Update default Golang version on go-team branch

Hi Guix! I had a courage to refresh the default Goang version to build packages from 1.17 to 1.21 as all version before it are already EoL. After rebuilt 900+ packages locally I've fixed some failing to build packages. The packages in golang-build were refresh as well which involve to rebuild

Re: python-duckdb stuck in its tests

Hi, I've pushed update togather with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71480. It fixed the build, check and sanity check phases in ce98c3436c57e7b366a3ec06c47a7e8919c990fb. Thanks, Oleg On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 11:02, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > It looks like updating

Re: python-duckdb stuck in its tests

Hi Andreas, It looks like updating to 1.0.0 has not issue wit passing test on my local checkout after applying this patch --8<---cut here---start->8--- @@ -23334,20 +23334,24 @@ (define-public python-chevron (define-public python-duckdb (package (name

Re: 07/13: gnu: go-gopkg-in-cheggaaa-pb-v1: Rename to go-github-com-cheggaaa-pb.

-com-cheggaaa-pb. > > > > * gnu/packages/golang-xyz.scm (go-gopkg-in-cheggaaa-pb-v1): Rename to > > go-github-com-cheggaaa-pb and sort alphabetically. > > (go-gopkg-in-cheggaaa-pb-v3): Inherit from go-github-com-cheggaaa-pb. > > > > C

Re: SageMath packaging work

Hi Ada, It looks like it was missed in patches https://issues.guix.gnu.org/search?query=SageMath+is%3Aopen 56729 patch[RFC PATCH 00/10] Add sagemath. 70924 patch[PATCH 00/10] Add some SageMath standard packages. Maybe it needs some love to bring to the master branch. I'll take a look while

Re-activate Coirass specification

Hi Guix! I might need to call for some advise from the person with Coirass administration experience. In short I'd like to set new specification for go-team - I was provided with TLS cert (thanks to Maxim) - Navigate to - Fill up all fields, pick

Re: Request to add a go-team branch and set it on CI.

admin > > > > On lun., 22 janv. 2024 at 19:58, Sharlatan Hellseher < > sharlata...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> May I ask someone with admin rights to the build farm to set up > >> go-team branch, please? > > > > What is the status of this reques

Initialization of go-team branch.

Hello Guix! After intitiating go-team branch (inspired by the rust-team) I started pushing reviwed patches to it, which may require a full Golang rebuild. My future plan is to update the existing Golang ecosystem to recent versions, as most of the packages are quite dated (2-5 years old). As an

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

Hi Simon! > What is the status of this? Is all fine? There are new modules available which I use for moving packages from golang.scm and other places e.g. syncthing.scm. - golang-build.scm - golang-check.scm - golang-compression.scm - golang-crypto.scm - golang-web.scm - golang-xyz.scm I

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi Guix! I've pushed split IV https://issues.guix.gnu.org/69042 Now there are all base golang-* modules which I'm about to populate on demand during patch review. - golang-build - golang-check - golang-compression - golang-crypto - golang-web - golang-xyz These two may be added as well if I

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi, I stick to this flow - pick a package from golang.scm e.g. go-package-a - identify destination (any of golang-*.scm) - place go-package-a to e.g. golang-web.scm in alphabetic order - remove go-package-a from golang.scm - by using magit find all authors contributing to go-package-a - place

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hello, Thank you for your research on that, I was not expected to go far like you did :-) My short plan was to follow existing naming model which is in use for python-*.scm, lisp-*.scm, perl-*scm, java-*.scm. I see that golang would need some extra modules in the future and comparing with

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi, I've pushed the split III to master. - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68605 - https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68605 And it's picked up by CI. - https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/1082575 > Hmm, there seems to be a limit in the degree of parallelizability in > this process

Request to add a go-team branch and set it on CI.

Hi Guix, May I ask someone with admin rights to the build farm to set up go-team branch, please? It would be nice to test/re-build packages before merging to master branch. It would help to cover cases where rebuild the world is required: - https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68423: guix:

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi Christina, > Would it be more organized if they was just one order: either > in alphabetical order or grouped by function? My suggestion > would be to use the file split to group by function and then sort > each file alphabetically. Do you know how it is arranged for other > languages? I've

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi, Part III of the split is sent for review, https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68605 Thank, Oleg -- VCS: https://github.incerto.xyz/; https://git.sr.ht/~hellseher/ GPG: 9847 81DE 689C 21C2 6418 0867 76D7 27BF F62C D2B5 … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

Hi Maxim, Thank you for detailed replay. > The branch workflow for teams is to use a *-team branch that is short > lived, e.g. for the time needed to do the integration work; with an > associated job spec in Cuirass (ci.guix.gnu.org) to build it. Am I ok to push new go-team branch? And I'll

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

pack and place missing in native inputs/propagated inputs depending on the purpose. I would love to investigate the count of packages in `34 gnu/packages/syncthing.scm:` :-) Thanks, Oleg On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 at 21:31, Troy Figiel wrote: > > Hi Oleg and others, > > On 2024-01-1

