> From: Nicolas Graves
> Cc: monn...@iro.umontreal.ca, l...@gnu.org, emacs-de...@gnu.org,
> and...@trop.in, guix-devel@gnu.org, bjorn.bi...@thaodan.de,
> r...@constantly.at, felix.lech...@lease-up.com
> Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 09:50:06 +0200
>
> On 2024-05-12 09:29
> Cc: Ludovic Courtès , emacs-de...@gnu.org,
> Andrew Tropin , guix-devel@gnu.org, bjorn.bi...@thaodan.de,
> r...@constantly.at, felix.lech...@lease-up.com
> Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 01:07:51 +0200
> From: Nicolas Graves via "Emacs development discussions."
>
>
> A lightly cleaned-up version at
> From: Stefan Kangas
> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 08:57:07 -0800
> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, emacs-de...@gnu.org
>
> The main difference between GNU ELPA and NonGNU ELPA is that the former
> requires all copyright to be assigned to the Free Software Foundation,
> whereas the latter does not.
Not only
> From: Gavin Smith
> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 00:46:09 +0100
> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Texinfo
>
> I'm still trying to implement very basic functionality in the Qt code.
> I will probably push on with it and see how far I get. If GTK is used
> instead, the needed functionality would be present,
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: wi...@pobox.com, guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-u...@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:57:22 +0100
>
> > I'm saying that when cross-compiling, it's easy to produce binaries
> > that are unusable on Windows because Guile is not run natively during
> > the
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: wi...@pobox.com, guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-u...@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 15:04:52 +0100
>
> I think Andy was referring to the possibility of cross-compiling
> packages that use Guile to MinGW. That is already possible thanks to
> the work of
> From: l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:30:57 +0100
> Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, guile-u...@gnu.org
>
> > Open questions would be, what about other targets like macOS or Windows
> > or whatever? There I don't know. I suspect that if Guix becomes
> > popular enough, someon
