Hi Juliana,
Thanks for your help on the matter!
After reading your explanation about tail recursion I understand the
concept much better.
I still need to find a way to implement the problematic code in a
tail-recursive fashion. But, I'm not convinced that it will solve the
problem. Specially sin
Hi,
The latest mumi CLI (version 0.3.0) comes with a new `mumi am'
subcommand. With this, you can automagically apply the latest patchset
in an issue.
First, set the current issue (say 61036).
$ mumi current 61036
Then, apply the latest patchset using
$ mumi am
You may also apply a patchset
Hi,
On Monday, June 10th, 2024 at 2:26 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>
>
> Am Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 09:19:14PM -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari:
>
> > You're right, it was ZFS itself failing to build.
> > *** ZFS Version: zfs-2.2.3-1
> > *** Compatible Kernels: 3.10 - 6.7
> > Should we change something ab
> We are happy to announce the release of GNU Mes 0.26.1.
Great work everyone ^_^
-Jeremiah
Andy Tai writes:
> Hi, I have a patch submission that builds fine (in the GNU Guix sense,
> that is, unit tests run and pass) locally but fails on Guix QA due to
> unit tests failing.
>
> I suspect that the failures are due to the build machine (or machines)
> as plain x86-64 PC (fine as build se
Am Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 09:19:14PM -0400 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> You're right, it was ZFS itself failing to build.
> *** ZFS Version: zfs-2.2.3-1
> *** Compatible Kernels: 3.10 - 6.7
> Should we change something about zfs-auto-snapshot? Or is the status quo
> okay?
Somebody has suggest
