Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ben Woodcroft skribis:
>
>> From 0796e8be05977e6d30eab787a1550bd8d1f12b2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ben Woodcroft
>> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 22:10:20 +1000
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add mafft.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (mafft): New variable.
>
> I’l
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> From 0796e8be05977e6d30eab787a1550bd8d1f12b2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ben Woodcroft
> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 22:10:20 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add mafft.
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (mafft): New variable.
I’ll leave it to Ricardo, but two minor c
On 07/09/15 18:55, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:58:42PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
It seems this message was left unanswered. Andreas?
I had a cursory look at the patch, here are some comments:
[..]
+protein sequences. For instance, it offers L-INS-i (accurate; for alig
Andreas Enge writes:
>> +protein sequences. For instance, it offers L-INS-i (accurate; for alignment
>> +of
> Is this an artefact of the mailer?
In the original patch I see this instead:
> + "MAFFT offers a range of multiple alignment methods for nucleotide and
> +protein sequences. For
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:58:42PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> It seems this message was left unanswered. Andreas?
I had a cursory look at the patch, here are some comments:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:43:31PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> + #:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (
Ben Woodcroft skribis:
> On 26/07/15 20:29, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>>> I would use a snippet for something internal to Guix, or specific to the
>>> way we handle things, while a patch is intended to be passed upstream (or
>>> sometimes
On 26/07/15 20:29, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
I would use a snippet for something internal to Guix, or specific to the
way we handle things, while a patch is intended to be passed upstream (or
sometimes taken from upstream already) to corr
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:43:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> I would use a snippet for something internal to Guix, or specific to the
> way we handle things, while a patch is intended to be passed upstream (or
> sometimes taken from upstream already) to correct a bug in the software.
Well, I am
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
>> I'm actually a bit confused as to the difference between a snippet vs. a
>> patch stage as above - when is each appropriate? Snippets are only for
>> removing non-free software?
>
> I would use a snippet for
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:10:14PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> I'm actually a bit confused as to the difference between a snippet vs. a
> patch stage as above - when is each appropriate? Snippets are only for
> removing non-free software?
I would use a snippet for something internal to Guix, or
On 26/07/15 05:26, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi Ben,
+ #:phases
+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (add-after 'unpack 'enter-dir
+(lambda _ (chdir "core") #t))
+ ;; on advice from the MAFFT authors, do not distribute mafft-profile,
+ ;; mafft
Hi Ben,
> + #:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (add-after 'unpack 'enter-dir
> +(lambda _ (chdir "core") #t))
> + ;; on advice from the MAFFT authors, do not distribute
> mafft-profile,
> + ;; mafft-distance mafft-homologs.rb
Note that the "extensions" listed on the website are research/non-profit
only, and so not fit for inclusion.
>From b966b0c8ab9b194bbb7089cc4b4e3a9727862691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Woodcroft
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:42:17 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add mafft.
* gnu/packages/bioinform
13 matches
Mail list logo
