Re: bug#72686: Impossible to remove all offload machines

Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes: [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] Hello, Ian Eure writes: Disregard this, I continued thinking after sending the email (as one does) and realized that any managed file will be a link into the store -- so if the system is reconfigured with no build-machines

Re: Updating rclone and non-free dependencies

Hi Attila, I've pushed patches adjusting import from proposed by Christina O'Donnell . As you may check the thread - all recent work on improving import are mentioned and #69827 looks more tempting to be applied as it implements logic to work with monorepo, sta

Re: Rebuilding a package after removing a build step

Hi, On Tue, Sep 17 2024, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > 'That is not possible.' I believe I experienced it when removing or adding propagated or native inputs (not sure) to my very own guile-pam [1] while using 'guix shell'. Unfortunately, I have not had time to investigate. Kind regards Felix

Re: Rebuilding a package after removing a build step

Suhail Singh writes: > On a related note, when multiple channels are enabled, is there a way to > specify a specific package from a particular channel? Yes, using the -e option followed by the Guile module name. See https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-package.html Yo

Re: Rebuilding a package after removing a build step

Konrad Hinsen writes: > Unfortunately, when there are several packages with identical name and > version number in two channels, Guix silently chooses one of them. Ah, I had wondered what it did. Thank you for reporting. > It would probably be more useful to emit a warning. Agreed. On a rela

error: %ensure-setuid-program-list: unbound variable

Hello Guix, I have a guix.scm file in which I depend on the guix package. When building this package with autotools I see the following error when compiling my guile modules: error: %ensure-setuid-program-list: unbound variable I'm not using that symbol anywhere in my own code, but probably som

Re: Updating rclone and non-free dependencies

> The go-team branch contains changes to importer which makes recursive > import much easier. i have some extensive changes to the go importer that is on my TODO to update and re-submit: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55242 i made these commits when i was importing some projects with some 100+ d

Updating rclone and non-free dependencies

Hi, Thanks for taking the upgrade flag. The go-team branch contains changes to importer which makes recursive import much easier. May you elaborate on non-free software please? Guix has aws-sdk-go and aws-sdk-go-v2 for a long (5+y) time the license is asl2.0 (Apache License) as most of the gol

Re: Rebuilding a package after removing a build step

Hi Tobias, Geerinckx-Rice writes: > 'That is not possible.' You must somehow not have measured what you thought > you measured. Thanks for restoring my faith in Guix! You were in fact right, I was not measuring what I thought you measured, but for an unusual reason. > Can you 'reproduce' t