Re: Improving build-time checks for kernel module configuration + two other discussion points

2024-06-12 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Vagrant, On Wed, Jun 12 2024, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > maybe this is just a difference in choice of words? Because your video [1] brought me to Guix long after you discovered your own "crush" on it, I feel silly writing here, but like Attila said: Guix services are features. Kind regar

Re: Improving build-time checks for kernel module configuration + two other discussion points

2024-06-12 Thread Attila Lendvai
> > My idea for how to mitigate this is adding some sort of extensible > > service where services can register necessary kernel configuration > > settings. When the config option is unset, a build-time error is raised. > > > That sounds good to me, although I am not sure why it should be a > runt

Re: GNU Mes 0.26.1 released

2024-06-12 Thread Tobias Alexandra Platen
Good news, I'd be interested in doing a port of Mes to the PowerPC architecture. Unfortunately in the last few month I did not have many time to work with Mes and Guix. I am also thinking of doing a FOSDEM talk next year, as I did this year for the first time. Tobias Alexandra On Sat, 2024-06-08

Re: New mumi am subcommand

2024-06-12 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Arun, Arun Isaac writes: > Hi, > > The latest mumi CLI (version 0.3.0) comes with a new `mumi am' > subcommand. With this, you can automagically apply the latest patchset > in an issue. > > First, set the current issue (say 61036). > > $ mumi current 61036 > > Then, apply the latest patchset

Re: CI is not processing jobs

2024-06-12 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Andreas, Andreas Enge writes: > Am Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 07:48:27PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: >> Could the graph on >>https://ci.guix.gnu.org/metrics >> be augmented by the number of packages to be built for the different >> architectures? > > In that direction, the metrics now show that

Re: CI is not processing jobs

2024-06-12 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 07:48:27PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Could the graph on >https://ci.guix.gnu.org/metrics > be augmented by the number of packages to be built for the different > architectures? In that direction, the metrics now show that very few packages were built in the last 24

Re: Google Summer of Code Inquiry

2024-06-12 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Thanks, I'm looking forward to testing it :) TBF I've never received a patch so no pressure. Have a good day, Noé Lopez Sebastian Dümcke writes: > Morning all, > > thanks for the push ;) Last months life got busy and I could not wrap > this up but it is on my TODO list for this month. > > @No

Re: Google Summer of Code Inquiry

2024-06-12 Thread Sebastian Dümcke
Morning all, thanks for the push ;) Last months life got busy and I could not wrap this up but it is on my TODO list for this month. @Noé: I would love some help in testing. I try to send you a patch soon (i.e. end of next week) (never used git send-mail before). Best Sebastian On 6/12/24

Call for contribution to the Guix infrastructure

2024-06-12 Thread Zach Oglesby
I would be happy to give a hand, but I am not sure that I qualify as a known guix community memeber. I have been around a while and am also active in the system crafters community. I also had access to Fedora Infrastructure for years to work on docs build systems, etc. I have been doing System Adm

Re: Cleaning up branches on savannah

2024-06-12 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello Mark, Am Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:16:59AM -0400 schrieb Mark H Weaver: > For IceCat updates, which almost always include security fixes, it is > important to have very fast turnaround time on the test results. > ci.guix.gnu.org normally starts building the new IceCat within an hour > or so of

Re: Improving build-time checks for kernel module configuration + two other discussion points

2024-06-12 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2024-06-11, Richard Sent wrote: > Guix provides both linux-libre and linux-libre--generic kernels. > The generic kernels seem to match the upstream defconfigs very closely > with a few minor adjustments (namely default-extra-linux-options) while > the linux-libre kernel is entirely customized. >