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

all tests. Thanks, Oleg On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 20:25, Simon Tournier wrote: > > Hi, > > CC: > $ ./etc/teams.scm list-members go > Katherine Cox-Buday > Sharlatan Hellseher > > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 22:12, Troy Figiel wrote: > > > --8<--

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

hanks, > Oleg > > On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Sharlatan Hellseher > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've accidentally included other patch to this series. I've re-sent it > under the > > new issue number https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66627. > > > > Thanks

Commit Access: Sharlatan Hellseher

for allowing me to become a committer member. I am looking forward to continuing our collaboration. If anyone has a good patch review workflow using Emacs, Gnus, and Magit, I would appreciate it ;-) Regards, Sharlatan Hellseher (Oleg) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Question on python-pydantic update, rust and maturin build tool

erhead and does not break built of dependent packages. https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67915 Thanks, Oleg On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 at 11:56, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 12:27:38AM +0000, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > > Hi Guix! > > > > > > It mig

Question on python-pydantic update, rust and maturin build tool

Hi Guix! It might be addressed to rust/python teams. https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-core During update of some packages from (gnu packages astronomy) I've faced with requirement for the fresh version of pydantic which depends on pydantic-core built with rust and maturin. This thread is

Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi Guix, Do you think it is correctly extracted to golang-web? https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66827 Thank, Oleg

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

low level 0 dependencies packages. I found a lot of golang packages in (gnu packages syncthing) which are not 100% related to syncthing itself, possibly the were left there long ago. Thanks, Oleg On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > > Hi, > > I've accidentally in

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi, I've accidentally included other patch to this series. I've re-sent it under the new issue number https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66627. Thanks, Oleg On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 19:17, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm about to create golang-check and golang-build modules

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi Maxim, I identified about 17 packages related to check/assert/mock/lint process and moved them to (gnu packages golang-check) https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66619 Thanks, Oleg On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 04:52, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > Hi, > > Sharlatan Hellseher writes: &

Re: Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi, I'm about to create golang-check and golang-build modules, which both are core and would be in used by others. As Maxim mentioned, the most time consumption task would be migrating copyrights header properly. On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, 22:25 Wilko Meyer, wrote: > > Hi, > > Sharlat

Golang mudules to follow common grouping

Hi Guix! I've noticed the number of Golang packages start growing. I expect more packages to be reviewed and merged by quick check of Issues. I think it's time to split (gnu packages golang) into some logical groups, see Python, Lisp for example. - golang-web - golang-check - golang-build -

Re: Failed to connect to `/var/guix/daemon-socket/socket': Connection refused

Hi, In my case I had the same error after guix system reconfigure on native Guix system. The suggested brute method gave me no result. I've deleted the socket file and restart daemon which helped to resolve guix pull issue Steps: ~$ sudo su # to

Astronomy 2023/08 updates

Hi Guix! The end of August Astronomy related packages udpates and new packages. Hope QA will green them up soon :) * Updates - date-time :: 20230905T163102+0100 - commit :: 8d19ff23052bffb1c43f0d39f543eb0b1e363074 - issues :: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65814 - quick [16/16][100%] - [X]

Re: Scheduled monthly update for (gnu packages astronomy)

Hi Guix! Thank you for feedback, I've sent V2 for https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201 It was built successfully from the latest master branch check out. Thanks, Oleg On Mon, 24 Jul 2023, 18:36 Sharlatan Hellseher, wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > Thank you for your time. > > This issu

Re: Scheduled monthly update for (gnu packages astronomy)

Hi Andreas, Thank you for your time. This issue may be closed https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64287 as Tobias applied all of it's patches. I'm not sure about the reason of splittingt them into smaller ones, it may be a question to him :-) I'll rebase patches from https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201

Scheduled monthly update for (gnu packages astronomy)

Hi Guix! As you may noticed Guix's collection for astro[physics|nomy] is growing! It is about 70+ packaged projects just in (gnu packages astronomy), and I try to prepare more for review, sourcing, mainly, from Debian astro and tracking the progress in the channel

RE: London Guix meetup

Hi, I'm based in Manchester and would like to join but its mid week time not realistic for me. Next time lets group up in Manchester too! Thanks, Oleg

Re: Python feature branch

Hi, I've fixed the build and updated chain of inputs for python-astropy, posting here for wider awareness. Thanks, Oleg

Question on the process of packge withdrawal

Hi Guix! I've noticed a tendency in core-updates and staging of withdrawing old packages, packages which were created from forks in the past or packages failing to build due to increased complexity of the package. If we check

Re: Guix - installation script

Hi, Thank you for feedback, I'll fix it on free time. br, sh On 1 Aug 2017 11:55, "ng0" <n...@infotropique.org> wrote: > Sharlatan Hellseher transcribed 5.6K bytes: > > Hi, > > > > I've found your project very interesting. I've played with installa

Guix - installation script

Hi, I've found your project very interesting. I've played with installation instruction but it has a lot of different steps, for convenience purpose I've wrote installation script which goes through all points of your guide. As far as I could say, there is no any official installation script for