Andy Tai writes: > Hi, do you mean the changes will take place in next release (not the > current release 0.6)? This is not apparent from the

Re: Core updates status

Hi Josselin, Josselin Poiret writes: [...] > However, as you can see, these are non-local failures: build failures > have to be fixed in a dependency, which incurs a lot of rebuilding. > I've fixed a couple of them locally, but here's a nasty one I just got > stuck on: curl has a .la file with

Re: Third-parties are back to upstream

Hi, do you mean the changes will take place in next release (not the current release 0.6)? This is not apparent from the context. Thanks for clarification On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 9:01 AM wrote: > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 04 May 2024 13:00:22 +0900 > From: Nala Ginrut > To: "arta...@gnu.org" >

Re: Core updates status

Hi everyone, I've just cleaned up the c-u branch locally (removing all the duplicated commits) and rebased it on master since we're going to have to rewrite history anyways. I'm trying to build a bit with it to double check that nothing got messed up in the process, so I haven't pushed that anywh

Re: `make check` fails when trying to build from Git

On 4 May, Ashvith Shetty wrote: > I've been looking forward to contributing some packages to Guix, but so > far, I've not been able to figure out from the manual, so I'm going through > the entire Contributing > section. > > So