Should ‘./configure’ check for makeinfo? ‘make’ will fail when makeinfo
isn’t installed.
pgp6b8ytEaZGE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
BTW, what did you think of the idea of using recutils format as the
output? (Either as the sole output format, or otherwise as a secondary
format.)
I like the idea. It’s always better to use a documented format,
especially when it comes with a mode for Emacs. And don’t forget that
• MIPS64/N64 support: the bootstrap tarballs are now all available
through cross-compilation from x86_64, so it’s “just” a matter of
feeding them in bootstrap.scm and trying out.
I’m also interested in this one.
Oh, I forgot that I’ll need five tarballs, not two [1]. Can I get the
other
Another possible solution is to ship our own bootstrap binary (like we
do with Guile and Bash). But first, I’ll try to patch it. Are you OK
with that?
With shipping a binary of GHC? Well, if that’s the only reasonable way
to do it, then yes.
GNU/MIT Scheme does that for instance, but
I can’t find anything relevant there. I suppose that Nix people don’t
have to touch those binaries since they have ‘/bin/sh’ in a chroot.
What string exactly are you trying to patch? Just /bin/sh? In which
binary?
For now, at least ‘/bin/sh’ in ‘inplace/bin/ghc-cabal’.
I’m not sure
Btw, I can't see the patches as attachements, only inlined. Is
it a problem with my mail client or does everybody witness the same
behaviour ?
I see the same. They also appear inline in the archives [1].
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2013-08/msg4.html
/ghc.scm
new file mode 100644
index 000..1a3d308
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/ghc.scm
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
+;;; Copyright © 2013 Nikita Karetnikov nik...@karetnikov.org
+;;;
+;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
+;;;
+;;; GNU Guix is free
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
