Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Vagrant, On 2020-07-02 16:34, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: On 2020-07-02, Brice Waegeneire wrote: To support the widest hardware and boot options possible I went with iPXE as a chainloader. Meaning that any machine doing a PXE boot (or with builtin iPXE with restricted feature set) will load

Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-07-02, Brice Waegeneire wrote: > To support the widest hardware and boot options possible I went with > iPXE > as a chainloader. Meaning that any machine doing a PXE boot (or with > builtin iPXE with restricted feature set) will load the iPXE bootloader > first, which will then properly

Re: [GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Brice, On Thu, 02 Jul 2020 10:11:28 + Brice Waegeneire wrote: > My issue building a static 'nfs-utils' is that it can't find > 'getrpcbynumber{,_r}' “configure: error: Neither getrpcbynumber_r nor > getrpcbynumber are available”. This function should be provided by the > libc > or by

[GSOC 2020] network-boot-service

2020-07-02 Thread Brice Waegeneire
Hello Danny, Gábor, Sorry for the very late update on the status of this GSOC about network booting. At the moment I have working network boot service which I'm using to boot various baremetal machines, I'm currently working on adding NFS support to the initrd. To support the widest hardware