Hi,
qua 28 ago 2024 às 18:56:45 (1724882205), kaelyn.al...@protonmail.com enviou:
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Do you have any modifications to e.g. the binutils package definition? It
> looks like the error is coming from using "cons" to append a configure flag;
> from the output above:
Not local,
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> @item TeX@tie{}Live 2024.2 (was 20230313);
> @end itemize
You may want to mention that the versioning scheme for TeX Live has
changed and, unless I'm mistaken, users will need to force upgrade for
these packages. Indeed, I doubt "guix pull && guix upgrade" will
On Thursday, August 29th, 2024 at 12:53 PM, Ludovic Courtès
wrote:
>
>
> Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org skribis:
>
> > If there are no objections, I’d like us to go ahead and rebase/merge
> > ‘core-updates’ tomorrow, Friday 30th, after adding an entry in
> > ‘etc/news.scm’ (I can do that
Hi Ian, browser-team, guix,
qui 29 ago 2024 às 07:30:39 (1724927439), m...@tobias.gr enviou:
> Hullo Ian,
>
> On 28 August 2024 23:15:23 UTC, Ian Eure wrote:
> >Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >> I would suggest not creating a separate mailing list per team. […]
> >How does one request the creation
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> If there are no objections, I’d like us to go ahead and rebase/merge
> ‘core-updates’ tomorrow, Friday 30th, after adding an entry in
> ‘etc/news.scm’ (I can do that but I won’t mind if somebody else does; we
> can coordinate on IRC and/or here.)
Here’s a proposed news
"Brennan Vincent" skribis:
> I should have mentioned that I'm on a foreign distro (Fedora). Which if
> I correctly understand how things work means I'm not using the Shepherd
> at all. Is the patch you linked relevant anyway?
[...]
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/30948
Yes: the bug in questio
I should have mentioned that I'm on a foreign distro (Fedora). Which if
I correctly understand how things work means I'm not using the Shepherd
at all. Is the patch you linked relevant anyway?
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> "Brennan Vincent" skribis:
>
>> See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/ht
hi guixers,
i'll present today on upstream patch review at the guix london meetup
info is below
https://octodon.social/@fabionatali/113024020737282584
slides
https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/mumiii
time (thanks ashvith)
https://dateful.com/eventlink/1365543472
best,
jgart
https://wherei
Hello Guix!
I rebased ‘core-updates’ on ‘master’ hours ago; so far, so good, though
there are a few new build failures:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/1586727?status=newly-failed
Nothing too bad, except for icedove:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/5510567/details
and perf:
https://ci.guix.g
Hi,
"Brennan Vincent" skribis:
> See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-04/msg00608.html
> for historical context.
>
> I have to bump this value locally in order to build openjdk@16:jdk
> because the build requires more than 1 PIDs.
>
> Perusing the output of ps suggests that
Hullo Ian,
On 28 August 2024 23:15:23 UTC, Ian Eure wrote:
>Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> I would suggest not creating a separate mailing list per team. […]
>How does one request the creation of a browser-team mailing list?
We'd ask the GNU sysadmins, but I agree with Ludo' here.
Kind regards,
11 matches
Mail list logo
